Cargando…

Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling

Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2 (c-IAP1/2) play central roles in signal transduction mediated by numerous receptors that participate in inflammatory and immune responses. In certain pathways, such as activation of NF-κB, their degradation is a major regulatory event and is physiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kocab, Andrew J., Veloso, Artur, Paulsen, Michelle T., Ljungman, Mats, Duckett, Colin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.3
_version_ 1782384858788528128
author Kocab, Andrew J.
Veloso, Artur
Paulsen, Michelle T.
Ljungman, Mats
Duckett, Colin S.
author_facet Kocab, Andrew J.
Veloso, Artur
Paulsen, Michelle T.
Ljungman, Mats
Duckett, Colin S.
author_sort Kocab, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2 (c-IAP1/2) play central roles in signal transduction mediated by numerous receptors that participate in inflammatory and immune responses. In certain pathways, such as activation of NF-κB, their degradation is a major regulatory event and is physiologically induced by activation of receptors. Additionally, a number of synthetic compounds have been developed that also target the c-IAPs and induce their degradation. However, the extent of a synthetic IAP antagonist's ability to mirror the transcriptional program by a physiological signal remains unclear. Here we take a systems approach to compare the transcriptional programs triggered by activation of CD30, a well-characterized receptor previously shown to induce the degradation of the c-IAPs, to SM-164, a synthetic IAP antagonist that specifically triggers c-IAP degradation. Employing a technique that allows the specific analysis of newly transcribed RNA, we have generated comparative transcriptome profiles for CD30 activation and SM-164 treatment. Analysis of these profiles revealed that the genes regulated by each stimulus were not completely shared, indicating novel functions of IAP antagonists and consequences of c-IAP1/2 degradation. The data identified a role for c-IAP1/2 in the regulation of the ribosome and protein synthesis, which was subsequently confirmed by biological assays. These findings expand our knowledge of the roles of c-IAP1/2 in signaling and provide insight into the mechanism of synthetic IAP antagonists, furthering our understanding of their therapeutic potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4530109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45301092016-04-01 Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling Kocab, Andrew J. Veloso, Artur Paulsen, Michelle T. Ljungman, Mats Duckett, Colin S. Oncogene Article Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2 (c-IAP1/2) play central roles in signal transduction mediated by numerous receptors that participate in inflammatory and immune responses. In certain pathways, such as activation of NF-κB, their degradation is a major regulatory event and is physiologically induced by activation of receptors. Additionally, a number of synthetic compounds have been developed that also target the c-IAPs and induce their degradation. However, the extent of a synthetic IAP antagonist's ability to mirror the transcriptional program by a physiological signal remains unclear. Here we take a systems approach to compare the transcriptional programs triggered by activation of CD30, a well-characterized receptor previously shown to induce the degradation of the c-IAPs, to SM-164, a synthetic IAP antagonist that specifically triggers c-IAP degradation. Employing a technique that allows the specific analysis of newly transcribed RNA, we have generated comparative transcriptome profiles for CD30 activation and SM-164 treatment. Analysis of these profiles revealed that the genes regulated by each stimulus were not completely shared, indicating novel functions of IAP antagonists and consequences of c-IAP1/2 degradation. The data identified a role for c-IAP1/2 in the regulation of the ribosome and protein synthesis, which was subsequently confirmed by biological assays. These findings expand our knowledge of the roles of c-IAP1/2 in signaling and provide insight into the mechanism of synthetic IAP antagonists, furthering our understanding of their therapeutic potential. 2015-02-09 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4530109/ /pubmed/25659587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.3 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Kocab, Andrew J.
Veloso, Artur
Paulsen, Michelle T.
Ljungman, Mats
Duckett, Colin S.
Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling
title Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling
title_full Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling
title_fullStr Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling
title_short Effects of Physiological and Synthetic IAP Antagonism on c-IAP-Dependent Signaling
title_sort effects of physiological and synthetic iap antagonism on c-iap-dependent signaling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.3
work_keys_str_mv AT kocabandrewj effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling
AT velosoartur effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling
AT paulsenmichellet effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling
AT ljungmanmats effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling
AT duckettcolins effectsofphysiologicalandsyntheticiapantagonismonciapdependentsignaling