Cargando…

Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

Modest dietary restriction extends lifespan (LS) in a diverse range of taxa and typically has a larger effect in females than males. Traditionally, this has been attributed to a stronger trade-off between LS and reproduction in females than in males that is mediated by the intake of calories. Recent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Kim, McClure, Colin, Priest, Nicholas K, Hunt, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25808180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12333
_version_ 1782384983370891264
author Jensen, Kim
McClure, Colin
Priest, Nicholas K
Hunt, John
author_facet Jensen, Kim
McClure, Colin
Priest, Nicholas K
Hunt, John
author_sort Jensen, Kim
collection PubMed
description Modest dietary restriction extends lifespan (LS) in a diverse range of taxa and typically has a larger effect in females than males. Traditionally, this has been attributed to a stronger trade-off between LS and reproduction in females than in males that is mediated by the intake of calories. Recent studies, however, suggest that it is the intake of specific nutrients that extends LS and mediates this trade-off. Here, we used the geometric framework (GF) to examine the sex-specific effects of protein (P) and carbohydrate (C) intake on LS and reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that LS was maximized at a high intake of C and a low intake of P in both sexes, whereas nutrient intake had divergent effects on reproduction. Male offspring production rate and LS were maximized at the same intake of nutrients, whereas female egg production rate was maximized at a high intake of diets with a P:C ratio of 1:2. This resulted in larger differences in nutrient-dependent optima for LS and reproduction in females than in males, as well as an optimal intake of nutrients for lifetime reproduction that differed between the sexes. Under dietary choice, the sexes followed similar feeding trajectories regulated around a P:C ratio of 1:4. Consequently, neither sex reached their nutritional optimum for lifetime reproduction, suggesting intralocus sexual conflict over nutrient optimization. Our study shows clear sex differences in the nutritional requirements of reproduction in D. melanogaster and joins the growing list of studies challenging the role of caloric restriction in extending LS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4531074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45310742015-08-13 Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster Jensen, Kim McClure, Colin Priest, Nicholas K Hunt, John Aging Cell Original Articles Modest dietary restriction extends lifespan (LS) in a diverse range of taxa and typically has a larger effect in females than males. Traditionally, this has been attributed to a stronger trade-off between LS and reproduction in females than in males that is mediated by the intake of calories. Recent studies, however, suggest that it is the intake of specific nutrients that extends LS and mediates this trade-off. Here, we used the geometric framework (GF) to examine the sex-specific effects of protein (P) and carbohydrate (C) intake on LS and reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that LS was maximized at a high intake of C and a low intake of P in both sexes, whereas nutrient intake had divergent effects on reproduction. Male offspring production rate and LS were maximized at the same intake of nutrients, whereas female egg production rate was maximized at a high intake of diets with a P:C ratio of 1:2. This resulted in larger differences in nutrient-dependent optima for LS and reproduction in females than in males, as well as an optimal intake of nutrients for lifetime reproduction that differed between the sexes. Under dietary choice, the sexes followed similar feeding trajectories regulated around a P:C ratio of 1:4. Consequently, neither sex reached their nutritional optimum for lifetime reproduction, suggesting intralocus sexual conflict over nutrient optimization. Our study shows clear sex differences in the nutritional requirements of reproduction in D. melanogaster and joins the growing list of studies challenging the role of caloric restriction in extending LS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-08 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4531074/ /pubmed/25808180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12333 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Aging Cell published by the Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jensen, Kim
McClure, Colin
Priest, Nicholas K
Hunt, John
Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
title Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
title_fullStr Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
title_short Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
title_sort sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in drosophila melanogaster
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25808180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12333
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenkim sexspecificeffectsofproteinandcarbohydrateintakeonreproductionbutnotlifespanindrosophilamelanogaster
AT mcclurecolin sexspecificeffectsofproteinandcarbohydrateintakeonreproductionbutnotlifespanindrosophilamelanogaster
AT priestnicholask sexspecificeffectsofproteinandcarbohydrateintakeonreproductionbutnotlifespanindrosophilamelanogaster
AT huntjohn sexspecificeffectsofproteinandcarbohydrateintakeonreproductionbutnotlifespanindrosophilamelanogaster