Cargando…

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers are a common and severe complication of spinal cord injury, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries where people often need to manage pressure ulcers alone and at home. Telephone-based support may help people in these situations to manage their pressure u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arora, Mohit, Harvey, Lisa Anne, Hayes, Alison Joy, Chhabra, Harvinder Singh, Glinsky, Joanne Valentina, Cameron, Ian Douglas, Lavrencic, Lucija, Arumugam, Narkeesh, Hossain, Sohrab, Bedi, Parneet Kaur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008369
_version_ 1782383827604209664
author Arora, Mohit
Harvey, Lisa Anne
Hayes, Alison Joy
Chhabra, Harvinder Singh
Glinsky, Joanne Valentina
Cameron, Ian Douglas
Lavrencic, Lucija
Arumugam, Narkeesh
Hossain, Sohrab
Bedi, Parneet Kaur
author_facet Arora, Mohit
Harvey, Lisa Anne
Hayes, Alison Joy
Chhabra, Harvinder Singh
Glinsky, Joanne Valentina
Cameron, Ian Douglas
Lavrencic, Lucija
Arumugam, Narkeesh
Hossain, Sohrab
Bedi, Parneet Kaur
author_sort Arora, Mohit
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers are a common and severe complication of spinal cord injury, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries where people often need to manage pressure ulcers alone and at home. Telephone-based support may help people in these situations to manage their pressure ulcers. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support to help people with spinal cord injury manage pressure ulcers at home in India and Bangladesh. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre (3 sites), prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel, randomised controlled trial will be undertaken. 120 participants with pressure ulcers on the sacrum, ischial tuberosity or greater trochanter of the femur secondary to spinal cord injury will be randomly assigned to a Control or Intervention group. Participants in the Control group will receive usual community care. That is, they will manage their pressure ulcers on their own at home but will be free to access whatever healthcare support they can. Participants in the Intervention group will also manage their pressure ulcers at home and will also be free to access whatever healthcare support they can, but in addition they will receive weekly telephone-based support and advice for 12 weeks (15–25 min/week). The primary outcome is the size of the pressure ulcer at 12 weeks. 13 secondary outcomes will be measured reflecting other aspects of pressure ulcer resolution, depression, quality of life, participation and satisfaction with healthcare provision. An economic evaluation will be run in parallel and will include a cost-effectiveness and a cost-utility analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee at each site. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613001225707.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4521536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45215362015-08-05 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial Arora, Mohit Harvey, Lisa Anne Hayes, Alison Joy Chhabra, Harvinder Singh Glinsky, Joanne Valentina Cameron, Ian Douglas Lavrencic, Lucija Arumugam, Narkeesh Hossain, Sohrab Bedi, Parneet Kaur BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers are a common and severe complication of spinal cord injury, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries where people often need to manage pressure ulcers alone and at home. Telephone-based support may help people in these situations to manage their pressure ulcers. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support to help people with spinal cord injury manage pressure ulcers at home in India and Bangladesh. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre (3 sites), prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel, randomised controlled trial will be undertaken. 120 participants with pressure ulcers on the sacrum, ischial tuberosity or greater trochanter of the femur secondary to spinal cord injury will be randomly assigned to a Control or Intervention group. Participants in the Control group will receive usual community care. That is, they will manage their pressure ulcers on their own at home but will be free to access whatever healthcare support they can. Participants in the Intervention group will also manage their pressure ulcers at home and will also be free to access whatever healthcare support they can, but in addition they will receive weekly telephone-based support and advice for 12 weeks (15–25 min/week). The primary outcome is the size of the pressure ulcer at 12 weeks. 13 secondary outcomes will be measured reflecting other aspects of pressure ulcer resolution, depression, quality of life, participation and satisfaction with healthcare provision. An economic evaluation will be run in parallel and will include a cost-effectiveness and a cost-utility analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee at each site. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613001225707. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4521536/ /pubmed/26220871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008369 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Neurology
Arora, Mohit
Harvey, Lisa Anne
Hayes, Alison Joy
Chhabra, Harvinder Singh
Glinsky, Joanne Valentina
Cameron, Ian Douglas
Lavrencic, Lucija
Arumugam, Narkeesh
Hossain, Sohrab
Bedi, Parneet Kaur
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008369
work_keys_str_mv AT aroramohit effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harveylisaanne effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hayesalisonjoy effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chhabraharvindersingh effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT glinskyjoannevalentina effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cameroniandouglas effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lavrenciclucija effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT arumugamnarkeesh effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hossainsohrab effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bediparneetkaur effectivenessandcosteffectivenessoftelephonebasedsupportversususualcarefortreatmentofpressureulcersinpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesstudyprotocolfora12weekrandomisedcontrolledtrial