Cargando…
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
BACKGROUND: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adopt...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104044 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255 |
_version_ | 1782384502968942592 |
---|---|
author | Irizarry, Taya DeVito Dabbs, Annette Curran, Christine R |
author_facet | Irizarry, Taya DeVito Dabbs, Annette Curran, Christine R |
author_sort | Irizarry, Taya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adoption of patient portals and what factors might contribute to sustained utilization. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this state of the science review are to (1) present the definition, background, and how current literature addresses the encouragement and support of patient engagement through the patient portal, and (2) provide a summary of future directions for patient portal research and development to meaningfully impact patient engagement. METHODS: We reviewed literature from 2006 through 2014 in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycInfo using the search terms “patient portal” OR “personal health record” OR “electronic personal health record”. Final inclusion criterion dictated that studies report on the patient experience and/or ways that patients may be supported to make competent health care decisions and act on those decisions using patient portal functionality. RESULTS: We found 120 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the research questions, explicit and implicit aims of the studies, and related measures addressed, the studies were grouped into five major topics (patient adoption, provider endorsement, health literacy, usability, and utility). We discuss the findings and conclusions of studies that address the five topical areas. CONCLUSIONS: Current research has demonstrated that patients’ interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient portal usability also contribute to patient’s ability to engage through and with the patient portal. Future directions of research should focus on identifying specific populations and contextual considerations that would benefit most from a greater degree of patient engagement through a patient portal. Ultimately, adoption by patients and endorsement by providers will come when existing patient portal features align with patients’ and providers’ information needs and functionality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4526960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45269602015-08-11 Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review Irizarry, Taya DeVito Dabbs, Annette Curran, Christine R J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adoption of patient portals and what factors might contribute to sustained utilization. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this state of the science review are to (1) present the definition, background, and how current literature addresses the encouragement and support of patient engagement through the patient portal, and (2) provide a summary of future directions for patient portal research and development to meaningfully impact patient engagement. METHODS: We reviewed literature from 2006 through 2014 in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycInfo using the search terms “patient portal” OR “personal health record” OR “electronic personal health record”. Final inclusion criterion dictated that studies report on the patient experience and/or ways that patients may be supported to make competent health care decisions and act on those decisions using patient portal functionality. RESULTS: We found 120 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the research questions, explicit and implicit aims of the studies, and related measures addressed, the studies were grouped into five major topics (patient adoption, provider endorsement, health literacy, usability, and utility). We discuss the findings and conclusions of studies that address the five topical areas. CONCLUSIONS: Current research has demonstrated that patients’ interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient portal usability also contribute to patient’s ability to engage through and with the patient portal. Future directions of research should focus on identifying specific populations and contextual considerations that would benefit most from a greater degree of patient engagement through a patient portal. Ultimately, adoption by patients and endorsement by providers will come when existing patient portal features align with patients’ and providers’ information needs and functionality. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4526960/ /pubmed/26104044 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255 Text en ©Taya Irizarry, Annette DeVito Dabbs, Christine R Curran. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 23.06.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Irizarry, Taya DeVito Dabbs, Annette Curran, Christine R Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review |
title | Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review |
title_full | Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review |
title_fullStr | Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review |
title_short | Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review |
title_sort | patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104044 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT irizarrytaya patientportalsandpatientengagementastateofthesciencereview AT devitodabbsannette patientportalsandpatientengagementastateofthesciencereview AT curranchristiner patientportalsandpatientengagementastateofthesciencereview |