Cargando…
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly morbid condition in critically ill patients that is associated with high mortality. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) in the treatment of AKI requiring continuous renal repla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132482 |
_version_ | 1782384454072795136 |
---|---|
author | Tumlin, James A. Galphin, Claude M. Tolwani, Ashita J. Chan, Micah R. Vijayan, Anitha Finkel, Kevin Szamosfalvi, Balazs Dev, Devasmita DaSilva, J. Ricardo Astor, Brad C. Yevzlin, Alexander S. Humes, H. David |
author_facet | Tumlin, James A. Galphin, Claude M. Tolwani, Ashita J. Chan, Micah R. Vijayan, Anitha Finkel, Kevin Szamosfalvi, Balazs Dev, Devasmita DaSilva, J. Ricardo Astor, Brad C. Yevzlin, Alexander S. Humes, H. David |
author_sort | Tumlin, James A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly morbid condition in critically ill patients that is associated with high mortality. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) in the treatment of AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: A randomized, controlled trial of 134 ICU patients with AKI, 69 received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) alone and 65 received SCD therapy. RESULTS: No significant difference in 60-day mortality was observed between the treated (27/69; 39%) and control patients (21/59; 36%, with six patients lost to follow up) in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Of the 19 SCD subjects (CRRT+SCD) and 31 control subjects (CRRT alone) who maintained a post-filter ionized calcium (iCa) level in the protocol’s recommended range (≤ 0.4mmol/L) for greater or equal to 90% of the therapy time, 60-day mortality was 16% (3/19) in the SCD group compared to 41% (11/27) in the CRRT alone group (p = 0.11). Dialysis dependency showed a borderline statistically significant difference between the SCD treated versus control CRRT alone patients maintained for ≥ 90% of the treatment in the protocol’s recommended (r) iCa target range of ≤ 0.4 mmol/L with values of, 0% (0/16) and 25% (4/16), respectively (P = 0.10). When the riCa treated and control subgroups were compared for a composite index of 60 day mortality and dialysis dependency, the percentage of SCD treated subjects was 16% versus 58% in the control subjects (p<0.01). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the treated (45/69; 65%) and control groups (40/65; 63%; p = 0·86). CONCLUSION: SCD therapy may improve mortality and reduce dialysis dependency in a tightly controlled regional hypocalcaemic environment in the perfusion circuit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01400893 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01400893 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4526678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45266782015-08-12 A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Tumlin, James A. Galphin, Claude M. Tolwani, Ashita J. Chan, Micah R. Vijayan, Anitha Finkel, Kevin Szamosfalvi, Balazs Dev, Devasmita DaSilva, J. Ricardo Astor, Brad C. Yevzlin, Alexander S. Humes, H. David PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly morbid condition in critically ill patients that is associated with high mortality. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) in the treatment of AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: A randomized, controlled trial of 134 ICU patients with AKI, 69 received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) alone and 65 received SCD therapy. RESULTS: No significant difference in 60-day mortality was observed between the treated (27/69; 39%) and control patients (21/59; 36%, with six patients lost to follow up) in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Of the 19 SCD subjects (CRRT+SCD) and 31 control subjects (CRRT alone) who maintained a post-filter ionized calcium (iCa) level in the protocol’s recommended range (≤ 0.4mmol/L) for greater or equal to 90% of the therapy time, 60-day mortality was 16% (3/19) in the SCD group compared to 41% (11/27) in the CRRT alone group (p = 0.11). Dialysis dependency showed a borderline statistically significant difference between the SCD treated versus control CRRT alone patients maintained for ≥ 90% of the treatment in the protocol’s recommended (r) iCa target range of ≤ 0.4 mmol/L with values of, 0% (0/16) and 25% (4/16), respectively (P = 0.10). When the riCa treated and control subgroups were compared for a composite index of 60 day mortality and dialysis dependency, the percentage of SCD treated subjects was 16% versus 58% in the control subjects (p<0.01). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the treated (45/69; 65%) and control groups (40/65; 63%; p = 0·86). CONCLUSION: SCD therapy may improve mortality and reduce dialysis dependency in a tightly controlled regional hypocalcaemic environment in the perfusion circuit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01400893 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01400893 Public Library of Science 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4526678/ /pubmed/26244978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132482 Text en © 2015 Tumlin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tumlin, James A. Galphin, Claude M. Tolwani, Ashita J. Chan, Micah R. Vijayan, Anitha Finkel, Kevin Szamosfalvi, Balazs Dev, Devasmita DaSilva, J. Ricardo Astor, Brad C. Yevzlin, Alexander S. Humes, H. David A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury |
title | A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury |
title_full | A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury |
title_fullStr | A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury |
title_short | A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury |
title_sort | multi-center, randomized, controlled, pivotal study to assess the safety and efficacy of a selective cytopheretic device in patients with acute kidney injury |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tumlinjamesa amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT galphinclaudem amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT tolwaniashitaj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT chanmicahr amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT vijayananitha amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT finkelkevin amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT szamosfalvibalazs amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT devdevasmita amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT dasilvajricardo amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT astorbradc amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT yevzlinalexanders amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT humeshdavid amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT tumlinjamesa multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT galphinclaudem multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT tolwaniashitaj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT chanmicahr multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT vijayananitha multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT finkelkevin multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT szamosfalvibalazs multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT devdevasmita multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT dasilvajricardo multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT astorbradc multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT yevzlinalexanders multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT humeshdavid multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury AT multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury |