Cargando…

HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention

BACKGROUND: Extending palliative care to those with advanced non-malignant disease is advocated, but the implications in specific conditions are poorly understood. AIMS: We piloted a novel nurse-led intervention, HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckingham, Susan, Kendall, Marilyn, Ferguson, Susie, MacNee, William, Sheikh, Aziz, White, Patrick, Worth, Allison, Boyd, Kirsty, Murray, Scott A, Pinnock, Hilary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.20
_version_ 1782385189256691712
author Buckingham, Susan
Kendall, Marilyn
Ferguson, Susie
MacNee, William
Sheikh, Aziz
White, Patrick
Worth, Allison
Boyd, Kirsty
Murray, Scott A
Pinnock, Hilary
author_facet Buckingham, Susan
Kendall, Marilyn
Ferguson, Susie
MacNee, William
Sheikh, Aziz
White, Patrick
Worth, Allison
Boyd, Kirsty
Murray, Scott A
Pinnock, Hilary
author_sort Buckingham, Susan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extending palliative care to those with advanced non-malignant disease is advocated, but the implications in specific conditions are poorly understood. AIMS: We piloted a novel nurse-led intervention, HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD), undertaken 4 weeks after discharge from hospital, which sought to identify and address the holistic care needs of people with severe COPD. METHODS: This 6-month mixed-method feasibility pilot trial randomised (ratio 3:1) patients to HELP-COPD or usual care. We assessed the feasibility of using validated questionnaires as outcome measures and analysed the needs/actions recorded in the HELP-COPD records. Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, carers and professionals explored the perceptions of HELP-COPD. Verbatim transcriptions and field notes were analysed using Normalisation Process Theory as a framework. RESULTS: We randomised 32 patients (24 to HELP-COPD); 19 completed the study (death=3, ill-health=4, declined=6). The HELP-COPD record noted a mean of 1.6 actions/assessment, mostly provision of information or self-help actions: only five referrals were made. Most patients were positive about HELP-COPD, discussing their concerns and coping strategies in all domains, but the questionnaires were burdensome for some patients. Adaptation to their slowly progressive disability and a strong preference to rely on family support was reflected in limited acceptance of formal services. Professionals perceived HELP-COPD as addressing an important aspect of care, although timing overlapped with discharge planning. CONCLUSIONS: The HELP-COPD intervention was well received by patients and the concept resonated with professionals, although delivery post discharge overlapped with existing services. Integration of brief holistic care assessments in the routine primary care management of COPD may be more appropriate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4532154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45321542015-09-15 HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention Buckingham, Susan Kendall, Marilyn Ferguson, Susie MacNee, William Sheikh, Aziz White, Patrick Worth, Allison Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott A Pinnock, Hilary NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article BACKGROUND: Extending palliative care to those with advanced non-malignant disease is advocated, but the implications in specific conditions are poorly understood. AIMS: We piloted a novel nurse-led intervention, HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD), undertaken 4 weeks after discharge from hospital, which sought to identify and address the holistic care needs of people with severe COPD. METHODS: This 6-month mixed-method feasibility pilot trial randomised (ratio 3:1) patients to HELP-COPD or usual care. We assessed the feasibility of using validated questionnaires as outcome measures and analysed the needs/actions recorded in the HELP-COPD records. Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, carers and professionals explored the perceptions of HELP-COPD. Verbatim transcriptions and field notes were analysed using Normalisation Process Theory as a framework. RESULTS: We randomised 32 patients (24 to HELP-COPD); 19 completed the study (death=3, ill-health=4, declined=6). The HELP-COPD record noted a mean of 1.6 actions/assessment, mostly provision of information or self-help actions: only five referrals were made. Most patients were positive about HELP-COPD, discussing their concerns and coping strategies in all domains, but the questionnaires were burdensome for some patients. Adaptation to their slowly progressive disability and a strong preference to rely on family support was reflected in limited acceptance of formal services. Professionals perceived HELP-COPD as addressing an important aspect of care, although timing overlapped with discharge planning. CONCLUSIONS: The HELP-COPD intervention was well received by patients and the concept resonated with professionals, although delivery post discharge overlapped with existing services. Integration of brief holistic care assessments in the routine primary care management of COPD may be more appropriate. Nature Publishing Group 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4532154/ /pubmed/26028347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.20 Text en Copyright © 2015 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Buckingham, Susan
Kendall, Marilyn
Ferguson, Susie
MacNee, William
Sheikh, Aziz
White, Patrick
Worth, Allison
Boyd, Kirsty
Murray, Scott A
Pinnock, Hilary
HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
title HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
title_full HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
title_fullStr HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
title_full_unstemmed HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
title_short HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
title_sort helping older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (help-copd): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.20
work_keys_str_mv AT buckinghamsusan helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT kendallmarilyn helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT fergusonsusie helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT macneewilliam helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT sheikhaziz helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT whitepatrick helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT worthallison helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT boydkirsty helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT murrayscotta helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention
AT pinnockhilary helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention