Cargando…
Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discha...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357 |
_version_ | 1782385280747044864 |
---|---|
author | Shafiq, Ali Lodhi, Hamza Ahmed, Zaheer Bajwa, Ata |
author_facet | Shafiq, Ali Lodhi, Hamza Ahmed, Zaheer Bajwa, Ata |
author_sort | Shafiq, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86–105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4532959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45329592015-08-20 Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? Shafiq, Ali Lodhi, Hamza Ahmed, Zaheer Bajwa, Ata Thrombosis Research Article Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86–105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4532959/ /pubmed/26294971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ali Shafiq et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shafiq, Ali Lodhi, Hamza Ahmed, Zaheer Bajwa, Ata Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? |
title | Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? |
title_full | Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? |
title_fullStr | Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? |
title_short | Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice? |
title_sort | is the pulmonary embolism severity index being routinely used in clinical practice? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shafiqali isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice AT lodhihamza isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice AT ahmedzaheer isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice AT bajwaata isthepulmonaryembolismseverityindexbeingroutinelyusedinclinicalpractice |