Cargando…

Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control

Response time (RT) is an oft-reported behavioral measure in psychological and neurocognitive experiments, but the high level of observed trial-to-trial variability in this measure has often limited its usefulness. Here, we combine computational modeling and psychophysics to examine the hypothesis th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Ning, Yu, Angela J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01046
_version_ 1782385014092070912
author Ma, Ning
Yu, Angela J.
author_facet Ma, Ning
Yu, Angela J.
author_sort Ma, Ning
collection PubMed
description Response time (RT) is an oft-reported behavioral measure in psychological and neurocognitive experiments, but the high level of observed trial-to-trial variability in this measure has often limited its usefulness. Here, we combine computational modeling and psychophysics to examine the hypothesis that fluctuations in this noisy measure reflect dynamic computations in human statistical learning and corresponding cognitive adjustments. We present data from the stop-signal task (SST), in which subjects respond to a go stimulus on each trial, unless instructed not to by a subsequent, infrequently presented stop signal. We model across-trial learning of stop signal frequency, P(stop), and stop-signal onset time, SSD (stop-signal delay), with a Bayesian hidden Markov model, and within-trial decision-making with an optimal stochastic control model. The combined model predicts that RT should increase with both expected P(stop) and SSD. The human behavioral data (n = 20) bear out this prediction, showing P(stop) and SSD both to be significant, independent predictors of RT, with P(stop) being a more prominent predictor in 75% of the subjects, and SSD being more prominent in the remaining 25%. The results demonstrate that humans indeed readily internalize environmental statistics and adjust their cognitive/behavioral strategy accordingly, and that subtle patterns in RT variability can serve as a valuable tool for validating models of statistical learning and decision-making. More broadly, the modeling tools presented in this work can be generalized to a large body of behavioral paradigms, in order to extract insights about cognitive and neural processing from apparently quite noisy behavioral measures. We also discuss how this behaviorally validated model can then be used to conduct model-based analysis of neural data, in order to help identify specific brain areas for representing and encoding key computational quantities in learning and decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4531239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45312392015-08-28 Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control Ma, Ning Yu, Angela J. Front Psychol Psychology Response time (RT) is an oft-reported behavioral measure in psychological and neurocognitive experiments, but the high level of observed trial-to-trial variability in this measure has often limited its usefulness. Here, we combine computational modeling and psychophysics to examine the hypothesis that fluctuations in this noisy measure reflect dynamic computations in human statistical learning and corresponding cognitive adjustments. We present data from the stop-signal task (SST), in which subjects respond to a go stimulus on each trial, unless instructed not to by a subsequent, infrequently presented stop signal. We model across-trial learning of stop signal frequency, P(stop), and stop-signal onset time, SSD (stop-signal delay), with a Bayesian hidden Markov model, and within-trial decision-making with an optimal stochastic control model. The combined model predicts that RT should increase with both expected P(stop) and SSD. The human behavioral data (n = 20) bear out this prediction, showing P(stop) and SSD both to be significant, independent predictors of RT, with P(stop) being a more prominent predictor in 75% of the subjects, and SSD being more prominent in the remaining 25%. The results demonstrate that humans indeed readily internalize environmental statistics and adjust their cognitive/behavioral strategy accordingly, and that subtle patterns in RT variability can serve as a valuable tool for validating models of statistical learning and decision-making. More broadly, the modeling tools presented in this work can be generalized to a large body of behavioral paradigms, in order to extract insights about cognitive and neural processing from apparently quite noisy behavioral measures. We also discuss how this behaviorally validated model can then be used to conduct model-based analysis of neural data, in order to help identify specific brain areas for representing and encoding key computational quantities in learning and decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4531239/ /pubmed/26321966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01046 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ma and Yu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ma, Ning
Yu, Angela J.
Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control
title Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control
title_full Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control
title_fullStr Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control
title_full_unstemmed Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control
title_short Statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control
title_sort statistical learning and adaptive decision-making underlie human response time variability in inhibitory control
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01046
work_keys_str_mv AT maning statisticallearningandadaptivedecisionmakingunderliehumanresponsetimevariabilityininhibitorycontrol
AT yuangelaj statisticallearningandadaptivedecisionmakingunderliehumanresponsetimevariabilityininhibitorycontrol