Cargando…

Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?

Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shafiq, Ali, Lodhi, Hamza, Ahmed, Zaheer, Bajwa, Ata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357
_version_ 1782385280747044864
author Shafiq, Ali
Lodhi, Hamza
Ahmed, Zaheer
Bajwa, Ata
author_facet Shafiq, Ali
Lodhi, Hamza
Ahmed, Zaheer
Bajwa, Ata
author_sort Shafiq, Ali
collection PubMed
description Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86–105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4532959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45329592015-08-20 Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? Shafiq, Ali Lodhi, Hamza Ahmed, Zaheer Bajwa, Ata Thrombosis Research Article Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86–105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4532959/ /pubmed/26294971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ali Shafiq et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shafiq, Ali
Lodhi, Hamza
Ahmed, Zaheer
Bajwa, Ata
Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
title Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
title_full Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
title_fullStr Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
title_short Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
title_sort is the pulmonary embolism severity index being routinely used in clinical practice?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357
work_keys_str_mv AT shafiqali isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice
AT lodhihamza isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice
AT ahmedzaheer isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice
AT bajwaata isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice