Cargando…

Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities

People sometimes fail to notice salient unexpected objects when their attention is otherwise occupied, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness. To explore individual differences in inattentional blindness, we employed both static and dynamic tasks that either presented the unexpected object aw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kreitz, Carina, Furley, Philip, Memmert, Daniel, Simons, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134675
_version_ 1782384962371059712
author Kreitz, Carina
Furley, Philip
Memmert, Daniel
Simons, Daniel J.
author_facet Kreitz, Carina
Furley, Philip
Memmert, Daniel
Simons, Daniel J.
author_sort Kreitz, Carina
collection PubMed
description People sometimes fail to notice salient unexpected objects when their attention is otherwise occupied, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness. To explore individual differences in inattentional blindness, we employed both static and dynamic tasks that either presented the unexpected object away from the focus of attention (spatial) or near the focus of attention (central). We hypothesized that noticing in central tasks might be driven by the availability of cognitive resources like working memory, and that noticing in spatial tasks might be driven by the limits on spatial attention like attention breadth. However, none of the cognitive measures predicted noticing in the dynamic central task or in either the static or dynamic spatial task. Only in the central static task did working memory capacity predict noticing, and that relationship was fairly weak. Furthermore, whether or not participants noticed an unexpected object in a static task was only weakly associated with their odds of noticing an unexpected object in a dynamic task. Taken together, our results are largely consistent with the notion that noticing unexpected objects is driven more by stochastic processes common to all people than by stable individual differences in cognitive abilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4530948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45309482015-08-24 Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities Kreitz, Carina Furley, Philip Memmert, Daniel Simons, Daniel J. PLoS One Research Article People sometimes fail to notice salient unexpected objects when their attention is otherwise occupied, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness. To explore individual differences in inattentional blindness, we employed both static and dynamic tasks that either presented the unexpected object away from the focus of attention (spatial) or near the focus of attention (central). We hypothesized that noticing in central tasks might be driven by the availability of cognitive resources like working memory, and that noticing in spatial tasks might be driven by the limits on spatial attention like attention breadth. However, none of the cognitive measures predicted noticing in the dynamic central task or in either the static or dynamic spatial task. Only in the central static task did working memory capacity predict noticing, and that relationship was fairly weak. Furthermore, whether or not participants noticed an unexpected object in a static task was only weakly associated with their odds of noticing an unexpected object in a dynamic task. Taken together, our results are largely consistent with the notion that noticing unexpected objects is driven more by stochastic processes common to all people than by stable individual differences in cognitive abilities. Public Library of Science 2015-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4530948/ /pubmed/26258545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134675 Text en © 2015 Kreitz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kreitz, Carina
Furley, Philip
Memmert, Daniel
Simons, Daniel J.
Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
title Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
title_full Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
title_fullStr Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
title_full_unstemmed Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
title_short Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
title_sort inattentional blindness and individual differences in cognitive abilities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26258545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134675
work_keys_str_mv AT kreitzcarina inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities
AT furleyphilip inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities
AT memmertdaniel inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities
AT simonsdanielj inattentionalblindnessandindividualdifferencesincognitiveabilities