Cargando…

Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers

BACKGROUND: Vibration response imaging (VRI) is a new technology for lung imaging. Active smokers and non-smokers show differences in VRI findings, but no data are available for passive smokers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of VRI and to assess the differences in VRI findings among...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Hongying, Chen, Jichao, Cao, Jinying, Mu, Lan, Hu, Zhenyu, He, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26212715
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894335
_version_ 1782383844288102400
author Jiang, Hongying
Chen, Jichao
Cao, Jinying
Mu, Lan
Hu, Zhenyu
He, Jian
author_facet Jiang, Hongying
Chen, Jichao
Cao, Jinying
Mu, Lan
Hu, Zhenyu
He, Jian
author_sort Jiang, Hongying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vibration response imaging (VRI) is a new technology for lung imaging. Active smokers and non-smokers show differences in VRI findings, but no data are available for passive smokers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of VRI and to assess the differences in VRI findings among non-smokers, active smokers, and passive smokers. MATERIAL/METHODS: Healthy subjects (n=165: 63 non-smokers, 56 active smokers, and 46 passive smokers) with normal lung function were enrolled. Medical history, physical examination, lung function test, and VRI were performed for all subjects. Correlation between smoking index and VRI scores (VRIS) were performed. RESULTS: VRI images showed progressive and regressive stages representing the inspiratory and expiratory phases bilaterally in a vertical and synchronized manner in non-smokers. Vibration energy curves with low expiratory phase and plateau were present in 6.35% and 3.17%, respectively, of healthy non-smokers, 41.07% and 28.60% of smokers, and 39.13% and 30.43% of passive smokers, respectively. The massive energy peak in the non-smokers, smokers, and passive-smokers was 1.77±0.27, 1.57±0.29, and 1.66±0.33, respectively (all P<0.001). A weak but positive correlation was observed between VRIS and smoking index. CONCLUSIONS: VRI can intuitively show the differences between non-smokers and smokers. VRI revealed that passive smoking can also harm the lungs. VRI could be used to visually persuade smokers to give up smoking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4521697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45216972015-08-20 Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers Jiang, Hongying Chen, Jichao Cao, Jinying Mu, Lan Hu, Zhenyu He, Jian Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Vibration response imaging (VRI) is a new technology for lung imaging. Active smokers and non-smokers show differences in VRI findings, but no data are available for passive smokers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of VRI and to assess the differences in VRI findings among non-smokers, active smokers, and passive smokers. MATERIAL/METHODS: Healthy subjects (n=165: 63 non-smokers, 56 active smokers, and 46 passive smokers) with normal lung function were enrolled. Medical history, physical examination, lung function test, and VRI were performed for all subjects. Correlation between smoking index and VRI scores (VRIS) were performed. RESULTS: VRI images showed progressive and regressive stages representing the inspiratory and expiratory phases bilaterally in a vertical and synchronized manner in non-smokers. Vibration energy curves with low expiratory phase and plateau were present in 6.35% and 3.17%, respectively, of healthy non-smokers, 41.07% and 28.60% of smokers, and 39.13% and 30.43% of passive smokers, respectively. The massive energy peak in the non-smokers, smokers, and passive-smokers was 1.77±0.27, 1.57±0.29, and 1.66±0.33, respectively (all P<0.001). A weak but positive correlation was observed between VRIS and smoking index. CONCLUSIONS: VRI can intuitively show the differences between non-smokers and smokers. VRI revealed that passive smoking can also harm the lungs. VRI could be used to visually persuade smokers to give up smoking. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4521697/ /pubmed/26212715 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894335 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Jiang, Hongying
Chen, Jichao
Cao, Jinying
Mu, Lan
Hu, Zhenyu
He, Jian
Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers
title Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers
title_full Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers
title_fullStr Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers
title_short Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers
title_sort evaluation of vibration response imaging (vri) technique and difference in vri indices among non-smokers, active smokers, and passive smokers
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26212715
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894335
work_keys_str_mv AT jianghongying evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers
AT chenjichao evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers
AT caojinying evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers
AT mulan evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers
AT huzhenyu evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers
AT hejian evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers