Cargando…

4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement

Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyverfeldt, Petter, Bissell, Malenka, Barker, Alex J., Bolger, Ann F., Carlhäll, Carl-Johan, Ebbers, Tino, Francios, Christopher J., Frydrychowicz, Alex, Geiger, Julia, Giese, Daniel, Hope, Michael D., Kilner, Philip J., Kozerke, Sebastian, Myerson, Saul, Neubauer, Stefan, Wieben, Oliver, Markl, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5
_version_ 1782384910190772224
author Dyverfeldt, Petter
Bissell, Malenka
Barker, Alex J.
Bolger, Ann F.
Carlhäll, Carl-Johan
Ebbers, Tino
Francios, Christopher J.
Frydrychowicz, Alex
Geiger, Julia
Giese, Daniel
Hope, Michael D.
Kilner, Philip J.
Kozerke, Sebastian
Myerson, Saul
Neubauer, Stefan
Wieben, Oliver
Markl, Michael
author_facet Dyverfeldt, Petter
Bissell, Malenka
Barker, Alex J.
Bolger, Ann F.
Carlhäll, Carl-Johan
Ebbers, Tino
Francios, Christopher J.
Frydrychowicz, Alex
Geiger, Julia
Giese, Daniel
Hope, Michael D.
Kilner, Philip J.
Kozerke, Sebastian
Myerson, Saul
Neubauer, Stefan
Wieben, Oliver
Markl, Michael
author_sort Dyverfeldt, Petter
collection PubMed
description Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 – 3×3×3 mm(3), typical temporal resolution of 30–40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4530492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45304922015-09-10 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement Dyverfeldt, Petter Bissell, Malenka Barker, Alex J. Bolger, Ann F. Carlhäll, Carl-Johan Ebbers, Tino Francios, Christopher J. Frydrychowicz, Alex Geiger, Julia Giese, Daniel Hope, Michael D. Kilner, Philip J. Kozerke, Sebastian Myerson, Saul Neubauer, Stefan Wieben, Oliver Markl, Michael J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Review Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 – 3×3×3 mm(3), typical temporal resolution of 30–40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations. BioMed Central 2015-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4530492/ /pubmed/26257141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5 Text en © Dyverfeldt et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Dyverfeldt, Petter
Bissell, Malenka
Barker, Alex J.
Bolger, Ann F.
Carlhäll, Carl-Johan
Ebbers, Tino
Francios, Christopher J.
Frydrychowicz, Alex
Geiger, Julia
Giese, Daniel
Hope, Michael D.
Kilner, Philip J.
Kozerke, Sebastian
Myerson, Saul
Neubauer, Stefan
Wieben, Oliver
Markl, Michael
4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
title 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
title_full 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
title_fullStr 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
title_full_unstemmed 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
title_short 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
title_sort 4d flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dyverfeldtpetter 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT bissellmalenka 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT barkeralexj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT bolgerannf 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT carlhallcarljohan 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT ebberstino 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT francioschristopherj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT frydrychowiczalex 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT geigerjulia 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT giesedaniel 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT hopemichaeld 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT kilnerphilipj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT kozerkesebastian 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT myersonsaul 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT neubauerstefan 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT wiebenoliver 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement
AT marklmichael 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement