Cargando…

Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moisseiev, Elad, Zunz, Eran, Tzur, Rotem, Kurtz, Shimon, Shemesh, Gabi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Raven Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047
_version_ 1782383880448245760
author Moisseiev, Elad
Zunz, Eran
Tzur, Rotem
Kurtz, Shimon
Shemesh, Gabi
author_facet Moisseiev, Elad
Zunz, Eran
Tzur, Rotem
Kurtz, Shimon
Shemesh, Gabi
author_sort Moisseiev, Elad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June 2012 was conducted. Of these, 61 (61%) eyes underwent trabeculectomy and 39 (39%) eyes underwent Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Demographic information, glaucoma type, surgical details, preoperative, and postoperative data including intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, reoperation, and occurrence of any complications were recorded. RESULTS: No differences in IOP reduction or number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications were demonstrated between the 2 procedures. Success rates were 86.9% for trabeculectomy and 84.6% for Ex-PRESS shunt. Rates of failure and hypotony were not significantly different between the groups. No parameter was correlated with success or failure of any procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Standard trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS shunt have similar efficacy and safety profiles. As the Ex-PRESS shunt is considerably more expensive, its use may be unjustified, especially as a primary procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4521900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Raven Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45219002015-08-11 Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review Moisseiev, Elad Zunz, Eran Tzur, Rotem Kurtz, Shimon Shemesh, Gabi J Glaucoma Original Studies PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June 2012 was conducted. Of these, 61 (61%) eyes underwent trabeculectomy and 39 (39%) eyes underwent Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Demographic information, glaucoma type, surgical details, preoperative, and postoperative data including intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, reoperation, and occurrence of any complications were recorded. RESULTS: No differences in IOP reduction or number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications were demonstrated between the 2 procedures. Success rates were 86.9% for trabeculectomy and 84.6% for Ex-PRESS shunt. Rates of failure and hypotony were not significantly different between the groups. No parameter was correlated with success or failure of any procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Standard trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS shunt have similar efficacy and safety profiles. As the Ex-PRESS shunt is considerably more expensive, its use may be unjustified, especially as a primary procedure. Raven Press 2015-08 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4521900/ /pubmed/24633088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Studies
Moisseiev, Elad
Zunz, Eran
Tzur, Rotem
Kurtz, Shimon
Shemesh, Gabi
Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review
title Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review
title_full Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review
title_fullStr Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review
title_short Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review
title_sort standard trabeculectomy and ex-press miniature glaucoma shunt: a comparative study and literature review
topic Original Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047
work_keys_str_mv AT moisseievelad standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview
AT zunzeran standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview
AT tzurrotem standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview
AT kurtzshimon standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview
AT shemeshgabi standardtrabeculectomyandexpressminiatureglaucomashuntacomparativestudyandliteraturereview