Cargando…

Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool

BACKGROUND: Medical Image segmentation is an important image processing step. Comparing images to evaluate the quality of segmentation is an essential part of measuring progress in this research area. Some of the challenges in evaluating medical segmentation are: metric selection, the use in the lit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taha, Abdel Aziz, Hanbury, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4533825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26263899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x
_version_ 1782385380519051264
author Taha, Abdel Aziz
Hanbury, Allan
author_facet Taha, Abdel Aziz
Hanbury, Allan
author_sort Taha, Abdel Aziz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical Image segmentation is an important image processing step. Comparing images to evaluate the quality of segmentation is an essential part of measuring progress in this research area. Some of the challenges in evaluating medical segmentation are: metric selection, the use in the literature of multiple definitions for certain metrics, inefficiency of the metric calculation implementations leading to difficulties with large volumes, and lack of support for fuzzy segmentation by existing metrics. RESULT: First we present an overview of 20 evaluation metrics selected based on a comprehensive literature review. For fuzzy segmentation, which shows the level of membership of each voxel to multiple classes, fuzzy definitions of all metrics are provided. We present a discussion about metric properties to provide a guide for selecting evaluation metrics. Finally, we propose an efficient evaluation tool implementing the 20 selected metrics. The tool is optimized to perform efficiently in terms of speed and required memory, also if the image size is extremely large as in the case of whole body MRI or CT volume segmentation. An implementation of this tool is available as an open source project. CONCLUSION: We propose an efficient evaluation tool for 3D medical image segmentation using 20 evaluation metrics and provide guidelines for selecting a subset of these metrics that is suitable for the data and the segmentation task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4533825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45338252015-08-13 Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool Taha, Abdel Aziz Hanbury, Allan BMC Med Imaging Software BACKGROUND: Medical Image segmentation is an important image processing step. Comparing images to evaluate the quality of segmentation is an essential part of measuring progress in this research area. Some of the challenges in evaluating medical segmentation are: metric selection, the use in the literature of multiple definitions for certain metrics, inefficiency of the metric calculation implementations leading to difficulties with large volumes, and lack of support for fuzzy segmentation by existing metrics. RESULT: First we present an overview of 20 evaluation metrics selected based on a comprehensive literature review. For fuzzy segmentation, which shows the level of membership of each voxel to multiple classes, fuzzy definitions of all metrics are provided. We present a discussion about metric properties to provide a guide for selecting evaluation metrics. Finally, we propose an efficient evaluation tool implementing the 20 selected metrics. The tool is optimized to perform efficiently in terms of speed and required memory, also if the image size is extremely large as in the case of whole body MRI or CT volume segmentation. An implementation of this tool is available as an open source project. CONCLUSION: We propose an efficient evaluation tool for 3D medical image segmentation using 20 evaluation metrics and provide guidelines for selecting a subset of these metrics that is suitable for the data and the segmentation task. BioMed Central 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4533825/ /pubmed/26263899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x Text en © Taha and Hanbury. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Software
Taha, Abdel Aziz
Hanbury, Allan
Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
title Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
title_full Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
title_fullStr Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
title_full_unstemmed Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
title_short Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
title_sort metrics for evaluating 3d medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
topic Software
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4533825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26263899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tahaabdelaziz metricsforevaluating3dmedicalimagesegmentationanalysisselectionandtool
AT hanburyallan metricsforevaluating3dmedicalimagesegmentationanalysisselectionandtool