Cargando…

A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods

BACKGROUND: The interpretation of HIV prevalence trends is increasingly difficult as antiretroviral treatment programs expand. Reliable HIV incidence estimates are critical to monitoring transmission trends and guiding an effective national response to the epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used a r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rehle, Thomas, Johnson, Leigh, Hallett, Timothy, Mahy, Mary, Kim, Andrea, Odido, Helen, Onoya, Dorina, Jooste, Sean, Shisana, Olive, Puren, Adrian, Parekh, Bharat, Stover, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26230949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133255
_version_ 1782383891206635520
author Rehle, Thomas
Johnson, Leigh
Hallett, Timothy
Mahy, Mary
Kim, Andrea
Odido, Helen
Onoya, Dorina
Jooste, Sean
Shisana, Olive
Puren, Adrian
Parekh, Bharat
Stover, John
author_facet Rehle, Thomas
Johnson, Leigh
Hallett, Timothy
Mahy, Mary
Kim, Andrea
Odido, Helen
Onoya, Dorina
Jooste, Sean
Shisana, Olive
Puren, Adrian
Parekh, Bharat
Stover, John
author_sort Rehle, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The interpretation of HIV prevalence trends is increasingly difficult as antiretroviral treatment programs expand. Reliable HIV incidence estimates are critical to monitoring transmission trends and guiding an effective national response to the epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used a range of methods to estimate HIV incidence in South Africa: (i) an incidence testing algorithm applying the Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay (LAg-Avidity EIA) in combination with antiretroviral drug and HIV viral load testing; (ii) a modelling technique based on the synthetic cohort principle; and (iii) two dynamic mathematical models, the EPP/Spectrum model package and the Thembisa model. Overall, the different incidence estimation methods were in broad agreement on HIV incidence estimates among persons aged 15-49 years in 2012. The assay-based method produced slightly higher estimates of incidence, 1.72% (95% CI 1.38 – 2.06), compared with the mathematical models, 1.47% (95% CI 1.23 – 1.72) in Thembisa and 1.52% (95% CI 1.43 – 1.62) in EPP/Spectrum, and slightly lower estimates of incidence compared to the synthetic cohort, 1.9% (95% CI 0.8 – 3.1) over the period from 2008 to 2012. Among youth aged 15-24 years, a declining trend in HIV incidence was estimated by all three mathematical estimation methods. CONCLUSIONS: The multi-method comparison showed similar levels and trends in HIV incidence and validated the estimates provided by the assay-based incidence testing algorithm. Our results confirm that South Africa is the country with the largest number of new HIV infections in the world, with about 1 000 new infections occurring each day among adults aged 15-49 years in 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4521952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45219522015-08-06 A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods Rehle, Thomas Johnson, Leigh Hallett, Timothy Mahy, Mary Kim, Andrea Odido, Helen Onoya, Dorina Jooste, Sean Shisana, Olive Puren, Adrian Parekh, Bharat Stover, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The interpretation of HIV prevalence trends is increasingly difficult as antiretroviral treatment programs expand. Reliable HIV incidence estimates are critical to monitoring transmission trends and guiding an effective national response to the epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used a range of methods to estimate HIV incidence in South Africa: (i) an incidence testing algorithm applying the Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay (LAg-Avidity EIA) in combination with antiretroviral drug and HIV viral load testing; (ii) a modelling technique based on the synthetic cohort principle; and (iii) two dynamic mathematical models, the EPP/Spectrum model package and the Thembisa model. Overall, the different incidence estimation methods were in broad agreement on HIV incidence estimates among persons aged 15-49 years in 2012. The assay-based method produced slightly higher estimates of incidence, 1.72% (95% CI 1.38 – 2.06), compared with the mathematical models, 1.47% (95% CI 1.23 – 1.72) in Thembisa and 1.52% (95% CI 1.43 – 1.62) in EPP/Spectrum, and slightly lower estimates of incidence compared to the synthetic cohort, 1.9% (95% CI 0.8 – 3.1) over the period from 2008 to 2012. Among youth aged 15-24 years, a declining trend in HIV incidence was estimated by all three mathematical estimation methods. CONCLUSIONS: The multi-method comparison showed similar levels and trends in HIV incidence and validated the estimates provided by the assay-based incidence testing algorithm. Our results confirm that South Africa is the country with the largest number of new HIV infections in the world, with about 1 000 new infections occurring each day among adults aged 15-49 years in 2012. Public Library of Science 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4521952/ /pubmed/26230949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133255 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rehle, Thomas
Johnson, Leigh
Hallett, Timothy
Mahy, Mary
Kim, Andrea
Odido, Helen
Onoya, Dorina
Jooste, Sean
Shisana, Olive
Puren, Adrian
Parekh, Bharat
Stover, John
A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods
title A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods
title_full A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods
title_fullStr A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods
title_short A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods
title_sort comparison of south african national hiv incidence estimates: a critical appraisal of different methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26230949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133255
work_keys_str_mv AT rehlethomas acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT johnsonleigh acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT halletttimothy acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT mahymary acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT kimandrea acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT odidohelen acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT onoyadorina acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT joostesean acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT shisanaolive acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT purenadrian acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT parekhbharat acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT stoverjohn acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT rehlethomas comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT johnsonleigh comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT halletttimothy comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT mahymary comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT kimandrea comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT odidohelen comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT onoyadorina comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT joostesean comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT shisanaolive comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT purenadrian comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT parekhbharat comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods
AT stoverjohn comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods