Cargando…

Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance

Induction of donor-specific tolerance is still considered as the “Holy Grail” in transplantation medicine. The mixed chimerism approach is virtually the only tolerance approach that was successfully translated into the clinical setting. We have previously reported successful induction of chimerism a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilat, Nina, Klaus, Christoph, Hock, Karin, Baranyi, Ulrike, Unger, Lukas, Mahr, Benedikt, Farkas, Andreas M., Wrba, Fritz, Wekerle, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26273682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/562935
_version_ 1782384890023510016
author Pilat, Nina
Klaus, Christoph
Hock, Karin
Baranyi, Ulrike
Unger, Lukas
Mahr, Benedikt
Farkas, Andreas M.
Wrba, Fritz
Wekerle, Thomas
author_facet Pilat, Nina
Klaus, Christoph
Hock, Karin
Baranyi, Ulrike
Unger, Lukas
Mahr, Benedikt
Farkas, Andreas M.
Wrba, Fritz
Wekerle, Thomas
author_sort Pilat, Nina
collection PubMed
description Induction of donor-specific tolerance is still considered as the “Holy Grail” in transplantation medicine. The mixed chimerism approach is virtually the only tolerance approach that was successfully translated into the clinical setting. We have previously reported successful induction of chimerism and tolerance using cell therapy with recipient T regulatory cells (Tregs) to avoid cytotoxic recipient treatment. Treg therapy is limited by the availability of cells as large-scale expansion is time-consuming and associated with the risk of contamination with effector cells. Using a costimulation-blockade based bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) model with Treg therapy instead of cytoreductive recipient treatment we aimed to determine the most potent Treg population for clinical translation. Here we show that CD4(+)CD25(+) in vitro activated nTregs are superior to TGFβ induced iTregs in promoting the induction of chimerism and tolerance. Therapy with nTregs (but not iTregs) led to multilineage chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in mice receiving as few as 0.5 × 10(6) cells. Moreover, we show that only recipient Tregs, but not donor or third-party Tregs, had a beneficial effect on BM engraftment at the tested doses. Thus, recipient-type nTregs significantly improve chimerism and tolerance and might be the most potent Treg population for translation into the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4530277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45302772015-08-13 Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance Pilat, Nina Klaus, Christoph Hock, Karin Baranyi, Ulrike Unger, Lukas Mahr, Benedikt Farkas, Andreas M. Wrba, Fritz Wekerle, Thomas J Immunol Res Research Article Induction of donor-specific tolerance is still considered as the “Holy Grail” in transplantation medicine. The mixed chimerism approach is virtually the only tolerance approach that was successfully translated into the clinical setting. We have previously reported successful induction of chimerism and tolerance using cell therapy with recipient T regulatory cells (Tregs) to avoid cytotoxic recipient treatment. Treg therapy is limited by the availability of cells as large-scale expansion is time-consuming and associated with the risk of contamination with effector cells. Using a costimulation-blockade based bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) model with Treg therapy instead of cytoreductive recipient treatment we aimed to determine the most potent Treg population for clinical translation. Here we show that CD4(+)CD25(+) in vitro activated nTregs are superior to TGFβ induced iTregs in promoting the induction of chimerism and tolerance. Therapy with nTregs (but not iTregs) led to multilineage chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in mice receiving as few as 0.5 × 10(6) cells. Moreover, we show that only recipient Tregs, but not donor or third-party Tregs, had a beneficial effect on BM engraftment at the tested doses. Thus, recipient-type nTregs significantly improve chimerism and tolerance and might be the most potent Treg population for translation into the clinical setting. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4530277/ /pubmed/26273682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/562935 Text en Copyright © 2015 Nina Pilat et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pilat, Nina
Klaus, Christoph
Hock, Karin
Baranyi, Ulrike
Unger, Lukas
Mahr, Benedikt
Farkas, Andreas M.
Wrba, Fritz
Wekerle, Thomas
Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance
title Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance
title_full Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance
title_fullStr Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance
title_full_unstemmed Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance
title_short Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance
title_sort polyclonal recipient ntregs are superior to donor or third-party tregs in the induction of transplantation tolerance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26273682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/562935
work_keys_str_mv AT pilatnina polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT klauschristoph polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT hockkarin polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT baranyiulrike polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT ungerlukas polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT mahrbenedikt polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT farkasandreasm polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT wrbafritz polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance
AT wekerlethomas polyclonalrecipientntregsaresuperiortodonororthirdpartytregsintheinductionoftransplantationtolerance