Cargando…
Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks
Fear learning is thought to play an important role in panic disorder. Benign interoceptive sensations can become predictors (conditioned stimuli – CSs) of massive fear when experienced in the context of an initial panic attack (unconditioned stimulus – US). The mere encounter of these CSs on a later...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01150 |
_version_ | 1782384523594432512 |
---|---|
author | Pappens, Meike Vandenbossche, Evelien Van den Bergh, Omer Van Diest, Ilse |
author_facet | Pappens, Meike Vandenbossche, Evelien Van den Bergh, Omer Van Diest, Ilse |
author_sort | Pappens, Meike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fear learning is thought to play an important role in panic disorder. Benign interoceptive sensations can become predictors (conditioned stimuli – CSs) of massive fear when experienced in the context of an initial panic attack (unconditioned stimulus – US). The mere encounter of these CSs on a later moment can induce anxiety and fear, and precipitate a new panic attack. It has been suggested that fear learning to interoceptive cues would result in unpredictable panic. The present study aimed to investigate whether fear learning to an interoceptive CS is possible without declarative knowledge of the CS–US contingency. The CS consisted of mild breathlessness (or: dyspnea), the US was a suffocation experience. During acquisition, the experimental group received six presentations of mild breathlessness immediately followed by suffocation; for the control group both experiences were always separated by an intertrial interval. In the subsequent extinction phase, participants received six unreinforced presentations of the CS. Expectancy of the US was rated continuously and startle eyeblink electromyographic, skin conductance, and respiration were measured. Declarative knowledge of the CS–US relationship was also assessed with a post-experimental questionnaire. At the end of acquisition, both groups displayed the same levels of US expectancy and skin conductance in response to the CS, but the experimental group showed a fear potentiated startle eyeblink and a different respiratory response to the CS compared to the control group. Further analyses on a subgroup of CS–US unaware participants confirmed the presence of startle eyeblink conditioning in the experimental group but not in the control group. Our findings suggest that interoceptive fear learning is not dependent on declarative knowledge of the CS–US relationship. The present interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm may serve as an ecologically valid laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4527095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45270952015-08-21 Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks Pappens, Meike Vandenbossche, Evelien Van den Bergh, Omer Van Diest, Ilse Front Psychol Psychology Fear learning is thought to play an important role in panic disorder. Benign interoceptive sensations can become predictors (conditioned stimuli – CSs) of massive fear when experienced in the context of an initial panic attack (unconditioned stimulus – US). The mere encounter of these CSs on a later moment can induce anxiety and fear, and precipitate a new panic attack. It has been suggested that fear learning to interoceptive cues would result in unpredictable panic. The present study aimed to investigate whether fear learning to an interoceptive CS is possible without declarative knowledge of the CS–US contingency. The CS consisted of mild breathlessness (or: dyspnea), the US was a suffocation experience. During acquisition, the experimental group received six presentations of mild breathlessness immediately followed by suffocation; for the control group both experiences were always separated by an intertrial interval. In the subsequent extinction phase, participants received six unreinforced presentations of the CS. Expectancy of the US was rated continuously and startle eyeblink electromyographic, skin conductance, and respiration were measured. Declarative knowledge of the CS–US relationship was also assessed with a post-experimental questionnaire. At the end of acquisition, both groups displayed the same levels of US expectancy and skin conductance in response to the CS, but the experimental group showed a fear potentiated startle eyeblink and a different respiratory response to the CS compared to the control group. Further analyses on a subgroup of CS–US unaware participants confirmed the presence of startle eyeblink conditioning in the experimental group but not in the control group. Our findings suggest that interoceptive fear learning is not dependent on declarative knowledge of the CS–US relationship. The present interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm may serve as an ecologically valid laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4527095/ /pubmed/26300830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01150 Text en Copyright © 2015 Pappens, Vandenbossche, Van den Bergh and Van Diest. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Pappens, Meike Vandenbossche, Evelien Van den Bergh, Omer Van Diest, Ilse Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks |
title | Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks |
title_full | Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks |
title_fullStr | Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks |
title_full_unstemmed | Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks |
title_short | Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks |
title_sort | interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pappensmeike interoceptivefearlearningtomildbreathlessnessasalaboratorymodelforunexpectedpanicattacks AT vandenbosscheevelien interoceptivefearlearningtomildbreathlessnessasalaboratorymodelforunexpectedpanicattacks AT vandenberghomer interoceptivefearlearningtomildbreathlessnessasalaboratorymodelforunexpectedpanicattacks AT vandiestilse interoceptivefearlearningtomildbreathlessnessasalaboratorymodelforunexpectedpanicattacks |