Cargando…
The framing effect and skin conductance responses
Individuals often rely on simple heuristics when they face complex choice situations under uncertainty. Traditionally, it has been proposed that cognitive processes are the main driver to evaluate different choice options and to finally reach a decision. Growing evidence, however, highlights a stron...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00188 |
_version_ | 1782384271498936320 |
---|---|
author | Ring, Patrick |
author_facet | Ring, Patrick |
author_sort | Ring, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individuals often rely on simple heuristics when they face complex choice situations under uncertainty. Traditionally, it has been proposed that cognitive processes are the main driver to evaluate different choice options and to finally reach a decision. Growing evidence, however, highlights a strong interrelation between judgment and decision-making (JDM) on the one hand, and emotional processes on the other hand. This also seems to apply to judgmental heuristics, i.e., decision processes that are typically considered to be fast and intuitive. In this study, participants are exposed to different probabilities of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. Information about electric shock probabilities is either positively or negatively framed. Integrated skin conductance responses (ISCRs) while waiting for electric shock realization are used as an indicator for participants' emotional arousal. This measure is compared to objective probabilities. I find evidence for a relation between emotional body reactions measured by ISCRs and the framing effect. Under negative frames, participants show significantly higher ISCRs while waiting for an electric shock to be delivered than under positive frames. This result might contribute to a better understanding of the psychological processes underlying JDM. Further studies are necessary to reveal the causality underlying this finding, i.e., whether emotional processes influence JDM or vice versa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4525055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45250552015-08-21 The framing effect and skin conductance responses Ring, Patrick Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Individuals often rely on simple heuristics when they face complex choice situations under uncertainty. Traditionally, it has been proposed that cognitive processes are the main driver to evaluate different choice options and to finally reach a decision. Growing evidence, however, highlights a strong interrelation between judgment and decision-making (JDM) on the one hand, and emotional processes on the other hand. This also seems to apply to judgmental heuristics, i.e., decision processes that are typically considered to be fast and intuitive. In this study, participants are exposed to different probabilities of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. Information about electric shock probabilities is either positively or negatively framed. Integrated skin conductance responses (ISCRs) while waiting for electric shock realization are used as an indicator for participants' emotional arousal. This measure is compared to objective probabilities. I find evidence for a relation between emotional body reactions measured by ISCRs and the framing effect. Under negative frames, participants show significantly higher ISCRs while waiting for an electric shock to be delivered than under positive frames. This result might contribute to a better understanding of the psychological processes underlying JDM. Further studies are necessary to reveal the causality underlying this finding, i.e., whether emotional processes influence JDM or vice versa. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4525055/ /pubmed/26300747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00188 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ring. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ring, Patrick The framing effect and skin conductance responses |
title | The framing effect and skin conductance responses |
title_full | The framing effect and skin conductance responses |
title_fullStr | The framing effect and skin conductance responses |
title_full_unstemmed | The framing effect and skin conductance responses |
title_short | The framing effect and skin conductance responses |
title_sort | framing effect and skin conductance responses |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ringpatrick theframingeffectandskinconductanceresponses AT ringpatrick framingeffectandskinconductanceresponses |