Cargando…

Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement

‘Mapping’ onto generic preference-based outcome measures is increasingly being used as a means of generating health utilities for use within health economic evaluations. Despite publication of technical guides for the conduct of mapping research, guidance for the reporting of mapping studies is curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrou, Stavros, Rivero-Arias, Oliver, Dakin, Helen, Longworth, Louise, Oppe, Mark, Froud, Robert, Gray, Alastair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26232268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0305-6
_version_ 1782383907623141376
author Petrou, Stavros
Rivero-Arias, Oliver
Dakin, Helen
Longworth, Louise
Oppe, Mark
Froud, Robert
Gray, Alastair
author_facet Petrou, Stavros
Rivero-Arias, Oliver
Dakin, Helen
Longworth, Louise
Oppe, Mark
Froud, Robert
Gray, Alastair
author_sort Petrou, Stavros
collection PubMed
description ‘Mapping’ onto generic preference-based outcome measures is increasingly being used as a means of generating health utilities for use within health economic evaluations. Despite publication of technical guides for the conduct of mapping research, guidance for the reporting of mapping studies is currently lacking. The MAPS (MApping onto Preference-based measures reporting Standards) statement is a new checklist, which aims to promote complete and transparent reporting of mapping studies. The primary audiences for the MAPS statement are researchers reporting mapping studies, the funders of the research, and peer reviewers and editors involved in assessing mapping studies for publication. A de novo list of 29 candidate reporting items and accompanying explanations was created by a working group comprised of six health economists and one Delphi methodologist. Following a two-round, modified Delphi survey with representatives from academia, consultancy, health technology assessment agencies and the biomedical journal editorial community, a final set of 23 items deemed essential for transparent reporting, and accompanying explanations, was developed. The items are contained in a user friendly 23 item checklist. They are presented numerically and categorised within six sections, namely: (i) title and abstract; (ii) introduction; (iii) methods; (iv) results; (v) discussion; and (vi) other. The MAPS statement is best applied in conjunction with the accompanying MAPS explanation and elaboration document. It is anticipated that the MAPS statement will improve the clarity, transparency and completeness of reporting of mapping studies. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the MAPS statement is being co-published by eight health economics and quality of life journals, and broader endorsement is encouraged. The MAPS working group plans to assess the need for an update of the reporting checklist in five years’ time. This statement was published jointly in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Journal of Medical Economics, Medical Decision Making, PharmacoEconomics, and Quality of Life Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4522070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45220702015-08-02 Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement Petrou, Stavros Rivero-Arias, Oliver Dakin, Helen Longworth, Louise Oppe, Mark Froud, Robert Gray, Alastair Health Qual Life Outcomes Commentary ‘Mapping’ onto generic preference-based outcome measures is increasingly being used as a means of generating health utilities for use within health economic evaluations. Despite publication of technical guides for the conduct of mapping research, guidance for the reporting of mapping studies is currently lacking. The MAPS (MApping onto Preference-based measures reporting Standards) statement is a new checklist, which aims to promote complete and transparent reporting of mapping studies. The primary audiences for the MAPS statement are researchers reporting mapping studies, the funders of the research, and peer reviewers and editors involved in assessing mapping studies for publication. A de novo list of 29 candidate reporting items and accompanying explanations was created by a working group comprised of six health economists and one Delphi methodologist. Following a two-round, modified Delphi survey with representatives from academia, consultancy, health technology assessment agencies and the biomedical journal editorial community, a final set of 23 items deemed essential for transparent reporting, and accompanying explanations, was developed. The items are contained in a user friendly 23 item checklist. They are presented numerically and categorised within six sections, namely: (i) title and abstract; (ii) introduction; (iii) methods; (iv) results; (v) discussion; and (vi) other. The MAPS statement is best applied in conjunction with the accompanying MAPS explanation and elaboration document. It is anticipated that the MAPS statement will improve the clarity, transparency and completeness of reporting of mapping studies. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the MAPS statement is being co-published by eight health economics and quality of life journals, and broader endorsement is encouraged. The MAPS working group plans to assess the need for an update of the reporting checklist in five years’ time. This statement was published jointly in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Journal of Medical Economics, Medical Decision Making, PharmacoEconomics, and Quality of Life Research. BioMed Central 2015-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4522070/ /pubmed/26232268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0305-6 Text en © Petrou et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Petrou, Stavros
Rivero-Arias, Oliver
Dakin, Helen
Longworth, Louise
Oppe, Mark
Froud, Robert
Gray, Alastair
Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement
title Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement
title_full Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement
title_fullStr Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement
title_full_unstemmed Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement
title_short Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement
title_sort preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: the maps statement
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26232268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0305-6
work_keys_str_mv AT petroustavros preferredreportingitemsforstudiesmappingontopreferencebasedoutcomemeasuresthemapsstatement
AT riveroariasoliver preferredreportingitemsforstudiesmappingontopreferencebasedoutcomemeasuresthemapsstatement
AT dakinhelen preferredreportingitemsforstudiesmappingontopreferencebasedoutcomemeasuresthemapsstatement
AT longworthlouise preferredreportingitemsforstudiesmappingontopreferencebasedoutcomemeasuresthemapsstatement
AT oppemark preferredreportingitemsforstudiesmappingontopreferencebasedoutcomemeasuresthemapsstatement
AT froudrobert preferredreportingitemsforstudiesmappingontopreferencebasedoutcomemeasuresthemapsstatement
AT grayalastair preferredreportingitemsforstudiesmappingontopreferencebasedoutcomemeasuresthemapsstatement