Cargando…

Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses

BACKGROUND: The final position of the abutment changes with the amount of tightening torque. This could eventually lead to loss of passivity and marginal misfit of prostheses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different tightening torques on the marginal adaptation of 3-unit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghanbarzadeh, Jalil, Dashti, Hossin, Karamad, Reza, Alikhasi, Marzieh, Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4533195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288627
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.161458
_version_ 1782385301574909952
author Ghanbarzadeh, Jalil
Dashti, Hossin
Karamad, Reza
Alikhasi, Marzieh
Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
author_facet Ghanbarzadeh, Jalil
Dashti, Hossin
Karamad, Reza
Alikhasi, Marzieh
Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
author_sort Ghanbarzadeh, Jalil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The final position of the abutment changes with the amount of tightening torque. This could eventually lead to loss of passivity and marginal misfit of prostheses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different tightening torques on the marginal adaptation of 3-unit cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two implants (Straumann) were inserted in an acrylic block so that one of the implants was placed vertically and the other at a 15° vertical angle. A straight abutment and a 15° angulated abutment were connected to the vertically and obliquely installed implants, respectively, so that the two abutments were parallel. Then, 10 cement-retained FDPs were waxed and cast. Abutments were tightened with 10, 20, and 35 Ncm torques, respectively. Following each tightening torque, FDPs were luted on respective abutments with temporary cement. The marginal adaptation of the retainers was evaluated using stereomicroscope. FDPs were then removed from the abutments and were sectioned at the connector sites. The retainers were luted again on their respective abutments. Luting procedures and marginal adaptation measurement were repeated. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and least significant difference tests (α = 0.05). After cutting the FDP connectors, the independent samples t-test was used to compare misfit values (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Following 10, 20, and 35 Ncm tightening torques, the marginal discrepancy of the retainers of FDPs significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the marginal discrepancies of these two retainers (P > 0.05). The marginal gap values of angulated abutment retainers (ANRs) were significantly higher than those of the straight abutment after cutting the connectors (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the marginal misfit of cement-retained FDPs increased continuously when the tightening torque increased. After cutting the connectors, the marginal misfit of the ANRs was higher than those of the straight abutment retainers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4533195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45331952015-08-18 Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses Ghanbarzadeh, Jalil Dashti, Hossin Karamad, Reza Alikhasi, Marzieh Nakhaei, Mohammadreza Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The final position of the abutment changes with the amount of tightening torque. This could eventually lead to loss of passivity and marginal misfit of prostheses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different tightening torques on the marginal adaptation of 3-unit cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two implants (Straumann) were inserted in an acrylic block so that one of the implants was placed vertically and the other at a 15° vertical angle. A straight abutment and a 15° angulated abutment were connected to the vertically and obliquely installed implants, respectively, so that the two abutments were parallel. Then, 10 cement-retained FDPs were waxed and cast. Abutments were tightened with 10, 20, and 35 Ncm torques, respectively. Following each tightening torque, FDPs were luted on respective abutments with temporary cement. The marginal adaptation of the retainers was evaluated using stereomicroscope. FDPs were then removed from the abutments and were sectioned at the connector sites. The retainers were luted again on their respective abutments. Luting procedures and marginal adaptation measurement were repeated. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and least significant difference tests (α = 0.05). After cutting the FDP connectors, the independent samples t-test was used to compare misfit values (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Following 10, 20, and 35 Ncm tightening torques, the marginal discrepancy of the retainers of FDPs significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the marginal discrepancies of these two retainers (P > 0.05). The marginal gap values of angulated abutment retainers (ANRs) were significantly higher than those of the straight abutment after cutting the connectors (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the marginal misfit of cement-retained FDPs increased continuously when the tightening torque increased. After cutting the connectors, the marginal misfit of the ANRs was higher than those of the straight abutment retainers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4533195/ /pubmed/26288627 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.161458 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghanbarzadeh, Jalil
Dashti, Hossin
Karamad, Reza
Alikhasi, Marzieh
Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
title Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
title_full Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
title_fullStr Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
title_short Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
title_sort effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4533195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288627
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.161458
work_keys_str_mv AT ghanbarzadehjalil effectoftighteningtorqueonthemarginaladaptationofcementretainedimplantsupportedfixeddentalprostheses
AT dashtihossin effectoftighteningtorqueonthemarginaladaptationofcementretainedimplantsupportedfixeddentalprostheses
AT karamadreza effectoftighteningtorqueonthemarginaladaptationofcementretainedimplantsupportedfixeddentalprostheses
AT alikhasimarzieh effectoftighteningtorqueonthemarginaladaptationofcementretainedimplantsupportedfixeddentalprostheses
AT nakhaeimohammadreza effectoftighteningtorqueonthemarginaladaptationofcementretainedimplantsupportedfixeddentalprostheses