Cargando…

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly morbid condition in critically ill patients that is associated with high mortality. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) in the treatment of AKI requiring continuous renal repla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tumlin, James A., Galphin, Claude M., Tolwani, Ashita J., Chan, Micah R., Vijayan, Anitha, Finkel, Kevin, Szamosfalvi, Balazs, Dev, Devasmita, DaSilva, J. Ricardo, Astor, Brad C., Yevzlin, Alexander S., Humes, H. David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132482
_version_ 1782384454072795136
author Tumlin, James A.
Galphin, Claude M.
Tolwani, Ashita J.
Chan, Micah R.
Vijayan, Anitha
Finkel, Kevin
Szamosfalvi, Balazs
Dev, Devasmita
DaSilva, J. Ricardo
Astor, Brad C.
Yevzlin, Alexander S.
Humes, H. David
author_facet Tumlin, James A.
Galphin, Claude M.
Tolwani, Ashita J.
Chan, Micah R.
Vijayan, Anitha
Finkel, Kevin
Szamosfalvi, Balazs
Dev, Devasmita
DaSilva, J. Ricardo
Astor, Brad C.
Yevzlin, Alexander S.
Humes, H. David
author_sort Tumlin, James A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly morbid condition in critically ill patients that is associated with high mortality. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) in the treatment of AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: A randomized, controlled trial of 134 ICU patients with AKI, 69 received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) alone and 65 received SCD therapy. RESULTS: No significant difference in 60-day mortality was observed between the treated (27/69; 39%) and control patients (21/59; 36%, with six patients lost to follow up) in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Of the 19 SCD subjects (CRRT+SCD) and 31 control subjects (CRRT alone) who maintained a post-filter ionized calcium (iCa) level in the protocol’s recommended range (≤ 0.4mmol/L) for greater or equal to 90% of the therapy time, 60-day mortality was 16% (3/19) in the SCD group compared to 41% (11/27) in the CRRT alone group (p = 0.11). Dialysis dependency showed a borderline statistically significant difference between the SCD treated versus control CRRT alone patients maintained for ≥ 90% of the treatment in the protocol’s recommended (r) iCa target range of ≤ 0.4 mmol/L with values of, 0% (0/16) and 25% (4/16), respectively (P = 0.10). When the riCa treated and control subgroups were compared for a composite index of 60 day mortality and dialysis dependency, the percentage of SCD treated subjects was 16% versus 58% in the control subjects (p<0.01). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the treated (45/69; 65%) and control groups (40/65; 63%; p = 0·86). CONCLUSION: SCD therapy may improve mortality and reduce dialysis dependency in a tightly controlled regional hypocalcaemic environment in the perfusion circuit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01400893 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01400893
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4526678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45266782015-08-12 A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Tumlin, James A. Galphin, Claude M. Tolwani, Ashita J. Chan, Micah R. Vijayan, Anitha Finkel, Kevin Szamosfalvi, Balazs Dev, Devasmita DaSilva, J. Ricardo Astor, Brad C. Yevzlin, Alexander S. Humes, H. David PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly morbid condition in critically ill patients that is associated with high mortality. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) in the treatment of AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: A randomized, controlled trial of 134 ICU patients with AKI, 69 received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) alone and 65 received SCD therapy. RESULTS: No significant difference in 60-day mortality was observed between the treated (27/69; 39%) and control patients (21/59; 36%, with six patients lost to follow up) in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Of the 19 SCD subjects (CRRT+SCD) and 31 control subjects (CRRT alone) who maintained a post-filter ionized calcium (iCa) level in the protocol’s recommended range (≤ 0.4mmol/L) for greater or equal to 90% of the therapy time, 60-day mortality was 16% (3/19) in the SCD group compared to 41% (11/27) in the CRRT alone group (p = 0.11). Dialysis dependency showed a borderline statistically significant difference between the SCD treated versus control CRRT alone patients maintained for ≥ 90% of the treatment in the protocol’s recommended (r) iCa target range of ≤ 0.4 mmol/L with values of, 0% (0/16) and 25% (4/16), respectively (P = 0.10). When the riCa treated and control subgroups were compared for a composite index of 60 day mortality and dialysis dependency, the percentage of SCD treated subjects was 16% versus 58% in the control subjects (p<0.01). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the treated (45/69; 65%) and control groups (40/65; 63%; p = 0·86). CONCLUSION: SCD therapy may improve mortality and reduce dialysis dependency in a tightly controlled regional hypocalcaemic environment in the perfusion circuit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01400893 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01400893 Public Library of Science 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4526678/ /pubmed/26244978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132482 Text en © 2015 Tumlin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tumlin, James A.
Galphin, Claude M.
Tolwani, Ashita J.
Chan, Micah R.
Vijayan, Anitha
Finkel, Kevin
Szamosfalvi, Balazs
Dev, Devasmita
DaSilva, J. Ricardo
Astor, Brad C.
Yevzlin, Alexander S.
Humes, H. David
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_full A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_fullStr A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_full_unstemmed A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_short A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_sort multi-center, randomized, controlled, pivotal study to assess the safety and efficacy of a selective cytopheretic device in patients with acute kidney injury
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132482
work_keys_str_mv AT tumlinjamesa amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT galphinclaudem amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT tolwaniashitaj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT chanmicahr amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT vijayananitha amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT finkelkevin amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT szamosfalvibalazs amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT devdevasmita amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT dasilvajricardo amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT astorbradc amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT yevzlinalexanders amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT humeshdavid amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT tumlinjamesa multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT galphinclaudem multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT tolwaniashitaj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT chanmicahr multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT vijayananitha multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT finkelkevin multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT szamosfalvibalazs multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT devdevasmita multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT dasilvajricardo multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT astorbradc multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT yevzlinalexanders multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT humeshdavid multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT multicenterrandomizedcontrolledpivotalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofaselectivecytophereticdeviceinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury