Cargando…

The framing effect and skin conductance responses

Individuals often rely on simple heuristics when they face complex choice situations under uncertainty. Traditionally, it has been proposed that cognitive processes are the main driver to evaluate different choice options and to finally reach a decision. Growing evidence, however, highlights a stron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ring, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00188
_version_ 1782384271498936320
author Ring, Patrick
author_facet Ring, Patrick
author_sort Ring, Patrick
collection PubMed
description Individuals often rely on simple heuristics when they face complex choice situations under uncertainty. Traditionally, it has been proposed that cognitive processes are the main driver to evaluate different choice options and to finally reach a decision. Growing evidence, however, highlights a strong interrelation between judgment and decision-making (JDM) on the one hand, and emotional processes on the other hand. This also seems to apply to judgmental heuristics, i.e., decision processes that are typically considered to be fast and intuitive. In this study, participants are exposed to different probabilities of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. Information about electric shock probabilities is either positively or negatively framed. Integrated skin conductance responses (ISCRs) while waiting for electric shock realization are used as an indicator for participants' emotional arousal. This measure is compared to objective probabilities. I find evidence for a relation between emotional body reactions measured by ISCRs and the framing effect. Under negative frames, participants show significantly higher ISCRs while waiting for an electric shock to be delivered than under positive frames. This result might contribute to a better understanding of the psychological processes underlying JDM. Further studies are necessary to reveal the causality underlying this finding, i.e., whether emotional processes influence JDM or vice versa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4525055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45250552015-08-21 The framing effect and skin conductance responses Ring, Patrick Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Individuals often rely on simple heuristics when they face complex choice situations under uncertainty. Traditionally, it has been proposed that cognitive processes are the main driver to evaluate different choice options and to finally reach a decision. Growing evidence, however, highlights a strong interrelation between judgment and decision-making (JDM) on the one hand, and emotional processes on the other hand. This also seems to apply to judgmental heuristics, i.e., decision processes that are typically considered to be fast and intuitive. In this study, participants are exposed to different probabilities of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. Information about electric shock probabilities is either positively or negatively framed. Integrated skin conductance responses (ISCRs) while waiting for electric shock realization are used as an indicator for participants' emotional arousal. This measure is compared to objective probabilities. I find evidence for a relation between emotional body reactions measured by ISCRs and the framing effect. Under negative frames, participants show significantly higher ISCRs while waiting for an electric shock to be delivered than under positive frames. This result might contribute to a better understanding of the psychological processes underlying JDM. Further studies are necessary to reveal the causality underlying this finding, i.e., whether emotional processes influence JDM or vice versa. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4525055/ /pubmed/26300747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00188 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ring. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ring, Patrick
The framing effect and skin conductance responses
title The framing effect and skin conductance responses
title_full The framing effect and skin conductance responses
title_fullStr The framing effect and skin conductance responses
title_full_unstemmed The framing effect and skin conductance responses
title_short The framing effect and skin conductance responses
title_sort framing effect and skin conductance responses
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00188
work_keys_str_mv AT ringpatrick theframingeffectandskinconductanceresponses
AT ringpatrick framingeffectandskinconductanceresponses