Cargando…
Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Raven Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047 |
_version_ | 1782383880448245760 |
---|---|
author | Moisseiev, Elad Zunz, Eran Tzur, Rotem Kurtz, Shimon Shemesh, Gabi |
author_facet | Moisseiev, Elad Zunz, Eran Tzur, Rotem Kurtz, Shimon Shemesh, Gabi |
author_sort | Moisseiev, Elad |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June 2012 was conducted. Of these, 61 (61%) eyes underwent trabeculectomy and 39 (39%) eyes underwent Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Demographic information, glaucoma type, surgical details, preoperative, and postoperative data including intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, reoperation, and occurrence of any complications were recorded. RESULTS: No differences in IOP reduction or number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications were demonstrated between the 2 procedures. Success rates were 86.9% for trabeculectomy and 84.6% for Ex-PRESS shunt. Rates of failure and hypotony were not significantly different between the groups. No parameter was correlated with success or failure of any procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Standard trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS shunt have similar efficacy and safety profiles. As the Ex-PRESS shunt is considerably more expensive, its use may be unjustified, especially as a primary procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4521900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Raven Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45219002015-08-11 Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review Moisseiev, Elad Zunz, Eran Tzur, Rotem Kurtz, Shimon Shemesh, Gabi J Glaucoma Original Studies PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June 2012 was conducted. Of these, 61 (61%) eyes underwent trabeculectomy and 39 (39%) eyes underwent Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Demographic information, glaucoma type, surgical details, preoperative, and postoperative data including intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, reoperation, and occurrence of any complications were recorded. RESULTS: No differences in IOP reduction or number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications were demonstrated between the 2 procedures. Success rates were 86.9% for trabeculectomy and 84.6% for Ex-PRESS shunt. Rates of failure and hypotony were not significantly different between the groups. No parameter was correlated with success or failure of any procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Standard trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS shunt have similar efficacy and safety profiles. As the Ex-PRESS shunt is considerably more expensive, its use may be unjustified, especially as a primary procedure. Raven Press 2015-08 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4521900/ /pubmed/24633088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Studies Moisseiev, Elad Zunz, Eran Tzur, Rotem Kurtz, Shimon Shemesh, Gabi Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review |
title | Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review |
title_full | Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review |
title_short | Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review |
title_sort | standard trabeculectomy and ex-press miniature glaucoma shunt: a comparative study and literature review |
topic | Original Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moisseievelad standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview AT zunzeran standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview AT tzurrotem standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview AT kurtzshimon standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview AT shemeshgabi standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview |