Cargando…
Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14)
PURPOSE: Nurses and other healthcare workers frequently experience belief conflict, one of the most important, new stress-related problems in both academic and clinical fields. METHODS: In this study, using a sample of 1,683 nursing practitioners, we developed The Assessment of Belief Conflict in Re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129349 |
_version_ | 1782384608441008128 |
---|---|
author | Kyougoku, Makoto Teraoka, Mutsumi Masuda, Noriko Ooura, Mariko Abe, Yasushi |
author_facet | Kyougoku, Makoto Teraoka, Mutsumi Masuda, Noriko Ooura, Mariko Abe, Yasushi |
author_sort | Kyougoku, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Nurses and other healthcare workers frequently experience belief conflict, one of the most important, new stress-related problems in both academic and clinical fields. METHODS: In this study, using a sample of 1,683 nursing practitioners, we developed The Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14), a new scale that assesses belief conflict in the healthcare field. Standard psychometric procedures were used to develop and test the scale, including a qualitative framework concept and item-pool development, item reduction, and scale development. We analyzed the psychometric properties of ABCR-14 according to entropy, polyserial correlation coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, average variance extracted, Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and multidimensional item response theory (MIRT). RESULTS: The results of the analysis supported a three-factor model consisting of 14 items. The validity and reliability of ABCR-14 was suggested by evidence from high construct validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. The result of the MIRT offered strong support for good item response of item slope parameters and difficulty parameters. However, the ABCR-14 Likert scale might need to be explored from the MIRT point of view. Yet, as mentioned above, there is sufficient evidence to support that ABCR-14 has high validity and reliability. CONCLUSION: The ABCR-14 demonstrates good psychometric properties for nursing belief conflict. Further studies are recommended to confirm its application in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4527743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45277432015-08-12 Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14) Kyougoku, Makoto Teraoka, Mutsumi Masuda, Noriko Ooura, Mariko Abe, Yasushi PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Nurses and other healthcare workers frequently experience belief conflict, one of the most important, new stress-related problems in both academic and clinical fields. METHODS: In this study, using a sample of 1,683 nursing practitioners, we developed The Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14), a new scale that assesses belief conflict in the healthcare field. Standard psychometric procedures were used to develop and test the scale, including a qualitative framework concept and item-pool development, item reduction, and scale development. We analyzed the psychometric properties of ABCR-14 according to entropy, polyserial correlation coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, average variance extracted, Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and multidimensional item response theory (MIRT). RESULTS: The results of the analysis supported a three-factor model consisting of 14 items. The validity and reliability of ABCR-14 was suggested by evidence from high construct validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. The result of the MIRT offered strong support for good item response of item slope parameters and difficulty parameters. However, the ABCR-14 Likert scale might need to be explored from the MIRT point of view. Yet, as mentioned above, there is sufficient evidence to support that ABCR-14 has high validity and reliability. CONCLUSION: The ABCR-14 demonstrates good psychometric properties for nursing belief conflict. Further studies are recommended to confirm its application in clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4527743/ /pubmed/26247356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129349 Text en © 2015 Kyougoku et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kyougoku, Makoto Teraoka, Mutsumi Masuda, Noriko Ooura, Mariko Abe, Yasushi Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14) |
title | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14) |
title_full | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14) |
title_fullStr | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14) |
title_short | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14) |
title_sort | development of the assessment of belief conflict in relationship-14 (abcr-14) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kyougokumakoto developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT teraokamutsumi developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT masudanoriko developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT oouramariko developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT abeyasushi developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 |