Cargando…

A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction

Although procedure time analyses are important for operating room management, it is not easy to extract useful information from clinical procedure time data. A novel approach was proposed to analyze procedure time during anesthetic induction. A two-step regression analysis was performed to explore i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Hsin-Lun, Chang, Wen-Kuei, Hu, Ken-Hua, Langford, Richard M., Tsou, Mei-Yung, Chang, Kuang-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134838
_version_ 1782384216448696320
author Wu, Hsin-Lun
Chang, Wen-Kuei
Hu, Ken-Hua
Langford, Richard M.
Tsou, Mei-Yung
Chang, Kuang-Yi
author_facet Wu, Hsin-Lun
Chang, Wen-Kuei
Hu, Ken-Hua
Langford, Richard M.
Tsou, Mei-Yung
Chang, Kuang-Yi
author_sort Wu, Hsin-Lun
collection PubMed
description Although procedure time analyses are important for operating room management, it is not easy to extract useful information from clinical procedure time data. A novel approach was proposed to analyze procedure time during anesthetic induction. A two-step regression analysis was performed to explore influential factors of anesthetic induction time (AIT). Linear regression with stepwise model selection was used to select significant correlates of AIT and then quantile regression was employed to illustrate the dynamic relationships between AIT and selected variables at distinct quantiles. A total of 1,060 patients were analyzed. The first and second-year residents (R1-R2) required longer AIT than the third and fourth-year residents and attending anesthesiologists (p = 0.006). Factors prolonging AIT included American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status ≧ III, arterial, central venous and epidural catheterization, and use of bronchoscopy. Presence of surgeon before induction would decrease AIT (p < 0.001). Types of surgery also had significant influence on AIT. Quantile regression satisfactorily estimated extra time needed to complete induction for each influential factor at distinct quantiles. Our analysis on AIT demonstrated the benefit of quantile regression analysis to provide more comprehensive view of the relationships between procedure time and related factors. This novel two-step regression approach has potential applications to procedure time analysis in operating room management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4524604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45246042015-08-06 A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction Wu, Hsin-Lun Chang, Wen-Kuei Hu, Ken-Hua Langford, Richard M. Tsou, Mei-Yung Chang, Kuang-Yi PLoS One Research Article Although procedure time analyses are important for operating room management, it is not easy to extract useful information from clinical procedure time data. A novel approach was proposed to analyze procedure time during anesthetic induction. A two-step regression analysis was performed to explore influential factors of anesthetic induction time (AIT). Linear regression with stepwise model selection was used to select significant correlates of AIT and then quantile regression was employed to illustrate the dynamic relationships between AIT and selected variables at distinct quantiles. A total of 1,060 patients were analyzed. The first and second-year residents (R1-R2) required longer AIT than the third and fourth-year residents and attending anesthesiologists (p = 0.006). Factors prolonging AIT included American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status ≧ III, arterial, central venous and epidural catheterization, and use of bronchoscopy. Presence of surgeon before induction would decrease AIT (p < 0.001). Types of surgery also had significant influence on AIT. Quantile regression satisfactorily estimated extra time needed to complete induction for each influential factor at distinct quantiles. Our analysis on AIT demonstrated the benefit of quantile regression analysis to provide more comprehensive view of the relationships between procedure time and related factors. This novel two-step regression approach has potential applications to procedure time analysis in operating room management. Public Library of Science 2015-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4524604/ /pubmed/26241647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134838 Text en © 2015 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Hsin-Lun
Chang, Wen-Kuei
Hu, Ken-Hua
Langford, Richard M.
Tsou, Mei-Yung
Chang, Kuang-Yi
A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction
title A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction
title_full A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction
title_fullStr A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction
title_full_unstemmed A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction
title_short A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction
title_sort quantile regression approach to estimating the distribution of anesthetic procedure time during induction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134838
work_keys_str_mv AT wuhsinlun aquantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT changwenkuei aquantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT hukenhua aquantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT langfordrichardm aquantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT tsoumeiyung aquantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT changkuangyi aquantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT wuhsinlun quantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT changwenkuei quantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT hukenhua quantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT langfordrichardm quantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT tsoumeiyung quantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction
AT changkuangyi quantileregressionapproachtoestimatingthedistributionofanestheticproceduretimeduringinduction