Cargando…

Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents

Invasive plants have tremendous potential to enrich native food webs by subsidizing net primary productivity. Here, we explored how a potential food subsidy, seeds produced by the aggressive invader cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), is utilized by an important guild of native consumers – granivorous sma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucero, Jacob E., Allen, Phil S., McMillan, Brock R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131564
_version_ 1782384427905581056
author Lucero, Jacob E.
Allen, Phil S.
McMillan, Brock R.
author_facet Lucero, Jacob E.
Allen, Phil S.
McMillan, Brock R.
author_sort Lucero, Jacob E.
collection PubMed
description Invasive plants have tremendous potential to enrich native food webs by subsidizing net primary productivity. Here, we explored how a potential food subsidy, seeds produced by the aggressive invader cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), is utilized by an important guild of native consumers – granivorous small mammals – in the Great Basin Desert, USA. In a series of field experiments we examined 1) how cheatgrass invasion affects the density and biomass of seed rain at the ecosystem-level; 2) how seed resources from cheatgrass numerically affect granivorous small mammals; and 3) how the food preferences of native granivores might mediate the trophic integration of cheatgrass seeds. Relative to native productivity, cheatgrass invasion increased the density and biomass of seed rain by over 2000% (P < 0.01) and 3500% (P < 0.01), respectively. However, granivorous small mammals in native communities showed no positive response in abundance, richness, or diversity to experimental additions of cheatgrass seeds over one year. This lack of response correlated with a distinct preference for seeds from native grasses over seeds from cheatgrass. Our experiments demonstrate that increased primary productivity associated with exotic plant invasions may not necessarily subsidize consumers at higher trophic levels. In this context, cheatgrass invasion could disrupt native food webs by providing less-preferred resources that fail to enrich higher trophic levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4526561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45265612015-08-12 Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents Lucero, Jacob E. Allen, Phil S. McMillan, Brock R. PLoS One Research Article Invasive plants have tremendous potential to enrich native food webs by subsidizing net primary productivity. Here, we explored how a potential food subsidy, seeds produced by the aggressive invader cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), is utilized by an important guild of native consumers – granivorous small mammals – in the Great Basin Desert, USA. In a series of field experiments we examined 1) how cheatgrass invasion affects the density and biomass of seed rain at the ecosystem-level; 2) how seed resources from cheatgrass numerically affect granivorous small mammals; and 3) how the food preferences of native granivores might mediate the trophic integration of cheatgrass seeds. Relative to native productivity, cheatgrass invasion increased the density and biomass of seed rain by over 2000% (P < 0.01) and 3500% (P < 0.01), respectively. However, granivorous small mammals in native communities showed no positive response in abundance, richness, or diversity to experimental additions of cheatgrass seeds over one year. This lack of response correlated with a distinct preference for seeds from native grasses over seeds from cheatgrass. Our experiments demonstrate that increased primary productivity associated with exotic plant invasions may not necessarily subsidize consumers at higher trophic levels. In this context, cheatgrass invasion could disrupt native food webs by providing less-preferred resources that fail to enrich higher trophic levels. Public Library of Science 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4526561/ /pubmed/26244345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131564 Text en © 2015 Lucero et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lucero, Jacob E.
Allen, Phil S.
McMillan, Brock R.
Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents
title Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents
title_full Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents
title_fullStr Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents
title_full_unstemmed Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents
title_short Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents
title_sort increased primary production from an exotic invader does not subsidize native rodents
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131564
work_keys_str_mv AT lucerojacobe increasedprimaryproductionfromanexoticinvaderdoesnotsubsidizenativerodents
AT allenphils increasedprimaryproductionfromanexoticinvaderdoesnotsubsidizenativerodents
AT mcmillanbrockr increasedprimaryproductionfromanexoticinvaderdoesnotsubsidizenativerodents