Cargando…

Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist

INTRODUCTION: To prospectively evaluate if the inclusion of a clinical sexologist in a penile and sexual rehabilitation program improves sexual function one year after prostate cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve months after da Vinci Radical Prostatectomy (dVRP) for prostate cancer, 28 ful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ljunggren, Christina, Ströberg, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251748
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.484
_version_ 1782384436922286080
author Ljunggren, Christina
Ströberg, Peter
author_facet Ljunggren, Christina
Ströberg, Peter
author_sort Ljunggren, Christina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To prospectively evaluate if the inclusion of a clinical sexologist in a penile and sexual rehabilitation program improves sexual function one year after prostate cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve months after da Vinci Radical Prostatectomy (dVRP) for prostate cancer, 28 fully potent (IIEF-5 >21) and sexually active men (ages 47-69 years, mean 61) who, in 2008, were enrolled in a prospectively monitored penile rehabilitation program (reference group) were compared with 79 fully potent (IIEF-5 >21) and sexually active men (ages 45-74 years, mean 61) enrolled in 2009 (study group); whose program differed by the inclusion of evaluation and treatment by a clinical sexologist. RESULTS: Twelve months after dVRP, seventeen patients in the reference group (61%) were sexually active with regular penetrating sexual activity compared to sixty-six (84%) in the study group (p = 0.02). These findings were independent of whether they had undergone a nerve sparing or non-nerve sparing procedure. Almost 94% (74 patients) in the study group had at some time been able to perform penetrating sexual activity; 14 patients required additional visits to the clinical sexologist beyond the routine follow-up, 9 for short-term cognitive behavior therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of a clinical sexologist in a penile and sexual rehabilitation program appears to improve the ability to have regular sexual activity with penetrating sex one year after da Vinci Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4526602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45266022015-08-06 Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist Ljunggren, Christina Ströberg, Peter Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: To prospectively evaluate if the inclusion of a clinical sexologist in a penile and sexual rehabilitation program improves sexual function one year after prostate cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve months after da Vinci Radical Prostatectomy (dVRP) for prostate cancer, 28 fully potent (IIEF-5 >21) and sexually active men (ages 47-69 years, mean 61) who, in 2008, were enrolled in a prospectively monitored penile rehabilitation program (reference group) were compared with 79 fully potent (IIEF-5 >21) and sexually active men (ages 45-74 years, mean 61) enrolled in 2009 (study group); whose program differed by the inclusion of evaluation and treatment by a clinical sexologist. RESULTS: Twelve months after dVRP, seventeen patients in the reference group (61%) were sexually active with regular penetrating sexual activity compared to sixty-six (84%) in the study group (p = 0.02). These findings were independent of whether they had undergone a nerve sparing or non-nerve sparing procedure. Almost 94% (74 patients) in the study group had at some time been able to perform penetrating sexual activity; 14 patients required additional visits to the clinical sexologist beyond the routine follow-up, 9 for short-term cognitive behavior therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of a clinical sexologist in a penile and sexual rehabilitation program appears to improve the ability to have regular sexual activity with penetrating sex one year after da Vinci Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. Polish Urological Association 2015-05-04 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4526602/ /pubmed/26251748 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.484 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ljunggren, Christina
Ströberg, Peter
Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist
title Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist
title_full Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist
title_fullStr Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist
title_full_unstemmed Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist
title_short Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist
title_sort improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251748
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.484
work_keys_str_mv AT ljunggrenchristina improvementinsexualfunctionafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyarehabilitationprogramwithinvolvementofaclinicalsexologist
AT strobergpeter improvementinsexualfunctionafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyarehabilitationprogramwithinvolvementofaclinicalsexologist