Cargando…
HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention
BACKGROUND: Extending palliative care to those with advanced non-malignant disease is advocated, but the implications in specific conditions are poorly understood. AIMS: We piloted a novel nurse-led intervention, HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.20 |
_version_ | 1782385189256691712 |
---|---|
author | Buckingham, Susan Kendall, Marilyn Ferguson, Susie MacNee, William Sheikh, Aziz White, Patrick Worth, Allison Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott A Pinnock, Hilary |
author_facet | Buckingham, Susan Kendall, Marilyn Ferguson, Susie MacNee, William Sheikh, Aziz White, Patrick Worth, Allison Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott A Pinnock, Hilary |
author_sort | Buckingham, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Extending palliative care to those with advanced non-malignant disease is advocated, but the implications in specific conditions are poorly understood. AIMS: We piloted a novel nurse-led intervention, HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD), undertaken 4 weeks after discharge from hospital, which sought to identify and address the holistic care needs of people with severe COPD. METHODS: This 6-month mixed-method feasibility pilot trial randomised (ratio 3:1) patients to HELP-COPD or usual care. We assessed the feasibility of using validated questionnaires as outcome measures and analysed the needs/actions recorded in the HELP-COPD records. Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, carers and professionals explored the perceptions of HELP-COPD. Verbatim transcriptions and field notes were analysed using Normalisation Process Theory as a framework. RESULTS: We randomised 32 patients (24 to HELP-COPD); 19 completed the study (death=3, ill-health=4, declined=6). The HELP-COPD record noted a mean of 1.6 actions/assessment, mostly provision of information or self-help actions: only five referrals were made. Most patients were positive about HELP-COPD, discussing their concerns and coping strategies in all domains, but the questionnaires were burdensome for some patients. Adaptation to their slowly progressive disability and a strong preference to rely on family support was reflected in limited acceptance of formal services. Professionals perceived HELP-COPD as addressing an important aspect of care, although timing overlapped with discharge planning. CONCLUSIONS: The HELP-COPD intervention was well received by patients and the concept resonated with professionals, although delivery post discharge overlapped with existing services. Integration of brief holistic care assessments in the routine primary care management of COPD may be more appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4532154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45321542015-09-15 HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention Buckingham, Susan Kendall, Marilyn Ferguson, Susie MacNee, William Sheikh, Aziz White, Patrick Worth, Allison Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott A Pinnock, Hilary NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article BACKGROUND: Extending palliative care to those with advanced non-malignant disease is advocated, but the implications in specific conditions are poorly understood. AIMS: We piloted a novel nurse-led intervention, HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD), undertaken 4 weeks after discharge from hospital, which sought to identify and address the holistic care needs of people with severe COPD. METHODS: This 6-month mixed-method feasibility pilot trial randomised (ratio 3:1) patients to HELP-COPD or usual care. We assessed the feasibility of using validated questionnaires as outcome measures and analysed the needs/actions recorded in the HELP-COPD records. Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, carers and professionals explored the perceptions of HELP-COPD. Verbatim transcriptions and field notes were analysed using Normalisation Process Theory as a framework. RESULTS: We randomised 32 patients (24 to HELP-COPD); 19 completed the study (death=3, ill-health=4, declined=6). The HELP-COPD record noted a mean of 1.6 actions/assessment, mostly provision of information or self-help actions: only five referrals were made. Most patients were positive about HELP-COPD, discussing their concerns and coping strategies in all domains, but the questionnaires were burdensome for some patients. Adaptation to their slowly progressive disability and a strong preference to rely on family support was reflected in limited acceptance of formal services. Professionals perceived HELP-COPD as addressing an important aspect of care, although timing overlapped with discharge planning. CONCLUSIONS: The HELP-COPD intervention was well received by patients and the concept resonated with professionals, although delivery post discharge overlapped with existing services. Integration of brief holistic care assessments in the routine primary care management of COPD may be more appropriate. Nature Publishing Group 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4532154/ /pubmed/26028347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.20 Text en Copyright © 2015 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Buckingham, Susan Kendall, Marilyn Ferguson, Susie MacNee, William Sheikh, Aziz White, Patrick Worth, Allison Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott A Pinnock, Hilary HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention |
title | HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention |
title_full | HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention |
title_fullStr | HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention |
title_short | HELPing older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HELP-COPD): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention |
title_sort | helping older people with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (help-copd): mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel intervention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buckinghamsusan helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT kendallmarilyn helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT fergusonsusie helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT macneewilliam helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT sheikhaziz helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT whitepatrick helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT worthallison helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT boydkirsty helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT murrayscotta helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention AT pinnockhilary helpingolderpeoplewithveryseverechronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasehelpcopdmixedmethodfeasibilitypilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialofanovelintervention |