Cargando…
Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study
OBJECTIVE: To compare the positions of the mandibular premolars in Angle Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. The results will provide a theoretical basis for predicting effective tooth movement in orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Cephalometric parameters were determined using cone-bea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association of Orthodontists
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.180 |
_version_ | 1782384260924047360 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Jun Deng, Feng Li, Wan-Shan Li, Xue-Lei Zheng, Lei-Lei Li, Gui-Yuan Bai, Yan-Jie |
author_facet | Duan, Jun Deng, Feng Li, Wan-Shan Li, Xue-Lei Zheng, Lei-Lei Li, Gui-Yuan Bai, Yan-Jie |
author_sort | Duan, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the positions of the mandibular premolars in Angle Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. The results will provide a theoretical basis for predicting effective tooth movement in orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Cephalometric parameters were determined using cone-beam computed tomography in 120 Angle Class I subjects. Subjects were categorized as short, normal, and long face types according to the Frankfort mandibular angle. Parameters indicating the position of the mandibular right premolars and the mandible were also measured. RESULTS: The angle between the mandibular first premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance between the root apex and buccal cortex, angle of vestibularization, arc of vestibularization, and root apex maximum movable distance were significantly greater in the short face type than in the long and norm face types. The angle between the mandibular second premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance from root apex to buccal cortex, and the arc of vestibularization were significantly greater in the short face type than in the normal face type. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4524957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Korean Association of Orthodontists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45249572015-08-07 Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study Duan, Jun Deng, Feng Li, Wan-Shan Li, Xue-Lei Zheng, Lei-Lei Li, Gui-Yuan Bai, Yan-Jie Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the positions of the mandibular premolars in Angle Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. The results will provide a theoretical basis for predicting effective tooth movement in orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Cephalometric parameters were determined using cone-beam computed tomography in 120 Angle Class I subjects. Subjects were categorized as short, normal, and long face types according to the Frankfort mandibular angle. Parameters indicating the position of the mandibular right premolars and the mandible were also measured. RESULTS: The angle between the mandibular first premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance between the root apex and buccal cortex, angle of vestibularization, arc of vestibularization, and root apex maximum movable distance were significantly greater in the short face type than in the long and norm face types. The angle between the mandibular second premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance from root apex to buccal cortex, and the arc of vestibularization were significantly greater in the short face type than in the normal face type. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2015-07 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4524957/ /pubmed/26258064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.180 Text en © 2015 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Duan, Jun Deng, Feng Li, Wan-Shan Li, Xue-Lei Zheng, Lei-Lei Li, Gui-Yuan Bai, Yan-Jie Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title | Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full | Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_fullStr | Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_short | Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_sort | differences in the mandibular premolar positions in angle class i subjects with different vertical facial types: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanjun differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT dengfeng differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT liwanshan differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT lixuelei differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT zhengleilei differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT liguiyuan differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT baiyanjie differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy |