Cargando…
Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling
Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2 (c-IAP1/2) play central roles in signal transduction mediated by numerous receptors that participate in inflammatory and immune responses. In certain pathways, such as activation of NF-κB, their degradation is a major regulatory event and is physiolog...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.3 |
_version_ | 1782384858788528128 |
---|---|
author | Kocab, Andrew J. Veloso, Artur Paulsen, Michelle T. Ljungman, Mats Duckett, Colin S. |
author_facet | Kocab, Andrew J. Veloso, Artur Paulsen, Michelle T. Ljungman, Mats Duckett, Colin S. |
author_sort | Kocab, Andrew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2 (c-IAP1/2) play central roles in signal transduction mediated by numerous receptors that participate in inflammatory and immune responses. In certain pathways, such as activation of NF-κB, their degradation is a major regulatory event and is physiologically induced by activation of receptors. Additionally, a number of synthetic compounds have been developed that also target the c-IAPs and induce their degradation. However, the extent of a synthetic IAP antagonist's ability to mirror the transcriptional program by a physiological signal remains unclear. Here we take a systems approach to compare the transcriptional programs triggered by activation of CD30, a well-characterized receptor previously shown to induce the degradation of the c-IAPs, to SM-164, a synthetic IAP antagonist that specifically triggers c-IAP degradation. Employing a technique that allows the specific analysis of newly transcribed RNA, we have generated comparative transcriptome profiles for CD30 activation and SM-164 treatment. Analysis of these profiles revealed that the genes regulated by each stimulus were not completely shared, indicating novel functions of IAP antagonists and consequences of c-IAP1/2 degradation. The data identified a role for c-IAP1/2 in the regulation of the ribosome and protein synthesis, which was subsequently confirmed by biological assays. These findings expand our knowledge of the roles of c-IAP1/2 in signaling and provide insight into the mechanism of synthetic IAP antagonists, furthering our understanding of their therapeutic potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4530109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45301092016-04-01 Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling Kocab, Andrew J. Veloso, Artur Paulsen, Michelle T. Ljungman, Mats Duckett, Colin S. Oncogene Article Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2 (c-IAP1/2) play central roles in signal transduction mediated by numerous receptors that participate in inflammatory and immune responses. In certain pathways, such as activation of NF-κB, their degradation is a major regulatory event and is physiologically induced by activation of receptors. Additionally, a number of synthetic compounds have been developed that also target the c-IAPs and induce their degradation. However, the extent of a synthetic IAP antagonist's ability to mirror the transcriptional program by a physiological signal remains unclear. Here we take a systems approach to compare the transcriptional programs triggered by activation of CD30, a well-characterized receptor previously shown to induce the degradation of the c-IAPs, to SM-164, a synthetic IAP antagonist that specifically triggers c-IAP degradation. Employing a technique that allows the specific analysis of newly transcribed RNA, we have generated comparative transcriptome profiles for CD30 activation and SM-164 treatment. Analysis of these profiles revealed that the genes regulated by each stimulus were not completely shared, indicating novel functions of IAP antagonists and consequences of c-IAP1/2 degradation. The data identified a role for c-IAP1/2 in the regulation of the ribosome and protein synthesis, which was subsequently confirmed by biological assays. These findings expand our knowledge of the roles of c-IAP1/2 in signaling and provide insight into the mechanism of synthetic IAP antagonists, furthering our understanding of their therapeutic potential. 2015-02-09 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4530109/ /pubmed/25659587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.3 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Kocab, Andrew J. Veloso, Artur Paulsen, Michelle T. Ljungman, Mats Duckett, Colin S. Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling |
title | Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling |
title_full | Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling |
title_fullStr | Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling |
title_short | Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling |
title_sort | effects of physiological and synthetic iap antagonism on c-iap-dependent signaling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocabandrewj effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling AT velosoartur effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling AT paulsenmichellet effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling AT ljungmanmats effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling AT duckettcolins effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling |