Cargando…
Correcting for the study bias associated with protein–protein interaction measurements reveals differences between protein degree distributions from different cancer types
Protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks are associated with multiple types of biases partly rooted in technical limitations of the experimental techniques. Another source of bias are the different frequencies with which proteins have been studied for interaction partners. It is generally believed...
Autores principales: | Schaefer, Martin H., Serrano, Luis, Andrade-Navarro, Miguel A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4523822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00260 |
Ejemplares similares
-
MIPPIE: the mouse integrated protein–protein interaction reference
por: Alanis-Lobato, Gregorio, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Adding Protein Context to the Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network to Reveal Meaningful Interactions
por: Schaefer, Martin H., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Reconstruction and Functional Annotation of P311 Protein–Protein Interaction Network Reveals Its New Functions
por: Wang, Song, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Evolution and function of CAG/polyglutamine repeats in protein–protein interaction networks
por: Schaefer, Martin H., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Corrigendum: Reconstruction and Functional Annotation of P311 Protein–Protein Interaction Network Reveals Its New Functions
por: Wang, Song, et al.
Publicado: (2019)