Cargando…
Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance
Induction of donor-specific tolerance is still considered as the “Holy Grail” in transplantation medicine. The mixed chimerism approach is virtually the only tolerance approach that was successfully translated into the clinical setting. We have previously reported successful induction of chimerism a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26273682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/562935 |
_version_ | 1782384890023510016 |
---|---|
author | Pilat, Nina Klaus, Christoph Hock, Karin Baranyi, Ulrike Unger, Lukas Mahr, Benedikt Farkas, Andreas M. Wrba, Fritz Wekerle, Thomas |
author_facet | Pilat, Nina Klaus, Christoph Hock, Karin Baranyi, Ulrike Unger, Lukas Mahr, Benedikt Farkas, Andreas M. Wrba, Fritz Wekerle, Thomas |
author_sort | Pilat, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Induction of donor-specific tolerance is still considered as the “Holy Grail” in transplantation medicine. The mixed chimerism approach is virtually the only tolerance approach that was successfully translated into the clinical setting. We have previously reported successful induction of chimerism and tolerance using cell therapy with recipient T regulatory cells (Tregs) to avoid cytotoxic recipient treatment. Treg therapy is limited by the availability of cells as large-scale expansion is time-consuming and associated with the risk of contamination with effector cells. Using a costimulation-blockade based bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) model with Treg therapy instead of cytoreductive recipient treatment we aimed to determine the most potent Treg population for clinical translation. Here we show that CD4(+)CD25(+) in vitro activated nTregs are superior to TGFβ induced iTregs in promoting the induction of chimerism and tolerance. Therapy with nTregs (but not iTregs) led to multilineage chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in mice receiving as few as 0.5 × 10(6) cells. Moreover, we show that only recipient Tregs, but not donor or third-party Tregs, had a beneficial effect on BM engraftment at the tested doses. Thus, recipient-type nTregs significantly improve chimerism and tolerance and might be the most potent Treg population for translation into the clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4530277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45302772015-08-13 Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance Pilat, Nina Klaus, Christoph Hock, Karin Baranyi, Ulrike Unger, Lukas Mahr, Benedikt Farkas, Andreas M. Wrba, Fritz Wekerle, Thomas J Immunol Res Research Article Induction of donor-specific tolerance is still considered as the “Holy Grail” in transplantation medicine. The mixed chimerism approach is virtually the only tolerance approach that was successfully translated into the clinical setting. We have previously reported successful induction of chimerism and tolerance using cell therapy with recipient T regulatory cells (Tregs) to avoid cytotoxic recipient treatment. Treg therapy is limited by the availability of cells as large-scale expansion is time-consuming and associated with the risk of contamination with effector cells. Using a costimulation-blockade based bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) model with Treg therapy instead of cytoreductive recipient treatment we aimed to determine the most potent Treg population for clinical translation. Here we show that CD4(+)CD25(+) in vitro activated nTregs are superior to TGFβ induced iTregs in promoting the induction of chimerism and tolerance. Therapy with nTregs (but not iTregs) led to multilineage chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in mice receiving as few as 0.5 × 10(6) cells. Moreover, we show that only recipient Tregs, but not donor or third-party Tregs, had a beneficial effect on BM engraftment at the tested doses. Thus, recipient-type nTregs significantly improve chimerism and tolerance and might be the most potent Treg population for translation into the clinical setting. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4530277/ /pubmed/26273682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/562935 Text en Copyright © 2015 Nina Pilat et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pilat, Nina Klaus, Christoph Hock, Karin Baranyi, Ulrike Unger, Lukas Mahr, Benedikt Farkas, Andreas M. Wrba, Fritz Wekerle, Thomas Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance |
title | Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance |
title_full | Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance |
title_fullStr | Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance |
title_full_unstemmed | Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance |
title_short | Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance |
title_sort | polyclonal recipient ntregs are superior to donor or third-party tregs in the induction of transplantation tolerance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26273682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/562935 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pilatnina polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT klauschristoph polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT hockkarin polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT baranyiulrike polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT ungerlukas polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT mahrbenedikt polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT farkasandreasm polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT wrbafritz polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance AT wekerlethomas polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance |