Cargando…
Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass
Estimates of body mass often represent the founding assumption on which biomechanical and macroevolutionary hypotheses are based. Recently, a scaling equation was applied to a newly discovered titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur (Dreadnoughtus), yielding a 59 300 kg body mass estimate for this animal. H...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0215 |
_version_ | 1782384682602594304 |
---|---|
author | Bates, Karl T. Falkingham, Peter L. Macaulay, Sophie Brassey, Charlotte Maidment, Susannah C. R. |
author_facet | Bates, Karl T. Falkingham, Peter L. Macaulay, Sophie Brassey, Charlotte Maidment, Susannah C. R. |
author_sort | Bates, Karl T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Estimates of body mass often represent the founding assumption on which biomechanical and macroevolutionary hypotheses are based. Recently, a scaling equation was applied to a newly discovered titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur (Dreadnoughtus), yielding a 59 300 kg body mass estimate for this animal. Herein, we use a modelling approach to examine the plausibility of this mass estimate for Dreadnoughtus. We find that 59 300 kg for Dreadnoughtus is highly implausible and demonstrate that masses above 40 000 kg require high body densities and expansions of soft tissue volume outside the skeleton several times greater than found in living quadrupedal mammals. Similar results from a small sample of other archosaurs suggests that lower-end mass estimates derived from scaling equations are most plausible for Dreadnoughtus, based on existing volumetric and density data from extant animals. Although volumetric models appear to more tightly constrain dinosaur body mass, there remains a clear need to further support these models with more exhaustive data from living animals. The relative and absolute discrepancies in mass predictions between volumetric models and scaling equations also indicate a need to systematically compare predictions across a wide size and taxonomic range to better inform studies of dinosaur body size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4528471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45284712015-08-11 Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass Bates, Karl T. Falkingham, Peter L. Macaulay, Sophie Brassey, Charlotte Maidment, Susannah C. R. Biol Lett Palaeontology Estimates of body mass often represent the founding assumption on which biomechanical and macroevolutionary hypotheses are based. Recently, a scaling equation was applied to a newly discovered titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur (Dreadnoughtus), yielding a 59 300 kg body mass estimate for this animal. Herein, we use a modelling approach to examine the plausibility of this mass estimate for Dreadnoughtus. We find that 59 300 kg for Dreadnoughtus is highly implausible and demonstrate that masses above 40 000 kg require high body densities and expansions of soft tissue volume outside the skeleton several times greater than found in living quadrupedal mammals. Similar results from a small sample of other archosaurs suggests that lower-end mass estimates derived from scaling equations are most plausible for Dreadnoughtus, based on existing volumetric and density data from extant animals. Although volumetric models appear to more tightly constrain dinosaur body mass, there remains a clear need to further support these models with more exhaustive data from living animals. The relative and absolute discrepancies in mass predictions between volumetric models and scaling equations also indicate a need to systematically compare predictions across a wide size and taxonomic range to better inform studies of dinosaur body size. The Royal Society 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4528471/ /pubmed/26063751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0215 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Palaeontology Bates, Karl T. Falkingham, Peter L. Macaulay, Sophie Brassey, Charlotte Maidment, Susannah C. R. Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass |
title | Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass |
title_full | Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass |
title_fullStr | Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass |
title_full_unstemmed | Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass |
title_short | Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass |
title_sort | downsizing a giant: re-evaluating dreadnoughtus body mass |
topic | Palaeontology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bateskarlt downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass AT falkinghampeterl downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass AT macaulaysophie downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass AT brasseycharlotte downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass AT maidmentsusannahcr downsizingagiantreevaluatingdreadnoughtusbodymass |