Cargando…
Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: To study early neurodevelopment in preterm infants, evaluation of brain maturation and injury is increasingly performed using diffusion tensor imaging, for which the reliability of underlying data is paramount. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to evaluate acquisition and processing me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25820411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y |
_version_ | 1782384434213814272 |
---|---|
author | Pieterman, Kay Plaisier, Annemarie Govaert, Paul Leemans, Alexander Lequin, Maarten H. Dudink, Jeroen |
author_facet | Pieterman, Kay Plaisier, Annemarie Govaert, Paul Leemans, Alexander Lequin, Maarten H. Dudink, Jeroen |
author_sort | Pieterman, Kay |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To study early neurodevelopment in preterm infants, evaluation of brain maturation and injury is increasingly performed using diffusion tensor imaging, for which the reliability of underlying data is paramount. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to evaluate acquisition and processing methodology in diffusion tensor imaging studies of preterm infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for relevant papers published between 2003 and 2013. The following keywords were included in our search: prematurity, neuroimaging, brain, and diffusion tensor imaging. RESULTS: We found 74 diffusion tensor imaging studies in preterm infants meeting our inclusion criteria. There was wide variation in acquisition and processing methodology, and we found incomplete reporting of these settings. Nineteen studies (26%) reported the use of neonatal hardware. Data quality assessment was not reported in 13 (18%) studies. Artefacts-correction and data-exclusion was not reported in 33 (45%) and 18 (24%) studies, respectively. Tensor estimation algorithms were reported in 56 (76%) studies but were often suboptimal. CONCLUSION: Diffusion tensor imaging acquisition and processing settings are incompletely described in current literature, vary considerably, and frequently do not meet the highest standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4526590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45265902015-08-06 Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review Pieterman, Kay Plaisier, Annemarie Govaert, Paul Leemans, Alexander Lequin, Maarten H. Dudink, Jeroen Pediatr Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: To study early neurodevelopment in preterm infants, evaluation of brain maturation and injury is increasingly performed using diffusion tensor imaging, for which the reliability of underlying data is paramount. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to evaluate acquisition and processing methodology in diffusion tensor imaging studies of preterm infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for relevant papers published between 2003 and 2013. The following keywords were included in our search: prematurity, neuroimaging, brain, and diffusion tensor imaging. RESULTS: We found 74 diffusion tensor imaging studies in preterm infants meeting our inclusion criteria. There was wide variation in acquisition and processing methodology, and we found incomplete reporting of these settings. Nineteen studies (26%) reported the use of neonatal hardware. Data quality assessment was not reported in 13 (18%) studies. Artefacts-correction and data-exclusion was not reported in 33 (45%) and 18 (24%) studies, respectively. Tensor estimation algorithms were reported in 56 (76%) studies but were often suboptimal. CONCLUSION: Diffusion tensor imaging acquisition and processing settings are incompletely described in current literature, vary considerably, and frequently do not meet the highest standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-03-29 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4526590/ /pubmed/25820411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pieterman, Kay Plaisier, Annemarie Govaert, Paul Leemans, Alexander Lequin, Maarten H. Dudink, Jeroen Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review |
title | Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review |
title_full | Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review |
title_short | Data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review |
title_sort | data quality in diffusion tensor imaging studies of the preterm brain: a systematic review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25820411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3307-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pietermankay dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview AT plaisierannemarie dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview AT govaertpaul dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview AT leemansalexander dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview AT lequinmaartenh dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview AT dudinkjeroen dataqualityindiffusiontensorimagingstudiesofthepretermbrainasystematicreview |