Cargando…
A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods
BACKGROUND: The interpretation of HIV prevalence trends is increasingly difficult as antiretroviral treatment programs expand. Reliable HIV incidence estimates are critical to monitoring transmission trends and guiding an effective national response to the epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used a r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26230949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133255 |
_version_ | 1782383891206635520 |
---|---|
author | Rehle, Thomas Johnson, Leigh Hallett, Timothy Mahy, Mary Kim, Andrea Odido, Helen Onoya, Dorina Jooste, Sean Shisana, Olive Puren, Adrian Parekh, Bharat Stover, John |
author_facet | Rehle, Thomas Johnson, Leigh Hallett, Timothy Mahy, Mary Kim, Andrea Odido, Helen Onoya, Dorina Jooste, Sean Shisana, Olive Puren, Adrian Parekh, Bharat Stover, John |
author_sort | Rehle, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The interpretation of HIV prevalence trends is increasingly difficult as antiretroviral treatment programs expand. Reliable HIV incidence estimates are critical to monitoring transmission trends and guiding an effective national response to the epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used a range of methods to estimate HIV incidence in South Africa: (i) an incidence testing algorithm applying the Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay (LAg-Avidity EIA) in combination with antiretroviral drug and HIV viral load testing; (ii) a modelling technique based on the synthetic cohort principle; and (iii) two dynamic mathematical models, the EPP/Spectrum model package and the Thembisa model. Overall, the different incidence estimation methods were in broad agreement on HIV incidence estimates among persons aged 15-49 years in 2012. The assay-based method produced slightly higher estimates of incidence, 1.72% (95% CI 1.38 – 2.06), compared with the mathematical models, 1.47% (95% CI 1.23 – 1.72) in Thembisa and 1.52% (95% CI 1.43 – 1.62) in EPP/Spectrum, and slightly lower estimates of incidence compared to the synthetic cohort, 1.9% (95% CI 0.8 – 3.1) over the period from 2008 to 2012. Among youth aged 15-24 years, a declining trend in HIV incidence was estimated by all three mathematical estimation methods. CONCLUSIONS: The multi-method comparison showed similar levels and trends in HIV incidence and validated the estimates provided by the assay-based incidence testing algorithm. Our results confirm that South Africa is the country with the largest number of new HIV infections in the world, with about 1 000 new infections occurring each day among adults aged 15-49 years in 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4521952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45219522015-08-06 A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods Rehle, Thomas Johnson, Leigh Hallett, Timothy Mahy, Mary Kim, Andrea Odido, Helen Onoya, Dorina Jooste, Sean Shisana, Olive Puren, Adrian Parekh, Bharat Stover, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The interpretation of HIV prevalence trends is increasingly difficult as antiretroviral treatment programs expand. Reliable HIV incidence estimates are critical to monitoring transmission trends and guiding an effective national response to the epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used a range of methods to estimate HIV incidence in South Africa: (i) an incidence testing algorithm applying the Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay (LAg-Avidity EIA) in combination with antiretroviral drug and HIV viral load testing; (ii) a modelling technique based on the synthetic cohort principle; and (iii) two dynamic mathematical models, the EPP/Spectrum model package and the Thembisa model. Overall, the different incidence estimation methods were in broad agreement on HIV incidence estimates among persons aged 15-49 years in 2012. The assay-based method produced slightly higher estimates of incidence, 1.72% (95% CI 1.38 – 2.06), compared with the mathematical models, 1.47% (95% CI 1.23 – 1.72) in Thembisa and 1.52% (95% CI 1.43 – 1.62) in EPP/Spectrum, and slightly lower estimates of incidence compared to the synthetic cohort, 1.9% (95% CI 0.8 – 3.1) over the period from 2008 to 2012. Among youth aged 15-24 years, a declining trend in HIV incidence was estimated by all three mathematical estimation methods. CONCLUSIONS: The multi-method comparison showed similar levels and trends in HIV incidence and validated the estimates provided by the assay-based incidence testing algorithm. Our results confirm that South Africa is the country with the largest number of new HIV infections in the world, with about 1 000 new infections occurring each day among adults aged 15-49 years in 2012. Public Library of Science 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4521952/ /pubmed/26230949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133255 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rehle, Thomas Johnson, Leigh Hallett, Timothy Mahy, Mary Kim, Andrea Odido, Helen Onoya, Dorina Jooste, Sean Shisana, Olive Puren, Adrian Parekh, Bharat Stover, John A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods |
title | A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods |
title_full | A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods |
title_short | A Comparison of South African National HIV Incidence Estimates: A Critical Appraisal of Different Methods |
title_sort | comparison of south african national hiv incidence estimates: a critical appraisal of different methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26230949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rehlethomas acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT johnsonleigh acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT halletttimothy acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT mahymary acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT kimandrea acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT odidohelen acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT onoyadorina acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT joostesean acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT shisanaolive acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT purenadrian acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT parekhbharat acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT stoverjohn acomparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT rehlethomas comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT johnsonleigh comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT halletttimothy comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT mahymary comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT kimandrea comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT odidohelen comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT onoyadorina comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT joostesean comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT shisanaolive comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT purenadrian comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT parekhbharat comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods AT stoverjohn comparisonofsouthafricannationalhivincidenceestimatesacriticalappraisalofdifferentmethods |