Cargando…

Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study

The in vivo electrochemical behavior of titanium nitride (TiN) nerve stimulation electrodes was compared to their in vitro behavior for a period of 90 days. Ten electrodes were implanted in two Göttingen minipigs. Four of these were used for electrical stimulation and electrochemical measurements. F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meijs, Suzan, Fjorback, Morten, Jensen, Carina, Sørensen, Søren, Rechendorff, Kristian, Rijkhoff, Nico J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4523782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00268
_version_ 1782384110333853696
author Meijs, Suzan
Fjorback, Morten
Jensen, Carina
Sørensen, Søren
Rechendorff, Kristian
Rijkhoff, Nico J. M.
author_facet Meijs, Suzan
Fjorback, Morten
Jensen, Carina
Sørensen, Søren
Rechendorff, Kristian
Rijkhoff, Nico J. M.
author_sort Meijs, Suzan
collection PubMed
description The in vivo electrochemical behavior of titanium nitride (TiN) nerve stimulation electrodes was compared to their in vitro behavior for a period of 90 days. Ten electrodes were implanted in two Göttingen minipigs. Four of these were used for electrical stimulation and electrochemical measurements. Five electrodes were kept in Ringer's solution at 37.5°C, of which four were used for electrical stimulation and electrochemical measurements. The voltage transients measured in vivo were 13 times greater than in vitro at implantation and they continued to increase with time. The electrochemical properties in vivo and the tissue resistance (R(tissue)) followed a similar trend with time. There was no consistent significant difference between the electrochemical properties of the in vivo and in vitro electrodes after the implanted period. The differences between the in vivo and in vitro electrodes during the implanted period show that the evaluation of electrochemical performance of implantable stimulation electrodes cannot be substituted with in vitro measurements. After the implanted period, however, the performance of the in vivo and in vitro electrodes in saline was similar. In addition, the changes observed over time during the post-implantation period regarding the electrochemical properties of the in vivo electrodes and R(tissue) were similar, which indicates that these changes are due to the foreign body response to implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4523782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45237822015-08-21 Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study Meijs, Suzan Fjorback, Morten Jensen, Carina Sørensen, Søren Rechendorff, Kristian Rijkhoff, Nico J. M. Front Neurosci Neuroscience The in vivo electrochemical behavior of titanium nitride (TiN) nerve stimulation electrodes was compared to their in vitro behavior for a period of 90 days. Ten electrodes were implanted in two Göttingen minipigs. Four of these were used for electrical stimulation and electrochemical measurements. Five electrodes were kept in Ringer's solution at 37.5°C, of which four were used for electrical stimulation and electrochemical measurements. The voltage transients measured in vivo were 13 times greater than in vitro at implantation and they continued to increase with time. The electrochemical properties in vivo and the tissue resistance (R(tissue)) followed a similar trend with time. There was no consistent significant difference between the electrochemical properties of the in vivo and in vitro electrodes after the implanted period. The differences between the in vivo and in vitro electrodes during the implanted period show that the evaluation of electrochemical performance of implantable stimulation electrodes cannot be substituted with in vitro measurements. After the implanted period, however, the performance of the in vivo and in vitro electrodes in saline was similar. In addition, the changes observed over time during the post-implantation period regarding the electrochemical properties of the in vivo electrodes and R(tissue) were similar, which indicates that these changes are due to the foreign body response to implantation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4523782/ /pubmed/26300717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00268 Text en Copyright © 2015 Meijs, Fjorback, Jensen, Sørensen, Rechendorff and Rijkhoff. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Meijs, Suzan
Fjorback, Morten
Jensen, Carina
Sørensen, Søren
Rechendorff, Kristian
Rijkhoff, Nico J. M.
Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study
title Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study
title_full Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study
title_fullStr Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study
title_short Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study
title_sort electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4523782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00268
work_keys_str_mv AT meijssuzan electrochemicalpropertiesoftitaniumnitridenervestimulationelectrodesaninvitroandinvivostudy
AT fjorbackmorten electrochemicalpropertiesoftitaniumnitridenervestimulationelectrodesaninvitroandinvivostudy
AT jensencarina electrochemicalpropertiesoftitaniumnitridenervestimulationelectrodesaninvitroandinvivostudy
AT sørensensøren electrochemicalpropertiesoftitaniumnitridenervestimulationelectrodesaninvitroandinvivostudy
AT rechendorffkristian electrochemicalpropertiesoftitaniumnitridenervestimulationelectrodesaninvitroandinvivostudy
AT rijkhoffnicojm electrochemicalpropertiesoftitaniumnitridenervestimulationelectrodesaninvitroandinvivostudy