Cargando…
Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures?
Current means of measuring RT-induced fibrosis are subjective. We evaluated the DermaLab suction cup system to measure objectively skin deflection as a surrogate for fibrosis. Sixty-nine patients with E-STS were treated with limb-sparing surgery and 50-66 Grays (Gy) of RT. Using a “scleroderma” Derm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24000984 http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600257 |
_version_ | 1782384568579391488 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A. Roberge, David Freeman, Carolyn R. Wong, Cindy Hines, Jerod Turcotte, Robert E. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A. Roberge, David Freeman, Carolyn R. Wong, Cindy Hines, Jerod Turcotte, Robert E. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current means of measuring RT-induced fibrosis are subjective. We evaluated the DermaLab suction cup system to measure objectively skin deflection as a surrogate for fibrosis. Sixty-nine patients with E-STS were treated with limb-sparing surgery and 50-66 Grays (Gy) of RT. Using a “scleroderma” DermaLab Suction Cup, the skin stiffness was measured by two clinicians. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Rating Scale (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) questionnaires were completed for each patient. Levels of agreement between measurers were estimated using the Kappa (κ) coefficient and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). All sixty-nine patients were included. The level of agreement between measurers for NCI-CTCAE grading was moderate (range κ = 0.41-0.59). The CCC for the elasticity measurements were higher, with CCC = 0.82 for fibrotic skin and CCC = 0.84 for normal skin. The elasticity measurements were significantly higher when MSTS scores were <30 and or TESS scores were <90. Suction Cup measurement of skin elasticity is more reproducible than CTCAE grading and shows promise in generating reproducible measurements for radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Furthermore, it correlates well with the MSTS and TESS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4527462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45274622015-11-06 Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A. Roberge, David Freeman, Carolyn R. Wong, Cindy Hines, Jerod Turcotte, Robert E. Technol Cancer Res Treat Articles Current means of measuring RT-induced fibrosis are subjective. We evaluated the DermaLab suction cup system to measure objectively skin deflection as a surrogate for fibrosis. Sixty-nine patients with E-STS were treated with limb-sparing surgery and 50-66 Grays (Gy) of RT. Using a “scleroderma” DermaLab Suction Cup, the skin stiffness was measured by two clinicians. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Rating Scale (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) questionnaires were completed for each patient. Levels of agreement between measurers were estimated using the Kappa (κ) coefficient and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). All sixty-nine patients were included. The level of agreement between measurers for NCI-CTCAE grading was moderate (range κ = 0.41-0.59). The CCC for the elasticity measurements were higher, with CCC = 0.82 for fibrotic skin and CCC = 0.84 for normal skin. The elasticity measurements were significantly higher when MSTS scores were <30 and or TESS scores were <90. Suction Cup measurement of skin elasticity is more reproducible than CTCAE grading and shows promise in generating reproducible measurements for radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Furthermore, it correlates well with the MSTS and TESS. SAGE Publications 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4527462/ /pubmed/24000984 http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600257 Text en © Adenine Press (2014) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Nguyen, Nhu-Tram A. Roberge, David Freeman, Carolyn R. Wong, Cindy Hines, Jerod Turcotte, Robert E. Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? |
title | Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? |
title_full | Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? |
title_fullStr | Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? |
title_full_unstemmed | Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? |
title_short | Skin Elasticity as a Measure of Radiation Fibrosis: Is it Reproducible and Does it Correlate with Patient and Physician-reported Measures? |
title_sort | skin elasticity as a measure of radiation fibrosis: is it reproducible and does it correlate with patient and physician-reported measures? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24000984 http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyennhutrama skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures AT robergedavid skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures AT freemancarolynr skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures AT wongcindy skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures AT hinesjerod skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures AT turcotteroberte skinelasticityasameasureofradiationfibrosisisitreproducibleanddoesitcorrelatewithpatientandphysicianreportedmeasures |