Cargando…

Comparison of Internal Shunts during Carotid Endarterectomy under Routine Shunting Policy

We compared patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using two-way and three-way internal shunts and discussed which shunt was more appropriate and effective for surgeons. Eighty-two patients (mean 69.5 ± 6.1 years old, mean degrees of stenosis 79.6 ± 10.4%) who had undergone CEA by our r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KATANO, Hiroyuki, YAMADA, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4533382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24305032
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa2013-0218
Descripción
Sumario:We compared patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using two-way and three-way internal shunts and discussed which shunt was more appropriate and effective for surgeons. Eighty-two patients (mean 69.5 ± 6.1 years old, mean degrees of stenosis 79.6 ± 10.4%) who had undergone CEA by our routine shunting policy were examined concerning the difference of Sundt and Pruitt-Inahara (P-I) shunts in clinical use. Carotid clamping time for the P-I shunt was over 2 minutes longer than that by Sundt in either split or conventional continuous arteriotomy (p < 0.001). The proportions of cases with multiple trials of either arteriotomy or insertion of a shunt tube, cases detected more than one high-intensity spot on diffusion-weighted images of magnetic resonance imaging after CEA, and cases detected postoperative intimal flaps detected by multi-detector CT angiography showed no significant differences between the two shunt groups. The two-way Sundt shunt was quicker than the three-way P-I shunt in placement with no remarkable problems. Split arteriotomy was not useful in shortening the placement time for either Sundt or P-I shunt tubes, compared with continuous arteriotomy. A simple two-way shunt with easy handling like the Sundt shunt would be also appropriate to choose in selective shunting under the unfamiliarity of treating shunts.