Cargando…

Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the positions of the mandibular premolars in Angle Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. The results will provide a theoretical basis for predicting effective tooth movement in orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Cephalometric parameters were determined using cone-bea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Jun, Deng, Feng, Li, Wan-Shan, Li, Xue-Lei, Zheng, Lei-Lei, Li, Gui-Yuan, Bai, Yan-Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258064
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.180
_version_ 1782384260924047360
author Duan, Jun
Deng, Feng
Li, Wan-Shan
Li, Xue-Lei
Zheng, Lei-Lei
Li, Gui-Yuan
Bai, Yan-Jie
author_facet Duan, Jun
Deng, Feng
Li, Wan-Shan
Li, Xue-Lei
Zheng, Lei-Lei
Li, Gui-Yuan
Bai, Yan-Jie
author_sort Duan, Jun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the positions of the mandibular premolars in Angle Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. The results will provide a theoretical basis for predicting effective tooth movement in orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Cephalometric parameters were determined using cone-beam computed tomography in 120 Angle Class I subjects. Subjects were categorized as short, normal, and long face types according to the Frankfort mandibular angle. Parameters indicating the position of the mandibular right premolars and the mandible were also measured. RESULTS: The angle between the mandibular first premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance between the root apex and buccal cortex, angle of vestibularization, arc of vestibularization, and root apex maximum movable distance were significantly greater in the short face type than in the long and norm face types. The angle between the mandibular second premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance from root apex to buccal cortex, and the arc of vestibularization were significantly greater in the short face type than in the normal face type. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Class I subjects according to vertical facial type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4524957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45249572015-08-07 Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study Duan, Jun Deng, Feng Li, Wan-Shan Li, Xue-Lei Zheng, Lei-Lei Li, Gui-Yuan Bai, Yan-Jie Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the positions of the mandibular premolars in Angle Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. The results will provide a theoretical basis for predicting effective tooth movement in orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Cephalometric parameters were determined using cone-beam computed tomography in 120 Angle Class I subjects. Subjects were categorized as short, normal, and long face types according to the Frankfort mandibular angle. Parameters indicating the position of the mandibular right premolars and the mandible were also measured. RESULTS: The angle between the mandibular first premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance between the root apex and buccal cortex, angle of vestibularization, arc of vestibularization, and root apex maximum movable distance were significantly greater in the short face type than in the long and norm face types. The angle between the mandibular second premolar axis and buccal cortex, the distance from root apex to buccal cortex, and the arc of vestibularization were significantly greater in the short face type than in the normal face type. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Class I subjects according to vertical facial type. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2015-07 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4524957/ /pubmed/26258064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.180 Text en © 2015 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duan, Jun
Deng, Feng
Li, Wan-Shan
Li, Xue-Lei
Zheng, Lei-Lei
Li, Gui-Yuan
Bai, Yan-Jie
Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_full Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_fullStr Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_short Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_sort differences in the mandibular premolar positions in angle class i subjects with different vertical facial types: a cone-beam computed tomography study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258064
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.180
work_keys_str_mv AT duanjun differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT dengfeng differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT liwanshan differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT lixuelei differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT zhengleilei differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT liguiyuan differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT baiyanjie differencesinthemandibularpremolarpositionsinangleclassisubjectswithdifferentverticalfacialtypesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy