Cargando…
Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers
BACKGROUND: Vibration response imaging (VRI) is a new technology for lung imaging. Active smokers and non-smokers show differences in VRI findings, but no data are available for passive smokers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of VRI and to assess the differences in VRI findings among...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26212715 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894335 |
_version_ | 1782383844288102400 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Hongying Chen, Jichao Cao, Jinying Mu, Lan Hu, Zhenyu He, Jian |
author_facet | Jiang, Hongying Chen, Jichao Cao, Jinying Mu, Lan Hu, Zhenyu He, Jian |
author_sort | Jiang, Hongying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vibration response imaging (VRI) is a new technology for lung imaging. Active smokers and non-smokers show differences in VRI findings, but no data are available for passive smokers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of VRI and to assess the differences in VRI findings among non-smokers, active smokers, and passive smokers. MATERIAL/METHODS: Healthy subjects (n=165: 63 non-smokers, 56 active smokers, and 46 passive smokers) with normal lung function were enrolled. Medical history, physical examination, lung function test, and VRI were performed for all subjects. Correlation between smoking index and VRI scores (VRIS) were performed. RESULTS: VRI images showed progressive and regressive stages representing the inspiratory and expiratory phases bilaterally in a vertical and synchronized manner in non-smokers. Vibration energy curves with low expiratory phase and plateau were present in 6.35% and 3.17%, respectively, of healthy non-smokers, 41.07% and 28.60% of smokers, and 39.13% and 30.43% of passive smokers, respectively. The massive energy peak in the non-smokers, smokers, and passive-smokers was 1.77±0.27, 1.57±0.29, and 1.66±0.33, respectively (all P<0.001). A weak but positive correlation was observed between VRIS and smoking index. CONCLUSIONS: VRI can intuitively show the differences between non-smokers and smokers. VRI revealed that passive smoking can also harm the lungs. VRI could be used to visually persuade smokers to give up smoking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4521697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45216972015-08-20 Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers Jiang, Hongying Chen, Jichao Cao, Jinying Mu, Lan Hu, Zhenyu He, Jian Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Vibration response imaging (VRI) is a new technology for lung imaging. Active smokers and non-smokers show differences in VRI findings, but no data are available for passive smokers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of VRI and to assess the differences in VRI findings among non-smokers, active smokers, and passive smokers. MATERIAL/METHODS: Healthy subjects (n=165: 63 non-smokers, 56 active smokers, and 46 passive smokers) with normal lung function were enrolled. Medical history, physical examination, lung function test, and VRI were performed for all subjects. Correlation between smoking index and VRI scores (VRIS) were performed. RESULTS: VRI images showed progressive and regressive stages representing the inspiratory and expiratory phases bilaterally in a vertical and synchronized manner in non-smokers. Vibration energy curves with low expiratory phase and plateau were present in 6.35% and 3.17%, respectively, of healthy non-smokers, 41.07% and 28.60% of smokers, and 39.13% and 30.43% of passive smokers, respectively. The massive energy peak in the non-smokers, smokers, and passive-smokers was 1.77±0.27, 1.57±0.29, and 1.66±0.33, respectively (all P<0.001). A weak but positive correlation was observed between VRIS and smoking index. CONCLUSIONS: VRI can intuitively show the differences between non-smokers and smokers. VRI revealed that passive smoking can also harm the lungs. VRI could be used to visually persuade smokers to give up smoking. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4521697/ /pubmed/26212715 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894335 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Jiang, Hongying Chen, Jichao Cao, Jinying Mu, Lan Hu, Zhenyu He, Jian Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers |
title | Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers |
title_full | Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers |
title_short | Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers, and Passive Smokers |
title_sort | evaluation of vibration response imaging (vri) technique and difference in vri indices among non-smokers, active smokers, and passive smokers |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26212715 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jianghongying evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers AT chenjichao evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers AT caojinying evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers AT mulan evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers AT huzhenyu evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers AT hejian evaluationofvibrationresponseimagingvritechniqueanddifferenceinvriindicesamongnonsmokersactivesmokersandpassivesmokers |