Cargando…
A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample
BACKGROUND: Tailored feedback has been shown to be effective for modifying health risk behaviours and may aid the provision of preventive care by general practitioners (GPs). However, provision of tailored patient feedback for vulnerable or socially disadvantaged groups is not well explored. The aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26243144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7 |
_version_ | 1782384350400086016 |
---|---|
author | Noble, Natasha Paul, Christine Carey, Mariko Blunden, Stephen Turner, Nicole |
author_facet | Noble, Natasha Paul, Christine Carey, Mariko Blunden, Stephen Turner, Nicole |
author_sort | Noble, Natasha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tailored feedback has been shown to be effective for modifying health risk behaviours and may aid the provision of preventive care by general practitioners (GPs). However, provision of tailored patient feedback for vulnerable or socially disadvantaged groups is not well explored. The aims of this study were to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic compared to tailored feedback on self-reported health risk behaviours among a high need sample of people attending an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service (ACCHS). METHODS: Participants attending two ACCHSs in regional New South Wales completed a touch screen health risk survey and received either generic or tailored health risk feedback. Participants were asked to complete an exit survey after their appointment. The exit survey asked about feedback acceptability and effectiveness. Self-reported ease of understanding, relevance and whether the generic versus tailored feedback helped patients talk to their GP was compared using Chi-square analysis; The mean number of survey health risks talked about or for which additional actions were undertaken (such as provision of lifestyle advice or referral) was compared using t-tests. RESULTS: Eighty seven participants (36 % consent rate) completed the exit survey. Tailored feedback was rated as more relevant and was more likely to be shown to the participant’s GP than generic feedback. There was no difference in the mean number of health risk topics discussed or number of additional actions taken by the GP by type of feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored and generic feedback showed no difference in effectiveness, and little difference in acceptability, among this socially disadvantaged population. Completing a health risk survey and receiving any type of feedback may have overwhelmed more subtle differences in outcomes between the generic and the tailored feedback. Future work to rigorously evaluate the longer-term effectiveness of the provision of tailored health risk feedback for Aboriginal Australians, as well as other high need groups, is still needed. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZCTRN12614001205628. Registered 11 November 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4525725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45257252015-08-06 A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample Noble, Natasha Paul, Christine Carey, Mariko Blunden, Stephen Turner, Nicole BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Tailored feedback has been shown to be effective for modifying health risk behaviours and may aid the provision of preventive care by general practitioners (GPs). However, provision of tailored patient feedback for vulnerable or socially disadvantaged groups is not well explored. The aims of this study were to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic compared to tailored feedback on self-reported health risk behaviours among a high need sample of people attending an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service (ACCHS). METHODS: Participants attending two ACCHSs in regional New South Wales completed a touch screen health risk survey and received either generic or tailored health risk feedback. Participants were asked to complete an exit survey after their appointment. The exit survey asked about feedback acceptability and effectiveness. Self-reported ease of understanding, relevance and whether the generic versus tailored feedback helped patients talk to their GP was compared using Chi-square analysis; The mean number of survey health risks talked about or for which additional actions were undertaken (such as provision of lifestyle advice or referral) was compared using t-tests. RESULTS: Eighty seven participants (36 % consent rate) completed the exit survey. Tailored feedback was rated as more relevant and was more likely to be shown to the participant’s GP than generic feedback. There was no difference in the mean number of health risk topics discussed or number of additional actions taken by the GP by type of feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored and generic feedback showed no difference in effectiveness, and little difference in acceptability, among this socially disadvantaged population. Completing a health risk survey and receiving any type of feedback may have overwhelmed more subtle differences in outcomes between the generic and the tailored feedback. Future work to rigorously evaluate the longer-term effectiveness of the provision of tailored health risk feedback for Aboriginal Australians, as well as other high need groups, is still needed. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZCTRN12614001205628. Registered 11 November 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4525725/ /pubmed/26243144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7 Text en © Noble et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Noble, Natasha Paul, Christine Carey, Mariko Blunden, Stephen Turner, Nicole A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample |
title | A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample |
title_full | A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample |
title_fullStr | A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample |
title_short | A randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample |
title_sort | randomised trial assessing the acceptability and effectiveness of providing generic versus tailored feedback about health risks for a high need primary care sample |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26243144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0309-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noblenatasha arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT paulchristine arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT careymariko arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT blundenstephen arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT turnernicole arandomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT noblenatasha randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT paulchristine randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT careymariko randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT blundenstephen randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample AT turnernicole randomisedtrialassessingtheacceptabilityandeffectivenessofprovidinggenericversustailoredfeedbackabouthealthrisksforahighneedprimarycaresample |