Cargando…
4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5 |
_version_ | 1782384910190772224 |
---|---|
author | Dyverfeldt, Petter Bissell, Malenka Barker, Alex J. Bolger, Ann F. Carlhäll, Carl-Johan Ebbers, Tino Francios, Christopher J. Frydrychowicz, Alex Geiger, Julia Giese, Daniel Hope, Michael D. Kilner, Philip J. Kozerke, Sebastian Myerson, Saul Neubauer, Stefan Wieben, Oliver Markl, Michael |
author_facet | Dyverfeldt, Petter Bissell, Malenka Barker, Alex J. Bolger, Ann F. Carlhäll, Carl-Johan Ebbers, Tino Francios, Christopher J. Frydrychowicz, Alex Geiger, Julia Giese, Daniel Hope, Michael D. Kilner, Philip J. Kozerke, Sebastian Myerson, Saul Neubauer, Stefan Wieben, Oliver Markl, Michael |
author_sort | Dyverfeldt, Petter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 – 3×3×3 mm(3), typical temporal resolution of 30–40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4530492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45304922015-09-10 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement Dyverfeldt, Petter Bissell, Malenka Barker, Alex J. Bolger, Ann F. Carlhäll, Carl-Johan Ebbers, Tino Francios, Christopher J. Frydrychowicz, Alex Geiger, Julia Giese, Daniel Hope, Michael D. Kilner, Philip J. Kozerke, Sebastian Myerson, Saul Neubauer, Stefan Wieben, Oliver Markl, Michael J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Review Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 – 3×3×3 mm(3), typical temporal resolution of 30–40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations. BioMed Central 2015-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4530492/ /pubmed/26257141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5 Text en © Dyverfeldt et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Dyverfeldt, Petter Bissell, Malenka Barker, Alex J. Bolger, Ann F. Carlhäll, Carl-Johan Ebbers, Tino Francios, Christopher J. Frydrychowicz, Alex Geiger, Julia Giese, Daniel Hope, Michael D. Kilner, Philip J. Kozerke, Sebastian Myerson, Saul Neubauer, Stefan Wieben, Oliver Markl, Michael 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement |
title | 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement |
title_full | 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement |
title_fullStr | 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement |
title_full_unstemmed | 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement |
title_short | 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement |
title_sort | 4d flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dyverfeldtpetter 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT bissellmalenka 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT barkeralexj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT bolgerannf 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT carlhallcarljohan 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT ebberstino 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT francioschristopherj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT frydrychowiczalex 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT geigerjulia 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT giesedaniel 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT hopemichaeld 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT kilnerphilipj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT kozerkesebastian 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT myersonsaul 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT neubauerstefan 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT wiebenoliver 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement AT marklmichael 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement |