Cargando…

Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?

Current means of measuring RT-induced fibrosis are subjective. We evaluated the DermaLab suction cup system to measure objectively skin deflection as a surrogate for fibrosis. Sixty-nine patients with E-STS were treated with limb-sparing surgery and 50-66 Grays (Gy) of RT. Using a “scleroderma” Derm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A., Roberge, David, Freeman, Carolyn R., Wong, Cindy, Hines, Jerod, Turcotte, Robert E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24000984
http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600257
_version_ 1782384568579391488
author Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A.
Roberge, David
Freeman, Carolyn R.
Wong, Cindy
Hines, Jerod
Turcotte, Robert E.
author_facet Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A.
Roberge, David
Freeman, Carolyn R.
Wong, Cindy
Hines, Jerod
Turcotte, Robert E.
author_sort Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A.
collection PubMed
description Current means of measuring RT-induced fibrosis are subjective. We evaluated the DermaLab suction cup system to measure objectively skin deflection as a surrogate for fibrosis. Sixty-nine patients with E-STS were treated with limb-sparing surgery and 50-66 Grays (Gy) of RT. Using a “scleroderma” DermaLab Suction Cup, the skin stiffness was measured by two clinicians. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Rating Scale (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) questionnaires were completed for each patient. Levels of agreement between measurers were estimated using the Kappa (κ) coefficient and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). All sixty-nine patients were included. The level of agreement between measurers for NCI-CTCAE grading was moderate (range κ = 0.41-0.59). The CCC for the elasticity measurements were higher, with CCC = 0.82 for fibrotic skin and CCC = 0.84 for normal skin. The elasticity measurements were significantly higher when MSTS scores were <30 and or TESS scores were <90. Suction Cup measurement of skin elasticity is more reproducible than CTCAE grading and shows promise in generating reproducible measurements for radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Furthermore, it correlates well with the MSTS and TESS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4527462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45274622015-11-06 Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A. Roberge, David Freeman, Carolyn R. Wong, Cindy Hines, Jerod Turcotte, Robert E. Technol Cancer Res Treat Articles Current means of measuring RT-induced fibrosis are subjective. We evaluated the DermaLab suction cup system to measure objectively skin deflection as a surrogate for fibrosis. Sixty-nine patients with E-STS were treated with limb-sparing surgery and 50-66 Grays (Gy) of RT. Using a “scleroderma” DermaLab Suction Cup, the skin stiffness was measured by two clinicians. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Rating Scale (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) questionnaires were completed for each patient. Levels of agreement between measurers were estimated using the Kappa (κ) coefficient and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). All sixty-nine patients were included. The level of agreement between measurers for NCI-CTCAE grading was moderate (range κ = 0.41-0.59). The CCC for the elasticity measurements were higher, with CCC = 0.82 for fibrotic skin and CCC = 0.84 for normal skin. The elasticity measurements were significantly higher when MSTS scores were <30 and or TESS scores were <90. Suction Cup measurement of skin elasticity is more reproducible than CTCAE grading and shows promise in generating reproducible measurements for radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Furthermore, it correlates well with the MSTS and TESS. SAGE Publications 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4527462/ /pubmed/24000984 http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600257 Text en © Adenine Press (2014) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A.
Roberge, David
Freeman, Carolyn R.
Wong, Cindy
Hines, Jerod
Turcotte, Robert E.
Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?
title Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?
title_full Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?
title_fullStr Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?
title_full_unstemmed Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?
title_short Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?
title_sort skin elasticity as a measure of radiation fibrosis: is it reproducible and does it correlate with patient and physician-reported measures?
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24000984
http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600257
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyennhutrama skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures
AT robergedavid skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures
AT freemancarolynr skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures
AT wongcindy skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures
AT hinesjerod skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures
AT turcotteroberte skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures