Cargando…

Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: To study early neurodevelopment in preterm infants, evaluation of brain maturation and injury is increasingly performed using diffusion tensor imaging, for which the reliability of underlying data is paramount. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to evaluate acquisition and processing me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieterman, Kay, Plaisier, Annemarie, Govaert, Paul, Leemans, Alexander, Lequin, Maarten H., Dudink, Jeroen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25820411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y
_version_ 1782384434213814272
author Pieterman, Kay
Plaisier, Annemarie
Govaert, Paul
Leemans, Alexander
Lequin, Maarten H.
Dudink, Jeroen
author_facet Pieterman, Kay
Plaisier, Annemarie
Govaert, Paul
Leemans, Alexander
Lequin, Maarten H.
Dudink, Jeroen
author_sort Pieterman, Kay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To study early neurodevelopment in preterm infants, evaluation of brain maturation and injury is increasingly performed using diffusion tensor imaging, for which the reliability of underlying data is paramount. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to evaluate acquisition and processing methodology in diffusion tensor imaging studies of preterm infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for relevant papers published between 2003 and 2013. The following keywords were included in our search: prematurity, neuroimaging, brain, and diffusion tensor imaging. RESULTS: We found 74 diffusion tensor imaging studies in preterm infants meeting our inclusion criteria. There was wide variation in acquisition and processing methodology, and we found incomplete reporting of these settings. Nineteen studies (26%) reported the use of neonatal hardware. Data quality assessment was not reported in 13 (18%) studies. Artefacts-correction and data-exclusion was not reported in 33 (45%) and 18 (24%) studies, respectively. Tensor estimation algorithms were reported in 56 (76%) studies but were often suboptimal. CONCLUSION: Diffusion tensor imaging acquisition and processing settings are incompletely described in current literature, vary considerably, and frequently do not meet the highest standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4526590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45265902015-08-06 Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review Pieterman, Kay Plaisier, Annemarie Govaert, Paul Leemans, Alexander Lequin, Maarten H. Dudink, Jeroen Pediatr Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: To study early neurodevelopment in preterm infants, evaluation of brain maturation and injury is increasingly performed using diffusion tensor imaging, for which the reliability of underlying data is paramount. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to evaluate acquisition and processing methodology in diffusion tensor imaging studies of preterm infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for relevant papers published between 2003 and 2013. The following keywords were included in our search: prematurity, neuroimaging, brain, and diffusion tensor imaging. RESULTS: We found 74 diffusion tensor imaging studies in preterm infants meeting our inclusion criteria. There was wide variation in acquisition and processing methodology, and we found incomplete reporting of these settings. Nineteen studies (26%) reported the use of neonatal hardware. Data quality assessment was not reported in 13 (18%) studies. Artefacts-correction and data-exclusion was not reported in 33 (45%) and 18 (24%) studies, respectively. Tensor estimation algorithms were reported in 56 (76%) studies but were often suboptimal. CONCLUSION: Diffusion tensor imaging acquisition and processing settings are incompletely described in current literature, vary considerably, and frequently do not meet the highest standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-03-29 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4526590/ /pubmed/25820411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pieterman, Kay
Plaisier, Annemarie
Govaert, Paul
Leemans, Alexander
Lequin, Maarten H.
Dudink, Jeroen
Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
title Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
title_full Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
title_fullStr Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
title_short Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
title_sort data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25820411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pietermankay dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview
AT plaisierannemarie dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview
AT govaertpaul dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview
AT leemansalexander dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview
AT lequinmaartenh dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview
AT dudinkjeroen dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview