Cargando…
On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults
The inversion of number words influences numerical cognition even in seemingly non-verbal tasks, such as Arabic number comparison. However, it is an open question whether inversion of decades and units also influences number processing beyond the two-digit number range. The current study addresses t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01216 |
_version_ | 1782385270608363520 |
---|---|
author | Bahnmueller, Julia Moeller, Korbinian Mann, Anne Nuerk, Hans-Christoph |
author_facet | Bahnmueller, Julia Moeller, Korbinian Mann, Anne Nuerk, Hans-Christoph |
author_sort | Bahnmueller, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The inversion of number words influences numerical cognition even in seemingly non-verbal tasks, such as Arabic number comparison. However, it is an open question whether inversion of decades and units also influences number processing beyond the two-digit number range. The current study addresses this question by investigating compatibility effects in both German- (a language with inverted) and English-speaking (a language with non-inverted number words) university students (mean age 22 years) in a three-digit number comparison task. We observed reliable hundred-decade as well as hundred-unit compatibility effects for three-digit number comparison. This indicates that, comparable two-digit numbers, three-digit numbers are processed in a parallel decomposed fashion. However, in contrast to previous results on two-digit numbers as well as on children’s processing of three-digit numbers, no reliable modulation of these compatibility effects through language was observed in adults. The present data indicate that inversion-related differences in multi-digit number processing are limited. They seem to be restricted to the number range involving those digits being inverted (i.e., tens and units in two-digit numbers) but do not generalize to neighboring digits. Possible reasons for this lack of generalization are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4532912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45329122015-08-28 On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults Bahnmueller, Julia Moeller, Korbinian Mann, Anne Nuerk, Hans-Christoph Front Psychol Psychology The inversion of number words influences numerical cognition even in seemingly non-verbal tasks, such as Arabic number comparison. However, it is an open question whether inversion of decades and units also influences number processing beyond the two-digit number range. The current study addresses this question by investigating compatibility effects in both German- (a language with inverted) and English-speaking (a language with non-inverted number words) university students (mean age 22 years) in a three-digit number comparison task. We observed reliable hundred-decade as well as hundred-unit compatibility effects for three-digit number comparison. This indicates that, comparable two-digit numbers, three-digit numbers are processed in a parallel decomposed fashion. However, in contrast to previous results on two-digit numbers as well as on children’s processing of three-digit numbers, no reliable modulation of these compatibility effects through language was observed in adults. The present data indicate that inversion-related differences in multi-digit number processing are limited. They seem to be restricted to the number range involving those digits being inverted (i.e., tens and units in two-digit numbers) but do not generalize to neighboring digits. Possible reasons for this lack of generalization are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4532912/ /pubmed/26322010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01216 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bahnmueller, Moeller, Mann and Nuerk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Bahnmueller, Julia Moeller, Korbinian Mann, Anne Nuerk, Hans-Christoph On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults |
title | On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults |
title_full | On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults |
title_fullStr | On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults |
title_full_unstemmed | On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults |
title_short | On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults |
title_sort | on the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bahnmuellerjulia onthelimitsoflanguageinfluencesonnumericalcognitionnoinversioneffectsinthreedigitnumbermagnitudeprocessinginadults AT moellerkorbinian onthelimitsoflanguageinfluencesonnumericalcognitionnoinversioneffectsinthreedigitnumbermagnitudeprocessinginadults AT mannanne onthelimitsoflanguageinfluencesonnumericalcognitionnoinversioneffectsinthreedigitnumbermagnitudeprocessinginadults AT nuerkhanschristoph onthelimitsoflanguageinfluencesonnumericalcognitionnoinversioneffectsinthreedigitnumbermagnitudeprocessinginadults |