Cargando…

Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial self-medication is common in most low and middle income countries (LMICs). However there has been no systematic review on non-prescription antimicrobial use in these settings. This review thus intended to establish the burden, risk factors and effects of antimicrobial self-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ocan, Moses, Obuku, Ekwaro A., Bwanga, Freddie, Akena, Dickens, Richard, Sennono, Ogwal-Okeng, Jasper, Obua, Celestino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26231758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2109-3
_version_ 1782383910528745472
author Ocan, Moses
Obuku, Ekwaro A.
Bwanga, Freddie
Akena, Dickens
Richard, Sennono
Ogwal-Okeng, Jasper
Obua, Celestino
author_facet Ocan, Moses
Obuku, Ekwaro A.
Bwanga, Freddie
Akena, Dickens
Richard, Sennono
Ogwal-Okeng, Jasper
Obua, Celestino
author_sort Ocan, Moses
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial self-medication is common in most low and middle income countries (LMICs). However there has been no systematic review on non-prescription antimicrobial use in these settings. This review thus intended to establish the burden, risk factors and effects of antimicrobial self-medication in Low and Middle Income Countries. METHODS: In 2012, we registered a systematic review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42012002508). We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases using the following terms; “self-medication”, “non-prescription”, ‘self-treatment’, “antimicrobial”, “antimalarial”, “antibiotic”, “antibacterial” “2002-2012” and combining them using Boolean operators. We performed independent and duplicate screening and abstraction of study administrative data, prevalence, determinants, type of antimicrobial agent, source, disease conditions, inappropriate use, drug adverse events and clinical outcomes of antibiotic self-medication where possible. We performed a Random Effects Meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of thirty four (34) studies involving 31,340 participants were included in the review. The overall prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication was 38.8 % (95 % CI: 29.5-48.1). Most studies assessed non-prescription use of antibacterial (17/34: 50 %) and antimalarial (5/34: 14.7 %) agents. The common disease symptoms managed were, respiratory (50 %), fever (47 %) and gastrointestinal (45 %). The major sources of antimicrobials included, pharmacies (65.5 %), leftover drugs (50 %) and drug shops (37.5 %). Twelve (12) studies reported inappropriate drug use; not completing dose (6/12) and sharing of medicines (4/12). The main determinants of antimicrobial self-medication include, level of education, age, gender, past successful use, severity of illness and income. Reported negative outcomes of antimicrobial self-medication included, allergies (2/34: 5.9 %), lack of cure (4/34: 11.8 %) and causing death (2/34: 5.9 %). The commonly reported positive outcome was recovery from illness (4/34: 11.8 %). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication is high and varies in different communities as well as by social determinants of health and is frequently associated with inappropriate drug use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2109-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4522083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45220832015-08-02 Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries Ocan, Moses Obuku, Ekwaro A. Bwanga, Freddie Akena, Dickens Richard, Sennono Ogwal-Okeng, Jasper Obua, Celestino BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial self-medication is common in most low and middle income countries (LMICs). However there has been no systematic review on non-prescription antimicrobial use in these settings. This review thus intended to establish the burden, risk factors and effects of antimicrobial self-medication in Low and Middle Income Countries. METHODS: In 2012, we registered a systematic review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42012002508). We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases using the following terms; “self-medication”, “non-prescription”, ‘self-treatment’, “antimicrobial”, “antimalarial”, “antibiotic”, “antibacterial” “2002-2012” and combining them using Boolean operators. We performed independent and duplicate screening and abstraction of study administrative data, prevalence, determinants, type of antimicrobial agent, source, disease conditions, inappropriate use, drug adverse events and clinical outcomes of antibiotic self-medication where possible. We performed a Random Effects Meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of thirty four (34) studies involving 31,340 participants were included in the review. The overall prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication was 38.8 % (95 % CI: 29.5-48.1). Most studies assessed non-prescription use of antibacterial (17/34: 50 %) and antimalarial (5/34: 14.7 %) agents. The common disease symptoms managed were, respiratory (50 %), fever (47 %) and gastrointestinal (45 %). The major sources of antimicrobials included, pharmacies (65.5 %), leftover drugs (50 %) and drug shops (37.5 %). Twelve (12) studies reported inappropriate drug use; not completing dose (6/12) and sharing of medicines (4/12). The main determinants of antimicrobial self-medication include, level of education, age, gender, past successful use, severity of illness and income. Reported negative outcomes of antimicrobial self-medication included, allergies (2/34: 5.9 %), lack of cure (4/34: 11.8 %) and causing death (2/34: 5.9 %). The commonly reported positive outcome was recovery from illness (4/34: 11.8 %). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication is high and varies in different communities as well as by social determinants of health and is frequently associated with inappropriate drug use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2109-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4522083/ /pubmed/26231758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2109-3 Text en © Ocan et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ocan, Moses
Obuku, Ekwaro A.
Bwanga, Freddie
Akena, Dickens
Richard, Sennono
Ogwal-Okeng, Jasper
Obua, Celestino
Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries
title Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries
title_full Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries
title_fullStr Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries
title_full_unstemmed Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries
title_short Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries
title_sort household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26231758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2109-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ocanmoses householdantimicrobialselfmedicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheburdenriskfactorsandoutcomesindevelopingcountries
AT obukuekwaroa householdantimicrobialselfmedicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheburdenriskfactorsandoutcomesindevelopingcountries
AT bwangafreddie householdantimicrobialselfmedicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheburdenriskfactorsandoutcomesindevelopingcountries
AT akenadickens householdantimicrobialselfmedicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheburdenriskfactorsandoutcomesindevelopingcountries
AT richardsennono householdantimicrobialselfmedicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheburdenriskfactorsandoutcomesindevelopingcountries
AT ogwalokengjasper householdantimicrobialselfmedicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheburdenriskfactorsandoutcomesindevelopingcountries
AT obuacelestino householdantimicrobialselfmedicationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheburdenriskfactorsandoutcomesindevelopingcountries