Cargando…
Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix
We compared the antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities of five root canal irrigants (17% EDTA,2% chlorhexidine,0.2% cetrimide, MTAD, and QMix) in a model of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation. Sixty dentin blocks with 3-week E. faecalis biofilm were divided into six equal groups an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12944 |
_version_ | 1782384485921193984 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Rui Chen, Min Lu, Yan Guo, Xiangjun Qiao, Feng Wu, Ligeng |
author_facet | Zhang, Rui Chen, Min Lu, Yan Guo, Xiangjun Qiao, Feng Wu, Ligeng |
author_sort | Zhang, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared the antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities of five root canal irrigants (17% EDTA,2% chlorhexidine,0.2% cetrimide, MTAD, and QMix) in a model of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation. Sixty dentin blocks with 3-week E. faecalis biofilm were divided into six equal groups and flushed with irrigant for 2 min or left untreated. A blank control group was also established. Antibacterial activities of the irrigants were evaluated by counting colony forming units. To test residual antimicrobial activities, 280 dentin blocks were divided into seven equal groups and flushed with irrigant for 2 min or left untreated and then incubated with E. faecalis suspension for 48 h, or used as a blank. No bacteria were observed in the blank control group. The number of viable E. faecalis was significantly fewer in the irrigant-treated groups compared with the untreated control (P < 0.05). Among the five irrigants, QMix had the strongest antibacterial activity. Residual antimicrobial activities of CHX were significantly higher at 12 h, 24 h and 36 h compared to untreated control (P < 0.05). All five root canal irrigants were effective to some extent against E. faecalis, but QMix and CHX had the strongest, and CHX the longest (up to 36 h), antimicrobial activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4526883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45268832015-08-07 Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix Zhang, Rui Chen, Min Lu, Yan Guo, Xiangjun Qiao, Feng Wu, Ligeng Sci Rep Article We compared the antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities of five root canal irrigants (17% EDTA,2% chlorhexidine,0.2% cetrimide, MTAD, and QMix) in a model of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation. Sixty dentin blocks with 3-week E. faecalis biofilm were divided into six equal groups and flushed with irrigant for 2 min or left untreated. A blank control group was also established. Antibacterial activities of the irrigants were evaluated by counting colony forming units. To test residual antimicrobial activities, 280 dentin blocks were divided into seven equal groups and flushed with irrigant for 2 min or left untreated and then incubated with E. faecalis suspension for 48 h, or used as a blank. No bacteria were observed in the blank control group. The number of viable E. faecalis was significantly fewer in the irrigant-treated groups compared with the untreated control (P < 0.05). Among the five irrigants, QMix had the strongest antibacterial activity. Residual antimicrobial activities of CHX were significantly higher at 12 h, 24 h and 36 h compared to untreated control (P < 0.05). All five root canal irrigants were effective to some extent against E. faecalis, but QMix and CHX had the strongest, and CHX the longest (up to 36 h), antimicrobial activity. Nature Publishing Group 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4526883/ /pubmed/26245711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12944 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Rui Chen, Min Lu, Yan Guo, Xiangjun Qiao, Feng Wu, Ligeng Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix |
title | Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix |
title_full | Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix |
title_fullStr | Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix |
title_short | Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix |
title_sort | antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against enterococcus faecalis biofilm: a comparison between edta, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, mtad and qmix |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangrui antibacterialandresidualantimicrobialactivitiesagainstenterococcusfaecalisbiofilmacomparisonbetweenedtachlorhexidinecetrimidemtadandqmix AT chenmin antibacterialandresidualantimicrobialactivitiesagainstenterococcusfaecalisbiofilmacomparisonbetweenedtachlorhexidinecetrimidemtadandqmix AT luyan antibacterialandresidualantimicrobialactivitiesagainstenterococcusfaecalisbiofilmacomparisonbetweenedtachlorhexidinecetrimidemtadandqmix AT guoxiangjun antibacterialandresidualantimicrobialactivitiesagainstenterococcusfaecalisbiofilmacomparisonbetweenedtachlorhexidinecetrimidemtadandqmix AT qiaofeng antibacterialandresidualantimicrobialactivitiesagainstenterococcusfaecalisbiofilmacomparisonbetweenedtachlorhexidinecetrimidemtadandqmix AT wuligeng antibacterialandresidualantimicrobialactivitiesagainstenterococcusfaecalisbiofilmacomparisonbetweenedtachlorhexidinecetrimidemtadandqmix |