Cargando…
A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications
INTRODUCTION: Rates of infectious complications continue to increase following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB). Administration of a parenteral antibiotic at time of procedure represents one potential prophylaxis strategy. The efficacy of this practice remains incomple...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251751 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.531 |
_version_ | 1782384438502490112 |
---|---|
author | Raman, Jay D. Rjepaj, Chris Otteni, Christopher |
author_facet | Raman, Jay D. Rjepaj, Chris Otteni, Christopher |
author_sort | Raman, Jay D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Rates of infectious complications continue to increase following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB). Administration of a parenteral antibiotic at time of procedure represents one potential prophylaxis strategy. The efficacy of this practice remains incompletely defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our institutional TRUS PNB database was reviewed to identify consecutive men undergoing a biopsy over a 48-month period. The peri-operative intravenous antibiotic regimen (when used) included gentamicin 80 mg administered intravenously (IV) 30 minutes prior to biopsy. The incidence of infections post-biopsy was compared between patients receiving oral alone versus IV plus oral antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: 182 of 522 men (34.9%) included in this study received peri-procedural IV gentamicin at time of TRUS PNB, with a significant increase in utilization during the study time period (p <0.001). In total, 39 patients (7.5%) developed an infectious complication post-biopsy. No differences in infection rates were observed between patients receiving only oral prophylaxis (27 of 340, 7.9%) versus those receiving oral with IV gentamicin (12 of 182, 6.6%) (p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this 4-year cohort analysis, a single peri-procedural dose of 80 mg of intravenous gentamicin failed to confer a reduction in infectious complications following prostate needle biopsy. Such data underscore the need to better understand the dose, route, and type of antimicrobial therapy to limit procedural infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4526609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45266092015-08-06 A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications Raman, Jay D. Rjepaj, Chris Otteni, Christopher Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Rates of infectious complications continue to increase following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB). Administration of a parenteral antibiotic at time of procedure represents one potential prophylaxis strategy. The efficacy of this practice remains incompletely defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our institutional TRUS PNB database was reviewed to identify consecutive men undergoing a biopsy over a 48-month period. The peri-operative intravenous antibiotic regimen (when used) included gentamicin 80 mg administered intravenously (IV) 30 minutes prior to biopsy. The incidence of infections post-biopsy was compared between patients receiving oral alone versus IV plus oral antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: 182 of 522 men (34.9%) included in this study received peri-procedural IV gentamicin at time of TRUS PNB, with a significant increase in utilization during the study time period (p <0.001). In total, 39 patients (7.5%) developed an infectious complication post-biopsy. No differences in infection rates were observed between patients receiving only oral prophylaxis (27 of 340, 7.9%) versus those receiving oral with IV gentamicin (12 of 182, 6.6%) (p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this 4-year cohort analysis, a single peri-procedural dose of 80 mg of intravenous gentamicin failed to confer a reduction in infectious complications following prostate needle biopsy. Such data underscore the need to better understand the dose, route, and type of antimicrobial therapy to limit procedural infections. Polish Urological Association 2015-04-30 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4526609/ /pubmed/26251751 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.531 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Raman, Jay D. Rjepaj, Chris Otteni, Christopher A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications |
title | A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications |
title_full | A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications |
title_fullStr | A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications |
title_full_unstemmed | A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications |
title_short | A single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications |
title_sort | single 80 mg intravenous gentamicin dose prior to prostate needle biopsy does not reduce procedural infectious complications |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26251751 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramanjayd asingle80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications AT rjepajchris asingle80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications AT ottenichristopher asingle80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications AT ramanjayd single80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications AT rjepajchris single80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications AT ottenichristopher single80mgintravenousgentamicindosepriortoprostateneedlebiopsydoesnotreduceproceduralinfectiouscomplications |