Cargando…

Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy

BACKGROUND: It can be challenging to convince asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic patients to pursue treatment of their atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that once in sinus rhythm, asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic patients would realize they were compensating for moderate symptoms, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, David Ryan, Mehta, Neil D., Gehi, Anil K., Pursell, Irion, Mounsey, Paul, Kumar, Prabhat, Bamimore, Ayo, Chung, Eugene H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251683
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2209w
_version_ 1782384022268149760
author King, David Ryan
Mehta, Neil D.
Gehi, Anil K.
Pursell, Irion
Mounsey, Paul
Kumar, Prabhat
Bamimore, Ayo
Chung, Eugene H.
author_facet King, David Ryan
Mehta, Neil D.
Gehi, Anil K.
Pursell, Irion
Mounsey, Paul
Kumar, Prabhat
Bamimore, Ayo
Chung, Eugene H.
author_sort King, David Ryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It can be challenging to convince asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic patients to pursue treatment of their atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that once in sinus rhythm, asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic patients would realize they were compensating for moderate symptoms, and that we could quantify this via the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity of AF (CCS-SAF) score. METHODS: All patients in our study come from the Symptom Mitigation in Atrial Fibrillation (SMART) study. Upon enrollment all patients were assigned a CCS-SAF score. Patients receiving a CCS-SAF score of 0 or 1 that elected to pursue intervention were contacted by phone and asked about their symptoms post-intervention as compared to pre-intervention. Paired t-test was used for analysis. RESULTS: Out of 800 patients in the SMART study to date, 48 patients have qualified for our phone survey and presented for follow-up in our clinic. In our cohort, the revised pre-intervention CCS-SAF score was 1.69 ± 1.36 and the post-intervention CCS-SAF score was 0.52 ± 0.80. Thirty-seven patients reported symptom improvement; those who improved were on average 72.4% improved from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic AF patients benefit from therapy and should be offered intervention despite lack of symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4522986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45229862015-08-06 Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy King, David Ryan Mehta, Neil D. Gehi, Anil K. Pursell, Irion Mounsey, Paul Kumar, Prabhat Bamimore, Ayo Chung, Eugene H. J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: It can be challenging to convince asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic patients to pursue treatment of their atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that once in sinus rhythm, asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic patients would realize they were compensating for moderate symptoms, and that we could quantify this via the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity of AF (CCS-SAF) score. METHODS: All patients in our study come from the Symptom Mitigation in Atrial Fibrillation (SMART) study. Upon enrollment all patients were assigned a CCS-SAF score. Patients receiving a CCS-SAF score of 0 or 1 that elected to pursue intervention were contacted by phone and asked about their symptoms post-intervention as compared to pre-intervention. Paired t-test was used for analysis. RESULTS: Out of 800 patients in the SMART study to date, 48 patients have qualified for our phone survey and presented for follow-up in our clinic. In our cohort, the revised pre-intervention CCS-SAF score was 1.69 ± 1.36 and the post-intervention CCS-SAF score was 0.52 ± 0.80. Thirty-seven patients reported symptom improvement; those who improved were on average 72.4% improved from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic AF patients benefit from therapy and should be offered intervention despite lack of symptoms. Elmer Press 2015-09 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4522986/ /pubmed/26251683 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2209w Text en Copyright 2015, King et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
King, David Ryan
Mehta, Neil D.
Gehi, Anil K.
Pursell, Irion
Mounsey, Paul
Kumar, Prabhat
Bamimore, Ayo
Chung, Eugene H.
Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy
title Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy
title_full Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy
title_fullStr Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy
title_short Minimally Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Patients Derive Significant Symptom Relief Following Rate Control or Rhythm Control Therapy
title_sort minimally symptomatic atrial fibrillation patients derive significant symptom relief following rate control or rhythm control therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251683
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2209w
work_keys_str_mv AT kingdavidryan minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy
AT mehtaneild minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy
AT gehianilk minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy
AT pursellirion minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy
AT mounseypaul minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy
AT kumarprabhat minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy
AT bamimoreayo minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy
AT chungeugeneh minimallysymptomaticatrialfibrillationpatientsderivesignificantsymptomrelieffollowingratecontrolorrhythmcontroltherapy