Cargando…
On the challenges of drawing conclusions from p-values just below 0.05
In recent years, researchers have attempted to provide an indication of the prevalence of inflated Type 1 error rates by analyzing the distribution of p-values in the published literature. De Winter & Dodou (2015) analyzed the distribution (and its change over time) of a large number of p-values...
Autor principal: | Lakens, Daniël |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246976 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1142 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are Only p-Values Less Than 0.05 Significant? A p-Value Greater Than 0.05 Is Also Significant!
por: Kwak, Sanggyu
Publicado: (2023) -
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: “P” values, statistical significance and confidence intervals
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporine Nanoemulsion 0.05% Compared with Topical Cyclosporine Emulsion 0.05% and Diquafosol 3% in Dry Eye
por: Park, Chang Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Origin of colossal dielectric permittivity of rutile Ti(0.9)In(0.05)Nb(0.05)O(2): single crystal and polycrystalline
por: Song, Yongli, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Efficacy of 0.05% Chlorhexidine and 0.05% Cetylpyridinium Chloride Mouthwash to Eliminate Living Bacteria on In Situ Collected Biofilms: An In Vitro Study
por: Becker, Kathrin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)