Cargando…

Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review

BACKGROUND: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adopt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irizarry, Taya, DeVito Dabbs, Annette, Curran, Christine R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104044
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255
_version_ 1782384502968942592
author Irizarry, Taya
DeVito Dabbs, Annette
Curran, Christine R
author_facet Irizarry, Taya
DeVito Dabbs, Annette
Curran, Christine R
author_sort Irizarry, Taya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adoption of patient portals and what factors might contribute to sustained utilization. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this state of the science review are to (1) present the definition, background, and how current literature addresses the encouragement and support of patient engagement through the patient portal, and (2) provide a summary of future directions for patient portal research and development to meaningfully impact patient engagement. METHODS: We reviewed literature from 2006 through 2014 in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycInfo using the search terms “patient portal” OR “personal health record” OR “electronic personal health record”. Final inclusion criterion dictated that studies report on the patient experience and/or ways that patients may be supported to make competent health care decisions and act on those decisions using patient portal functionality. RESULTS: We found 120 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the research questions, explicit and implicit aims of the studies, and related measures addressed, the studies were grouped into five major topics (patient adoption, provider endorsement, health literacy, usability, and utility). We discuss the findings and conclusions of studies that address the five topical areas. CONCLUSIONS: Current research has demonstrated that patients’ interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient portal usability also contribute to patient’s ability to engage through and with the patient portal. Future directions of research should focus on identifying specific populations and contextual considerations that would benefit most from a greater degree of patient engagement through a patient portal. Ultimately, adoption by patients and endorsement by providers will come when existing patient portal features align with patients’ and providers’ information needs and functionality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4526960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45269602015-08-11 Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review Irizarry, Taya DeVito Dabbs, Annette Curran, Christine R J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adoption of patient portals and what factors might contribute to sustained utilization. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this state of the science review are to (1) present the definition, background, and how current literature addresses the encouragement and support of patient engagement through the patient portal, and (2) provide a summary of future directions for patient portal research and development to meaningfully impact patient engagement. METHODS: We reviewed literature from 2006 through 2014 in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycInfo using the search terms “patient portal” OR “personal health record” OR “electronic personal health record”. Final inclusion criterion dictated that studies report on the patient experience and/or ways that patients may be supported to make competent health care decisions and act on those decisions using patient portal functionality. RESULTS: We found 120 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the research questions, explicit and implicit aims of the studies, and related measures addressed, the studies were grouped into five major topics (patient adoption, provider endorsement, health literacy, usability, and utility). We discuss the findings and conclusions of studies that address the five topical areas. CONCLUSIONS: Current research has demonstrated that patients’ interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient portal usability also contribute to patient’s ability to engage through and with the patient portal. Future directions of research should focus on identifying specific populations and contextual considerations that would benefit most from a greater degree of patient engagement through a patient portal. Ultimately, adoption by patients and endorsement by providers will come when existing patient portal features align with patients’ and providers’ information needs and functionality. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4526960/ /pubmed/26104044 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255 Text en ©Taya Irizarry, Annette DeVito Dabbs, Christine R Curran. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 23.06.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Irizarry, Taya
DeVito Dabbs, Annette
Curran, Christine R
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
title Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
title_full Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
title_fullStr Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
title_full_unstemmed Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
title_short Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
title_sort patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104044
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255
work_keys_str_mv AT irizarrytaya patientportalsandpatientengagementastateofthesciencereview
AT devitodabbsannette patientportalsandpatientengagementastateofthesciencereview
AT curranchristiner patientportalsandpatientengagementastateofthesciencereview