Cargando…

Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypercoagulability increases the risk of arterial thrombosis; however, this effect may differ between various manifestations of arterial disease. METHODS: In this study, we compared the effect of coagulation factors as measures of hypercoagulability on the risk of ischaemic s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maino, Alberto, Rosendaal, Frits R., Algra, Ale, Peyvandi, Flora, Siegerink, Bob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4529149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26252207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133523
_version_ 1782384747959287808
author Maino, Alberto
Rosendaal, Frits R.
Algra, Ale
Peyvandi, Flora
Siegerink, Bob
author_facet Maino, Alberto
Rosendaal, Frits R.
Algra, Ale
Peyvandi, Flora
Siegerink, Bob
author_sort Maino, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypercoagulability increases the risk of arterial thrombosis; however, this effect may differ between various manifestations of arterial disease. METHODS: In this study, we compared the effect of coagulation factors as measures of hypercoagulability on the risk of ischaemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI) by performing a systematic review of the literature. The effect of a risk factor on IS (relative risk for IS, RR(IS)) was compared with the effect on MI (RR(MI)) by calculating their ratio (RRR = RR(IS)/RR(MI)). A relevant differential effect was considered when RRR was >1+ its own standard error (SE) or <1−SE. RESULTS: We identified 70 publications, describing results from 31 study populations, accounting for 351 markers of hypercoagulability. The majority (203/351, 58%) had an RRR greater than 1. A larger effect on IS risk than MI risk (RRE>1+1SE) was found in 49/343 (14%) markers. Of these, 18/49 (37%) had an RRR greater than 1+2SE. On the opposite side, a larger effect on MI risk (RRR<1-1SE) was found in only 17/343 (5%) markers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hypercoagulability has a more pronounced effect on the risk of IS than that of MI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4529149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45291492015-08-12 Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review Maino, Alberto Rosendaal, Frits R. Algra, Ale Peyvandi, Flora Siegerink, Bob PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypercoagulability increases the risk of arterial thrombosis; however, this effect may differ between various manifestations of arterial disease. METHODS: In this study, we compared the effect of coagulation factors as measures of hypercoagulability on the risk of ischaemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI) by performing a systematic review of the literature. The effect of a risk factor on IS (relative risk for IS, RR(IS)) was compared with the effect on MI (RR(MI)) by calculating their ratio (RRR = RR(IS)/RR(MI)). A relevant differential effect was considered when RRR was >1+ its own standard error (SE) or <1−SE. RESULTS: We identified 70 publications, describing results from 31 study populations, accounting for 351 markers of hypercoagulability. The majority (203/351, 58%) had an RRR greater than 1. A larger effect on IS risk than MI risk (RRE>1+1SE) was found in 49/343 (14%) markers. Of these, 18/49 (37%) had an RRR greater than 1+2SE. On the opposite side, a larger effect on MI risk (RRR<1-1SE) was found in only 17/343 (5%) markers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hypercoagulability has a more pronounced effect on the risk of IS than that of MI. Public Library of Science 2015-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4529149/ /pubmed/26252207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133523 Text en © 2015 Maino et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maino, Alberto
Rosendaal, Frits R.
Algra, Ale
Peyvandi, Flora
Siegerink, Bob
Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
title Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
title_full Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
title_short Hypercoagulability Is a Stronger Risk Factor for Ischaemic Stroke than for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
title_sort hypercoagulability is a stronger risk factor for ischaemic stroke than for myocardial infarction: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4529149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26252207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133523
work_keys_str_mv AT mainoalberto hypercoagulabilityisastrongerriskfactorforischaemicstrokethanformyocardialinfarctionasystematicreview
AT rosendaalfritsr hypercoagulabilityisastrongerriskfactorforischaemicstrokethanformyocardialinfarctionasystematicreview
AT algraale hypercoagulabilityisastrongerriskfactorforischaemicstrokethanformyocardialinfarctionasystematicreview
AT peyvandiflora hypercoagulabilityisastrongerriskfactorforischaemicstrokethanformyocardialinfarctionasystematicreview
AT siegerinkbob hypercoagulabilityisastrongerriskfactorforischaemicstrokethanformyocardialinfarctionasystematicreview