Cargando…

Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels

BACKGROUND: The optimum channel(s) used to recruit smokers living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods for smoking cessation behavioural therapy (SCBT) is unknown. This paper examines the channels through which smokers participating in a free, multi-session SCBT programme heard about and were referred to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benson, Fiona E., Nierkens, Vera, Willemsen, Marc C., Stronks, Karien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0024-3
_version_ 1782383816474624000
author Benson, Fiona E.
Nierkens, Vera
Willemsen, Marc C.
Stronks, Karien
author_facet Benson, Fiona E.
Nierkens, Vera
Willemsen, Marc C.
Stronks, Karien
author_sort Benson, Fiona E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimum channel(s) used to recruit smokers living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods for smoking cessation behavioural therapy (SCBT) is unknown. This paper examines the channels through which smokers participating in a free, multi-session SCBT programme heard about and were referred to this service in a disadvantaged neighbourhood, and compares participants’ characteristics and attendance between channels. METHODS: 109 participants, recruited from free SCBT courses in disadvantaged areas of two cities in the Netherlands, underwent repeated surveys. Participants were asked how they heard about the SCBT and who referred them. Participant characteristics were compared between five channels, including the General Practitioner (GP), a community organisation, word of mouth, another health professional, and media or self-referred. Whether the channels through which people heard about or were referred to the service predicted attendance of ≥4 sessions was investigated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Over a quarter of the participants had no or primary education only, and more than half belonged to ethnic minority populations. Most participants heard through a single channel. More participants heard about (49 %) and were referred to (60 %) the SCBT by the (GP) than by any other channel. Factors influencing quit success, including psychosocial factors and nicotine dependence, did not differ significantly between channel through which participants heard about the SCBT. No channel significantly predicted attendance. CONCLUSION: The GP was the single most important source to both hear about and be referred to smoking cessation behavioural therapy in a disadvantaged neighbourhood. A majority of participants of low socioeconomic or ethnic minority status heard about the programme through this channel. Neither the channel through which participants heard about or were referred to the therapy influenced attendance. As such, concentrating on the channel which makes use of the existing infrastructure and which is highest yielding, the GP, would be an appropriate strategy if recruitment resources were scarce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4521474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45214742015-08-01 Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels Benson, Fiona E. Nierkens, Vera Willemsen, Marc C. Stronks, Karien Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: The optimum channel(s) used to recruit smokers living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods for smoking cessation behavioural therapy (SCBT) is unknown. This paper examines the channels through which smokers participating in a free, multi-session SCBT programme heard about and were referred to this service in a disadvantaged neighbourhood, and compares participants’ characteristics and attendance between channels. METHODS: 109 participants, recruited from free SCBT courses in disadvantaged areas of two cities in the Netherlands, underwent repeated surveys. Participants were asked how they heard about the SCBT and who referred them. Participant characteristics were compared between five channels, including the General Practitioner (GP), a community organisation, word of mouth, another health professional, and media or self-referred. Whether the channels through which people heard about or were referred to the service predicted attendance of ≥4 sessions was investigated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Over a quarter of the participants had no or primary education only, and more than half belonged to ethnic minority populations. Most participants heard through a single channel. More participants heard about (49 %) and were referred to (60 %) the SCBT by the (GP) than by any other channel. Factors influencing quit success, including psychosocial factors and nicotine dependence, did not differ significantly between channel through which participants heard about the SCBT. No channel significantly predicted attendance. CONCLUSION: The GP was the single most important source to both hear about and be referred to smoking cessation behavioural therapy in a disadvantaged neighbourhood. A majority of participants of low socioeconomic or ethnic minority status heard about the programme through this channel. Neither the channel through which participants heard about or were referred to the therapy influenced attendance. As such, concentrating on the channel which makes use of the existing infrastructure and which is highest yielding, the GP, would be an appropriate strategy if recruitment resources were scarce. BioMed Central 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4521474/ /pubmed/26227135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0024-3 Text en © Benson et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Benson, Fiona E.
Nierkens, Vera
Willemsen, Marc C.
Stronks, Karien
Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels
title Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels
title_full Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels
title_fullStr Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels
title_full_unstemmed Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels
title_short Smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels
title_sort smoking cessation behavioural therapy in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: an explorative analysis of recruitment channels
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0024-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bensonfionae smokingcessationbehaviouraltherapyindisadvantagedneighbourhoodsanexplorativeanalysisofrecruitmentchannels
AT nierkensvera smokingcessationbehaviouraltherapyindisadvantagedneighbourhoodsanexplorativeanalysisofrecruitmentchannels
AT willemsenmarcc smokingcessationbehaviouraltherapyindisadvantagedneighbourhoodsanexplorativeanalysisofrecruitmentchannels
AT stronkskarien smokingcessationbehaviouraltherapyindisadvantagedneighbourhoodsanexplorativeanalysisofrecruitmentchannels