Cargando…

Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram

AIM: To investigate new signs on barium swallow that can differentiate primary from secondary achalasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 30 patients with primary achalasia and 17 patients with secondary achalasia were reviewed. Clinical, endoscopic, and manometric data was recorded. Barium esophag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Pankaj, Debi, Uma, Sinha, Saroj Kant, Prasad, Kaushal Kishor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288525
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.161465
_version_ 1782385039717171200
author Gupta, Pankaj
Debi, Uma
Sinha, Saroj Kant
Prasad, Kaushal Kishor
author_facet Gupta, Pankaj
Debi, Uma
Sinha, Saroj Kant
Prasad, Kaushal Kishor
author_sort Gupta, Pankaj
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate new signs on barium swallow that can differentiate primary from secondary achalasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 30 patients with primary achalasia and 17 patients with secondary achalasia were reviewed. Clinical, endoscopic, and manometric data was recorded. Barium esophagograms were evaluated for peristalsis and morphology of distal esophageal segment (length, symmetry, nodularity, shouldering, filling defects, and “tram-track sign”). RESULTS: Mean age at presentation was 39 years in primary achalasia and 49 years in secondary achalasia. The mean duration of symptoms was 3.5 years in primary achalasia and 3 months in secondary achalasia. False-negative endoscopic results were noted in the first instance in five patients. In the secondary achalasia group, five patients had distal esophageal segment morphology indistinguishable from that of primary achalasia. None of the patients with primary achalasia and 35% patients with secondary achalasia had a length of the distal segment approaching combined height of two vertebral bodies. None of the patients with secondary achalasia and 34% patients with primary achalasia had maximum caliber of esophagus approaching combined height of two vertebral bodies. Tertiary contractions were noted in 90% patients with primary achalasia and 24% patients with secondary achalasia. Tram-track sign was found in 55% patients with primary achalasia. Filling defects in the distal esophageal segment were noted in 94% patients with secondary achalasia. CONCLUSION: Length of distal esophageal segment, tertiary contractions, tram-track sign, and filling defects in distal esophageal segment are useful esophagographic features distinguishing primary from secondary achalasia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4531455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45314552015-08-18 Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram Gupta, Pankaj Debi, Uma Sinha, Saroj Kant Prasad, Kaushal Kishor Indian J Radiol Imaging Abdominal Radiology AIM: To investigate new signs on barium swallow that can differentiate primary from secondary achalasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 30 patients with primary achalasia and 17 patients with secondary achalasia were reviewed. Clinical, endoscopic, and manometric data was recorded. Barium esophagograms were evaluated for peristalsis and morphology of distal esophageal segment (length, symmetry, nodularity, shouldering, filling defects, and “tram-track sign”). RESULTS: Mean age at presentation was 39 years in primary achalasia and 49 years in secondary achalasia. The mean duration of symptoms was 3.5 years in primary achalasia and 3 months in secondary achalasia. False-negative endoscopic results were noted in the first instance in five patients. In the secondary achalasia group, five patients had distal esophageal segment morphology indistinguishable from that of primary achalasia. None of the patients with primary achalasia and 35% patients with secondary achalasia had a length of the distal segment approaching combined height of two vertebral bodies. None of the patients with secondary achalasia and 34% patients with primary achalasia had maximum caliber of esophagus approaching combined height of two vertebral bodies. Tertiary contractions were noted in 90% patients with primary achalasia and 24% patients with secondary achalasia. Tram-track sign was found in 55% patients with primary achalasia. Filling defects in the distal esophageal segment were noted in 94% patients with secondary achalasia. CONCLUSION: Length of distal esophageal segment, tertiary contractions, tram-track sign, and filling defects in distal esophageal segment are useful esophagographic features distinguishing primary from secondary achalasia. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4531455/ /pubmed/26288525 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.161465 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abdominal Radiology
Gupta, Pankaj
Debi, Uma
Sinha, Saroj Kant
Prasad, Kaushal Kishor
Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram
title Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram
title_full Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram
title_fullStr Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram
title_full_unstemmed Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram
title_short Primary versus secondary achalasia: New signs on barium esophagogram
title_sort primary versus secondary achalasia: new signs on barium esophagogram
topic Abdominal Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288525
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.161465
work_keys_str_mv AT guptapankaj primaryversussecondaryachalasianewsignsonbariumesophagogram
AT debiuma primaryversussecondaryachalasianewsignsonbariumesophagogram
AT sinhasarojkant primaryversussecondaryachalasianewsignsonbariumesophagogram
AT prasadkaushalkishor primaryversussecondaryachalasianewsignsonbariumesophagogram