Cargando…

Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses

Auditory evoked potential (AEP) is an effective index for the effects of general anesthetics. However, it’s unknown if AEP can differentiate the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses. Presently, we investigated AEP latency and amplitude changes to different acoustic intensities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Bowan, Liang, Feixue, Zhong, Lei, Lin, Minlin, Yang, Juan, Yan, Linqing, Xiao, Jinfan, Xiao, Zhongju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12730
_version_ 1782384477781098496
author Huang, Bowan
Liang, Feixue
Zhong, Lei
Lin, Minlin
Yang, Juan
Yan, Linqing
Xiao, Jinfan
Xiao, Zhongju
author_facet Huang, Bowan
Liang, Feixue
Zhong, Lei
Lin, Minlin
Yang, Juan
Yan, Linqing
Xiao, Jinfan
Xiao, Zhongju
author_sort Huang, Bowan
collection PubMed
description Auditory evoked potential (AEP) is an effective index for the effects of general anesthetics. However, it’s unknown if AEP can differentiate the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses. Presently, we investigated AEP latency and amplitude changes to different acoustic intensities during pentobarbital anesthesia. Latency more regularly changed than amplitude during anesthesia. AEP Latency monotonically decreased with acoustic intensity increase (i.e., latency-intensity curve) and could be fitted to an exponential decay equation, which showed two components, the theoretical minimum latency and stimulus-dependent delay. From the latency-intensity curves, the changes of these two components (∆L and ∆I) were extracted during anesthesia. ∆L and ∆I monitored the effect of pentobarbital on nerve fibers and synapses. Pentobarbital can induce anesthesia, and two side effects, hypoxemia and hypothermia. The hypoxemia was not related with ∆L and ∆I. However, ∆L was changed by the hypothermia, whereas ∆I was changed by the hypothermia and anesthesia. Therefore, we conclude that, AEP latency is superior to amplitude for the effects of general anesthetics, ∆L monitors the effect of hypothermia on nerve fibers, and ∆I monitors a combined effect of anesthesia and hypothermia on synapses. When eliminating the temperature factor, ∆I monitors the anesthesia effect on synapses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4526847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45268472015-08-07 Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses Huang, Bowan Liang, Feixue Zhong, Lei Lin, Minlin Yang, Juan Yan, Linqing Xiao, Jinfan Xiao, Zhongju Sci Rep Article Auditory evoked potential (AEP) is an effective index for the effects of general anesthetics. However, it’s unknown if AEP can differentiate the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses. Presently, we investigated AEP latency and amplitude changes to different acoustic intensities during pentobarbital anesthesia. Latency more regularly changed than amplitude during anesthesia. AEP Latency monotonically decreased with acoustic intensity increase (i.e., latency-intensity curve) and could be fitted to an exponential decay equation, which showed two components, the theoretical minimum latency and stimulus-dependent delay. From the latency-intensity curves, the changes of these two components (∆L and ∆I) were extracted during anesthesia. ∆L and ∆I monitored the effect of pentobarbital on nerve fibers and synapses. Pentobarbital can induce anesthesia, and two side effects, hypoxemia and hypothermia. The hypoxemia was not related with ∆L and ∆I. However, ∆L was changed by the hypothermia, whereas ∆I was changed by the hypothermia and anesthesia. Therefore, we conclude that, AEP latency is superior to amplitude for the effects of general anesthetics, ∆L monitors the effect of hypothermia on nerve fibers, and ∆I monitors a combined effect of anesthesia and hypothermia on synapses. When eliminating the temperature factor, ∆I monitors the anesthesia effect on synapses. Nature Publishing Group 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4526847/ /pubmed/26246365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12730 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Bowan
Liang, Feixue
Zhong, Lei
Lin, Minlin
Yang, Juan
Yan, Linqing
Xiao, Jinfan
Xiao, Zhongju
Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses
title Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses
title_full Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses
title_fullStr Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses
title_full_unstemmed Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses
title_short Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses
title_sort latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12730
work_keys_str_mv AT huangbowan latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses
AT liangfeixue latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses
AT zhonglei latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses
AT linminlin latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses
AT yangjuan latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses
AT yanlinqing latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses
AT xiaojinfan latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses
AT xiaozhongju latencyofauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringtheeffectsofgeneralanestheticsonnervefibersandsynapses