Cargando…
Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
People sometimes fail to notice salient unexpected objects when their attention is otherwise occupied, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness. To explore individual differences in inattentional blindness, we employed both static and dynamic tasks that either presented the unexpected object aw...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134675 |
_version_ | 1782384962371059712 |
---|---|
author | Kreitz, Carina Furley, Philip Memmert, Daniel Simons, Daniel J. |
author_facet | Kreitz, Carina Furley, Philip Memmert, Daniel Simons, Daniel J. |
author_sort | Kreitz, Carina |
collection | PubMed |
description | People sometimes fail to notice salient unexpected objects when their attention is otherwise occupied, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness. To explore individual differences in inattentional blindness, we employed both static and dynamic tasks that either presented the unexpected object away from the focus of attention (spatial) or near the focus of attention (central). We hypothesized that noticing in central tasks might be driven by the availability of cognitive resources like working memory, and that noticing in spatial tasks might be driven by the limits on spatial attention like attention breadth. However, none of the cognitive measures predicted noticing in the dynamic central task or in either the static or dynamic spatial task. Only in the central static task did working memory capacity predict noticing, and that relationship was fairly weak. Furthermore, whether or not participants noticed an unexpected object in a static task was only weakly associated with their odds of noticing an unexpected object in a dynamic task. Taken together, our results are largely consistent with the notion that noticing unexpected objects is driven more by stochastic processes common to all people than by stable individual differences in cognitive abilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4530948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45309482015-08-24 Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities Kreitz, Carina Furley, Philip Memmert, Daniel Simons, Daniel J. PLoS One Research Article People sometimes fail to notice salient unexpected objects when their attention is otherwise occupied, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness. To explore individual differences in inattentional blindness, we employed both static and dynamic tasks that either presented the unexpected object away from the focus of attention (spatial) or near the focus of attention (central). We hypothesized that noticing in central tasks might be driven by the availability of cognitive resources like working memory, and that noticing in spatial tasks might be driven by the limits on spatial attention like attention breadth. However, none of the cognitive measures predicted noticing in the dynamic central task or in either the static or dynamic spatial task. Only in the central static task did working memory capacity predict noticing, and that relationship was fairly weak. Furthermore, whether or not participants noticed an unexpected object in a static task was only weakly associated with their odds of noticing an unexpected object in a dynamic task. Taken together, our results are largely consistent with the notion that noticing unexpected objects is driven more by stochastic processes common to all people than by stable individual differences in cognitive abilities. Public Library of Science 2015-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4530948/ /pubmed/26258545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134675 Text en © 2015 Kreitz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kreitz, Carina Furley, Philip Memmert, Daniel Simons, Daniel J. Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities |
title | Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities |
title_full | Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities |
title_fullStr | Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities |
title_full_unstemmed | Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities |
title_short | Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities |
title_sort | inattentional blindness and individual differences in cognitive abilities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kreitzcarina inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities AT furleyphilip inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities AT memmertdaniel inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities AT simonsdanielj inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities |