Cargando…

A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample

BACKGROUND: Tailored feedback has been shown to be effective for modifying health risk behaviours and may aid the provision of preventive care by general practitioners (GPs). However, provision of tailored patient feedback for vulnerable or socially disadvantaged groups is not well explored. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noble, Natasha, Paul, Christine, Carey, Mariko, Blunden, Stephen, Turner, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26243144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7
_version_ 1782384350400086016
author Noble, Natasha
Paul, Christine
Carey, Mariko
Blunden, Stephen
Turner, Nicole
author_facet Noble, Natasha
Paul, Christine
Carey, Mariko
Blunden, Stephen
Turner, Nicole
author_sort Noble, Natasha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tailored feedback has been shown to be effective for modifying health risk behaviours and may aid the provision of preventive care by general practitioners (GPs). However, provision of tailored patient feedback for vulnerable or socially disadvantaged groups is not well explored. The aims of this study were to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic compared to tailored feedback on self-reported health risk behaviours among a high need sample of people attending an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service (ACCHS). METHODS: Participants attending two ACCHSs in regional New South Wales completed a touch screen health risk survey and received either generic or tailored health risk feedback. Participants were asked to complete an exit survey after their appointment. The exit survey asked about feedback acceptability and effectiveness. Self-reported ease of understanding, relevance and whether the generic versus tailored feedback helped patients talk to their GP was compared using Chi-square analysis; The mean number of survey health risks talked about or for which additional actions were undertaken (such as provision of lifestyle advice or referral) was compared using t-tests. RESULTS: Eighty seven participants (36 % consent rate) completed the exit survey. Tailored feedback was rated as more relevant and was more likely to be shown to the participant’s GP than generic feedback. There was no difference in the mean number of health risk topics discussed or number of additional actions taken by the GP by type of feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored and generic feedback showed no difference in effectiveness, and little difference in acceptability, among this socially disadvantaged population. Completing a health risk survey and receiving any type of feedback may have overwhelmed more subtle differences in outcomes between the generic and the tailored feedback. Future work to rigorously evaluate the longer-term effectiveness of the provision of tailored health risk feedback for Aboriginal Australians, as well as other high need groups, is still needed. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZCTRN12614001205628. Registered 11 November 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4525725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45257252015-08-06 A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample Noble, Natasha Paul, Christine Carey, Mariko Blunden, Stephen Turner, Nicole BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Tailored feedback has been shown to be effective for modifying health risk behaviours and may aid the provision of preventive care by general practitioners (GPs). However, provision of tailored patient feedback for vulnerable or socially disadvantaged groups is not well explored. The aims of this study were to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic compared to tailored feedback on self-reported health risk behaviours among a high need sample of people attending an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service (ACCHS). METHODS: Participants attending two ACCHSs in regional New South Wales completed a touch screen health risk survey and received either generic or tailored health risk feedback. Participants were asked to complete an exit survey after their appointment. The exit survey asked about feedback acceptability and effectiveness. Self-reported ease of understanding, relevance and whether the generic versus tailored feedback helped patients talk to their GP was compared using Chi-square analysis; The mean number of survey health risks talked about or for which additional actions were undertaken (such as provision of lifestyle advice or referral) was compared using t-tests. RESULTS: Eighty seven participants (36 % consent rate) completed the exit survey. Tailored feedback was rated as more relevant and was more likely to be shown to the participant’s GP than generic feedback. There was no difference in the mean number of health risk topics discussed or number of additional actions taken by the GP by type of feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored and generic feedback showed no difference in effectiveness, and little difference in acceptability, among this socially disadvantaged population. Completing a health risk survey and receiving any type of feedback may have overwhelmed more subtle differences in outcomes between the generic and the tailored feedback. Future work to rigorously evaluate the longer-term effectiveness of the provision of tailored health risk feedback for Aboriginal Australians, as well as other high need groups, is still needed. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZCTRN12614001205628. Registered 11 November 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4525725/ /pubmed/26243144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7 Text en © Noble et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Noble, Natasha
Paul, Christine
Carey, Mariko
Blunden, Stephen
Turner, Nicole
A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
title A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
title_full A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
title_fullStr A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
title_full_unstemmed A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
title_short A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
title_sort randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26243144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7
work_keys_str_mv AT noblenatasha arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT paulchristine arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT careymariko arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT blundenstephen arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT turnernicole arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT noblenatasha randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT paulchristine randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT careymariko randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT blundenstephen randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample
AT turnernicole randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample