Cargando…

A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications

INTRODUCTION: Rates of infectious complications continue to increase following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB). Administration of a parenteral antibiotic at time of procedure represents one potential prophylaxis strategy. The efficacy of this practice remains incomple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raman, Jay D., Rjepaj, Chris, Otteni, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251751
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.531
_version_ 1782384438502490112
author Raman, Jay D.
Rjepaj, Chris
Otteni, Christopher
author_facet Raman, Jay D.
Rjepaj, Chris
Otteni, Christopher
author_sort Raman, Jay D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rates of infectious complications continue to increase following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB). Administration of a parenteral antibiotic at time of procedure represents one potential prophylaxis strategy. The efficacy of this practice remains incompletely defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our institutional TRUS PNB database was reviewed to identify consecutive men undergoing a biopsy over a 48-month period. The peri-operative intravenous antibiotic regimen (when used) included gentamicin 80 mg administered intravenously (IV) 30 minutes prior to biopsy. The incidence of infections post-biopsy was compared between patients receiving oral alone versus IV plus oral antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: 182 of 522 men (34.9%) included in this study received peri-procedural IV gentamicin at time of TRUS PNB, with a significant increase in utilization during the study time period (p <0.001). In total, 39 patients (7.5%) developed an infectious complication post-biopsy. No differences in infection rates were observed between patients receiving only oral prophylaxis (27 of 340, 7.9%) versus those receiving oral with IV gentamicin (12 of 182, 6.6%) (p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this 4-year cohort analysis, a single peri-procedural dose of 80 mg of intravenous gentamicin failed to confer a reduction in infectious complications following prostate needle biopsy. Such data underscore the need to better understand the dose, route, and type of antimicrobial therapy to limit procedural infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4526609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45266092015-08-06 A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications Raman, Jay D. Rjepaj, Chris Otteni, Christopher Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Rates of infectious complications continue to increase following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB). Administration of a parenteral antibiotic at time of procedure represents one potential prophylaxis strategy. The efficacy of this practice remains incompletely defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our institutional TRUS PNB database was reviewed to identify consecutive men undergoing a biopsy over a 48-month period. The peri-operative intravenous antibiotic regimen (when used) included gentamicin 80 mg administered intravenously (IV) 30 minutes prior to biopsy. The incidence of infections post-biopsy was compared between patients receiving oral alone versus IV plus oral antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: 182 of 522 men (34.9%) included in this study received peri-procedural IV gentamicin at time of TRUS PNB, with a significant increase in utilization during the study time period (p <0.001). In total, 39 patients (7.5%) developed an infectious complication post-biopsy. No differences in infection rates were observed between patients receiving only oral prophylaxis (27 of 340, 7.9%) versus those receiving oral with IV gentamicin (12 of 182, 6.6%) (p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this 4-year cohort analysis, a single peri-procedural dose of 80 mg of intravenous gentamicin failed to confer a reduction in infectious complications following prostate needle biopsy. Such data underscore the need to better understand the dose, route, and type of antimicrobial therapy to limit procedural infections. Polish Urological Association 2015-04-30 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4526609/ /pubmed/26251751 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.531 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Raman, Jay D.
Rjepaj, Chris
Otteni, Christopher
A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
title A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
title_full A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
title_fullStr A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
title_full_unstemmed A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
title_short A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
title_sort single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251751
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.531
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanjayd asingle80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications
AT rjepajchris asingle80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications
AT ottenichristopher asingle80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications
AT ramanjayd single80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications
AT rjepajchris single80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications
AT ottenichristopher single80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications