Cargando…
Silent pelvic splenosis: Case report
INTRODUCTION: Splenosis is a benign, usually asymptomatic, condition involving autotransplantation of splenic tissue that occurs frequently after splenic rupture caused by trauma or surgery [1]. Up to 67% of the patients presenting splenic rupture may develop splenosis [2]. The interval of time betw...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4529608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26197096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.10.100 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Splenosis is a benign, usually asymptomatic, condition involving autotransplantation of splenic tissue that occurs frequently after splenic rupture caused by trauma or surgery [1]. Up to 67% of the patients presenting splenic rupture may develop splenosis [2]. The interval of time between the initial trauma and the diagnosis varies from 3 to 45 years with an average interval of 21 years [3]. Since the finding of this entity is usually accidental, the real incidence is not well known. Although splenosis following traumatic splenectomy after traffic accidents is well-documented in the literature, there do not seem to be many reported cases where splenosis produced gynecological complications [4]. There were fewer than 100 cases of splenosis reported since the first report of Buchbinder and Lipkoff in 1939 [5] in the English language medical literature of which only a minority appeared in the gynecological literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A case of pelvic and omentum majus splenosis in a patient is presented. DISCUSSION: Pelvic splenosis remains a rare finding in clinical practice. In most reported cases in the literature, the diagnosis was not considered before surgery. This approach may obviate the need for invasive evaluation for a primary or secondary neoplasm, and thus unnecessary surgery, and therefore preserve probable functional splenic tissue. Our case was diagnosed using non-surgical modalities. CONCLUSION: Our case emphasizes the rare diagnosing of pelvic splenosis in the evaluating pelvic mass with the tissue evidence instead of surgery. |
---|