Cargando…

Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass

Estimates of body mass often represent the founding assumption on which biomechanical and macroevolutionary hypotheses are based. Recently, a scaling equation was applied to a newly discovered titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur (Dreadnoughtus), yielding a 59 300 kg body mass estimate for this animal. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bates, Karl T., Falkingham, Peter L., Macaulay, Sophie, Brassey, Charlotte, Maidment, Susannah C. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0215
_version_ 1782384682602594304
author Bates, Karl T.
Falkingham, Peter L.
Macaulay, Sophie
Brassey, Charlotte
Maidment, Susannah C. R.
author_facet Bates, Karl T.
Falkingham, Peter L.
Macaulay, Sophie
Brassey, Charlotte
Maidment, Susannah C. R.
author_sort Bates, Karl T.
collection PubMed
description Estimates of body mass often represent the founding assumption on which biomechanical and macroevolutionary hypotheses are based. Recently, a scaling equation was applied to a newly discovered titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur (Dreadnoughtus), yielding a 59 300 kg body mass estimate for this animal. Herein, we use a modelling approach to examine the plausibility of this mass estimate for Dreadnoughtus. We find that 59 300 kg for Dreadnoughtus is highly implausible and demonstrate that masses above 40 000 kg require high body densities and expansions of soft tissue volume outside the skeleton several times greater than found in living quadrupedal mammals. Similar results from a small sample of other archosaurs suggests that lower-end mass estimates derived from scaling equations are most plausible for Dreadnoughtus, based on existing volumetric and density data from extant animals. Although volumetric models appear to more tightly constrain dinosaur body mass, there remains a clear need to further support these models with more exhaustive data from living animals. The relative and absolute discrepancies in mass predictions between volumetric models and scaling equations also indicate a need to systematically compare predictions across a wide size and taxonomic range to better inform studies of dinosaur body size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4528471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45284712015-08-11 Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass Bates, Karl T. Falkingham, Peter L. Macaulay, Sophie Brassey, Charlotte Maidment, Susannah C. R. Biol Lett Palaeontology Estimates of body mass often represent the founding assumption on which biomechanical and macroevolutionary hypotheses are based. Recently, a scaling equation was applied to a newly discovered titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur (Dreadnoughtus), yielding a 59 300 kg body mass estimate for this animal. Herein, we use a modelling approach to examine the plausibility of this mass estimate for Dreadnoughtus. We find that 59 300 kg for Dreadnoughtus is highly implausible and demonstrate that masses above 40 000 kg require high body densities and expansions of soft tissue volume outside the skeleton several times greater than found in living quadrupedal mammals. Similar results from a small sample of other archosaurs suggests that lower-end mass estimates derived from scaling equations are most plausible for Dreadnoughtus, based on existing volumetric and density data from extant animals. Although volumetric models appear to more tightly constrain dinosaur body mass, there remains a clear need to further support these models with more exhaustive data from living animals. The relative and absolute discrepancies in mass predictions between volumetric models and scaling equations also indicate a need to systematically compare predictions across a wide size and taxonomic range to better inform studies of dinosaur body size. The Royal Society 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4528471/ /pubmed/26063751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0215 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Palaeontology
Bates, Karl T.
Falkingham, Peter L.
Macaulay, Sophie
Brassey, Charlotte
Maidment, Susannah C. R.
Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass
title Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass
title_full Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass
title_fullStr Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass
title_full_unstemmed Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass
title_short Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass
title_sort downsizing a giant: re-evaluating dreadnoughtus body mass
topic Palaeontology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0215
work_keys_str_mv AT bateskarlt downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass
AT falkinghampeterl downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass
AT macaulaysophie downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass
AT brasseycharlotte downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass
AT maidmentsusannahcr downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass