Cargando…

Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model

BACKGROUND: For end-users of diabetes models that include UKPDS 82 risk equations, an important question is how well these new equations perform. Consequently, the principal objective of this study was to validate the UKPDS 82 risk equations, embedded within an established type 2 diabetes mellitus (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McEwan, Philip, Ward, Thomas, Bennett, Hayley, Bergenheim, Klas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-015-0038-8
_version_ 1782384162236268544
author McEwan, Philip
Ward, Thomas
Bennett, Hayley
Bergenheim, Klas
author_facet McEwan, Philip
Ward, Thomas
Bennett, Hayley
Bergenheim, Klas
author_sort McEwan, Philip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For end-users of diabetes models that include UKPDS 82 risk equations, an important question is how well these new equations perform. Consequently, the principal objective of this study was to validate the UKPDS 82 risk equations, embedded within an established type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) model, the Cardiff Diabetes Model, to contemporary T2DM outcomes studies. METHODS: A total of 100 validation endpoints were simulated across treatment arms of twelve pivotal T2DM outcomes studies, simulation cohorts representing each validation study’s cohort profile were generated and intensive and conventional treatment arms were defined in the Cardiff Diabetes Model. RESULTS: Overall the validation coefficient of determination was similar between both sets of risk equations: UKPDS 68, R(2) = 0.851; UKPDS 82, R(2) = 0.870. Results stratified by internal and external validation studies produced MAPE of 43.77 and 37.82%, respectively, when using UKPDS 82, and MAPE of 40.49 and 53.92%, respectively when using UKPDS 68. Areas of lack of fit, as measured by MAPE were inconsistent between sets of equations with ACCORD demonstrating a noteworthy lack of fit with UKPPDS 68 (MAPE = 170.88%) and the ADDITION study for UKPDS 82 (MAPE = 89.90%). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that the UKPDS 82 equations exhibit similar levels of external validity to the UKPDS 68 equations with the additional benefit of enabling more diabetes related endpoints to be modeled.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4524168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45241682015-08-05 Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model McEwan, Philip Ward, Thomas Bennett, Hayley Bergenheim, Klas Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: For end-users of diabetes models that include UKPDS 82 risk equations, an important question is how well these new equations perform. Consequently, the principal objective of this study was to validate the UKPDS 82 risk equations, embedded within an established type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) model, the Cardiff Diabetes Model, to contemporary T2DM outcomes studies. METHODS: A total of 100 validation endpoints were simulated across treatment arms of twelve pivotal T2DM outcomes studies, simulation cohorts representing each validation study’s cohort profile were generated and intensive and conventional treatment arms were defined in the Cardiff Diabetes Model. RESULTS: Overall the validation coefficient of determination was similar between both sets of risk equations: UKPDS 68, R(2) = 0.851; UKPDS 82, R(2) = 0.870. Results stratified by internal and external validation studies produced MAPE of 43.77 and 37.82%, respectively, when using UKPDS 82, and MAPE of 40.49 and 53.92%, respectively when using UKPDS 68. Areas of lack of fit, as measured by MAPE were inconsistent between sets of equations with ACCORD demonstrating a noteworthy lack of fit with UKPPDS 68 (MAPE = 170.88%) and the ADDITION study for UKPDS 82 (MAPE = 89.90%). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that the UKPDS 82 equations exhibit similar levels of external validity to the UKPDS 68 equations with the additional benefit of enabling more diabetes related endpoints to be modeled. BioMed Central 2015-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4524168/ /pubmed/26244041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-015-0038-8 Text en © McEwan et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
McEwan, Philip
Ward, Thomas
Bennett, Hayley
Bergenheim, Klas
Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model
title Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model
title_full Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model
title_fullStr Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model
title_short Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model
title_sort validation of the ukpds 82 risk equations within the cardiff diabetes model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-015-0038-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mcewanphilip validationoftheukpds82riskequationswithinthecardiffdiabetesmodel
AT wardthomas validationoftheukpds82riskequationswithinthecardiffdiabetesmodel
AT bennetthayley validationoftheukpds82riskequationswithinthecardiffdiabetesmodel
AT bergenheimklas validationoftheukpds82riskequationswithinthecardiffdiabetesmodel