Cargando…
Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism
[Image: see text] Elastic and inelastic close-coupling (CC) calculations have been used to extract information about the corrugation amplitude and the surface vibrational atomic displacement by fitting to several experimental diffraction patterns. To model the three-dimensional interaction between t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical
Society
2015
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05010 |
_version_ | 1782383995594473472 |
---|---|
author | Kraus, P. Tamtögl, A. Mayrhofer-Reinhartshuber, M. Apolloner, F. Gösweiner, Ch. Miret-Artés, S. Ernst, W.E. |
author_facet | Kraus, P. Tamtögl, A. Mayrhofer-Reinhartshuber, M. Apolloner, F. Gösweiner, Ch. Miret-Artés, S. Ernst, W.E. |
author_sort | Kraus, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Elastic and inelastic close-coupling (CC) calculations have been used to extract information about the corrugation amplitude and the surface vibrational atomic displacement by fitting to several experimental diffraction patterns. To model the three-dimensional interaction between the He atom and the Bi(111) surface under investigation, a corrugated Morse potential has been assumed. Two different types of calculations are used to obtain theoretical diffraction intensities at three surface temperatures along the two symmetry directions. Type one consists of solving the elastic CC (eCC) and attenuating the corresponding diffraction intensities by a global Debye–Waller (DW) factor. The second one, within a unitary theory, is derived from merely solving the inelastic CC (iCC) equations, where no DW factor is necessary to include. While both methods arrive at similar predictions for the peak-to-peak corrugation value, the variance of the value obtained by the iCC method is much better. Furthermore, the more extensive calculation is better suited to model the temperature induced signal asymmetries and renders the inclusion for a second Debye temperature for the diffraction peaks futile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4522698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | American Chemical
Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45226982015-08-07 Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism Kraus, P. Tamtögl, A. Mayrhofer-Reinhartshuber, M. Apolloner, F. Gösweiner, Ch. Miret-Artés, S. Ernst, W.E. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces [Image: see text] Elastic and inelastic close-coupling (CC) calculations have been used to extract information about the corrugation amplitude and the surface vibrational atomic displacement by fitting to several experimental diffraction patterns. To model the three-dimensional interaction between the He atom and the Bi(111) surface under investigation, a corrugated Morse potential has been assumed. Two different types of calculations are used to obtain theoretical diffraction intensities at three surface temperatures along the two symmetry directions. Type one consists of solving the elastic CC (eCC) and attenuating the corresponding diffraction intensities by a global Debye–Waller (DW) factor. The second one, within a unitary theory, is derived from merely solving the inelastic CC (iCC) equations, where no DW factor is necessary to include. While both methods arrive at similar predictions for the peak-to-peak corrugation value, the variance of the value obtained by the iCC method is much better. Furthermore, the more extensive calculation is better suited to model the temperature induced signal asymmetries and renders the inclusion for a second Debye temperature for the diffraction peaks futile. American Chemical Society 2015-07-09 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4522698/ /pubmed/26257838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05010 Text en Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Kraus, P. Tamtögl, A. Mayrhofer-Reinhartshuber, M. Apolloner, F. Gösweiner, Ch. Miret-Artés, S. Ernst, W.E. Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism |
title | Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering
Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism |
title_full | Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering
Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism |
title_fullStr | Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering
Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering
Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism |
title_short | Surface Structure of Bi(111) from Helium Atom Scattering
Measurements. Inelastic Close-Coupling Formalism |
title_sort | surface structure of bi(111) from helium atom scattering
measurements. inelastic close-coupling formalism |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krausp surfacestructureofbi111fromheliumatomscatteringmeasurementsinelasticclosecouplingformalism AT tamtogla surfacestructureofbi111fromheliumatomscatteringmeasurementsinelasticclosecouplingformalism AT mayrhoferreinhartshuberm surfacestructureofbi111fromheliumatomscatteringmeasurementsinelasticclosecouplingformalism AT apollonerf surfacestructureofbi111fromheliumatomscatteringmeasurementsinelasticclosecouplingformalism AT gosweinerch surfacestructureofbi111fromheliumatomscatteringmeasurementsinelasticclosecouplingformalism AT miretartess surfacestructureofbi111fromheliumatomscatteringmeasurementsinelasticclosecouplingformalism AT ernstwe surfacestructureofbi111fromheliumatomscatteringmeasurementsinelasticclosecouplingformalism |