Cargando…
Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task
Executive control of attention refers to processes that detect and resolve conflict among competing thoughts and actions. Despite the high-level nature of this faculty, the role of awareness in executive control of attention is not well understood. In this study, we used interocular suppression to m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01110 |
_version_ | 1782385011846021120 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Qiong Lo Voi, Jonathan T. H. Lee, Thomas Y. Mackie, Melissa-Ann Wu, Yanhong Fan, Jin |
author_facet | Wu, Qiong Lo Voi, Jonathan T. H. Lee, Thomas Y. Mackie, Melissa-Ann Wu, Yanhong Fan, Jin |
author_sort | Wu, Qiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Executive control of attention refers to processes that detect and resolve conflict among competing thoughts and actions. Despite the high-level nature of this faculty, the role of awareness in executive control of attention is not well understood. In this study, we used interocular suppression to mask the flankers in an arrow flanker task, in which the flankers and the target arrow were presented simultaneously in order to elicit executive control of attention. Participants were unable to detect the flanker arrows or to reliably identify their direction when masked. There was a typical conflict effect (prolonged reaction time and increased error rate under flanker-target incongruent condition compared to congruent condition) when the flanker arrows were unmasked, while the conflict effect was absent when the flanker arrows were masked with interocular suppression. These results suggest that blocking awareness of competing stimuli with interocular suppression prevents the involvement of executive control of attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4531229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45312292015-08-28 Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task Wu, Qiong Lo Voi, Jonathan T. H. Lee, Thomas Y. Mackie, Melissa-Ann Wu, Yanhong Fan, Jin Front Psychol Psychology Executive control of attention refers to processes that detect and resolve conflict among competing thoughts and actions. Despite the high-level nature of this faculty, the role of awareness in executive control of attention is not well understood. In this study, we used interocular suppression to mask the flankers in an arrow flanker task, in which the flankers and the target arrow were presented simultaneously in order to elicit executive control of attention. Participants were unable to detect the flanker arrows or to reliably identify their direction when masked. There was a typical conflict effect (prolonged reaction time and increased error rate under flanker-target incongruent condition compared to congruent condition) when the flanker arrows were unmasked, while the conflict effect was absent when the flanker arrows were masked with interocular suppression. These results suggest that blocking awareness of competing stimuli with interocular suppression prevents the involvement of executive control of attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4531229/ /pubmed/26321969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01110 Text en Copyright © 2015 Fan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Wu, Qiong Lo Voi, Jonathan T. H. Lee, Thomas Y. Mackie, Melissa-Ann Wu, Yanhong Fan, Jin Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task |
title | Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task |
title_full | Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task |
title_fullStr | Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task |
title_full_unstemmed | Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task |
title_short | Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task |
title_sort | interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuqiong interocularsuppressionpreventsinterferenceinaflankertask AT lovoijonathanth interocularsuppressionpreventsinterferenceinaflankertask AT leethomasy interocularsuppressionpreventsinterferenceinaflankertask AT mackiemelissaann interocularsuppressionpreventsinterferenceinaflankertask AT wuyanhong interocularsuppressionpreventsinterferenceinaflankertask AT fanjin interocularsuppressionpreventsinterferenceinaflankertask |