Cargando…
Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: There are limited data comparing dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors directly. We compared the safety and efficacy of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment (RI). METHODS: This study was a parallel-arm, randomised, multicentre...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3655-z |
_version_ | 1782384434658410496 |
---|---|
author | Kothny, Wolfgang Lukashevich, Valentina Foley, James E. Rendell, Marc S. Schweizer, Anja |
author_facet | Kothny, Wolfgang Lukashevich, Valentina Foley, James E. Rendell, Marc S. Schweizer, Anja |
author_sort | Kothny, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: There are limited data comparing dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors directly. We compared the safety and efficacy of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment (RI). METHODS: This study was a parallel-arm, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, 24 week study conducted in 87 centres across Brazil and the USA. Patients with type 2 diabetes, either drug naive or treated with any glucose-lowering agents, who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA(1c) 6.5–10.0% [48–86 mmol/mol]) and an estimated GFR <30 ml min(−1) [1.73 m](−2) were randomised (via interactive voice response technology) to vildagliptin 50 mg once daily or sitagliptin 25 mg once daily. These doses are recommended in this patient population and considered maximally effective. Participants, investigators and the sponsor were blinded to group assignment. Efficacy endpoints included change in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at all visits and the primary safety endpoint was assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were randomised, 83 to vildagliptin and 65 to sitagliptin. All patients were analysed. After 24 weeks, the adjusted mean change in HbA(1c) was −0.54% (5.9 mmol/mol) from a baseline of 7.52% (59 mmol/mol) with vildagliptin and −0.56% (6.1 mmol/mol) from a baseline of 7.80% (62 mmol/mol) with sitagliptin (p = 0.874). FPG decreased by 0.47 ± 0.37 mmol/l with vildagliptin and increased by 0.16 ± 0.43 mmol/l with sitagliptin (p = 0.185). Both treatments were well tolerated with overall similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: At their recommended doses for severe RI, vildagliptin (50 mg once daily) compared with sitagliptin (25 mg once daily) demonstrated similar efficacy and both drugs were well tolerated. This study provides further support for the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with severe RI. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00616811 (completed) Funding: This study was planned and conducted by Novartis ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3655-z) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4526592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45265922015-08-06 Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial Kothny, Wolfgang Lukashevich, Valentina Foley, James E. Rendell, Marc S. Schweizer, Anja Diabetologia Article AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: There are limited data comparing dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors directly. We compared the safety and efficacy of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment (RI). METHODS: This study was a parallel-arm, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, 24 week study conducted in 87 centres across Brazil and the USA. Patients with type 2 diabetes, either drug naive or treated with any glucose-lowering agents, who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA(1c) 6.5–10.0% [48–86 mmol/mol]) and an estimated GFR <30 ml min(−1) [1.73 m](−2) were randomised (via interactive voice response technology) to vildagliptin 50 mg once daily or sitagliptin 25 mg once daily. These doses are recommended in this patient population and considered maximally effective. Participants, investigators and the sponsor were blinded to group assignment. Efficacy endpoints included change in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at all visits and the primary safety endpoint was assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were randomised, 83 to vildagliptin and 65 to sitagliptin. All patients were analysed. After 24 weeks, the adjusted mean change in HbA(1c) was −0.54% (5.9 mmol/mol) from a baseline of 7.52% (59 mmol/mol) with vildagliptin and −0.56% (6.1 mmol/mol) from a baseline of 7.80% (62 mmol/mol) with sitagliptin (p = 0.874). FPG decreased by 0.47 ± 0.37 mmol/l with vildagliptin and increased by 0.16 ± 0.43 mmol/l with sitagliptin (p = 0.185). Both treatments were well tolerated with overall similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: At their recommended doses for severe RI, vildagliptin (50 mg once daily) compared with sitagliptin (25 mg once daily) demonstrated similar efficacy and both drugs were well tolerated. This study provides further support for the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with severe RI. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00616811 (completed) Funding: This study was planned and conducted by Novartis ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3655-z) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-06-12 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4526592/ /pubmed/26067186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3655-z Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Kothny, Wolfgang Lukashevich, Valentina Foley, James E. Rendell, Marc S. Schweizer, Anja Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial |
title | Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a randomised clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3655-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kothnywolfgang comparisonofvildagliptinandsitagliptininpatientswithtype2diabetesandsevererenalimpairmentarandomisedclinicaltrial AT lukashevichvalentina comparisonofvildagliptinandsitagliptininpatientswithtype2diabetesandsevererenalimpairmentarandomisedclinicaltrial AT foleyjamese comparisonofvildagliptinandsitagliptininpatientswithtype2diabetesandsevererenalimpairmentarandomisedclinicaltrial AT rendellmarcs comparisonofvildagliptinandsitagliptininpatientswithtype2diabetesandsevererenalimpairmentarandomisedclinicaltrial AT schweizeranja comparisonofvildagliptinandsitagliptininpatientswithtype2diabetesandsevererenalimpairmentarandomisedclinicaltrial |