Cargando…

How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals

Delays in peer reviewed publication may have consequences for both assessment of scientific prowess in academia as well as communication of important information to the knowledge receptor community. We present an analysis on the perspectives of authors publishing in conservation biology journals reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nguyen, Vivian M., Haddaway, Neal R., Gutowsky, Lee F. G., Wilson, Alexander D. M., Gallagher, Austin J., Donaldson, Michael R., Hammerschlag, Neil, Cooke, Steven J.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4533968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26267491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557

Ejemplares similares

Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals
Publicado: (2015)

How to get published in a standard peer-reviewed medical journal: Some useful tips for novice authors
por: Aziz, Anbreen
Publicado: (2020)

How long is (too) long?
por: Völlm, Birgit
Publicado: (2019)

Too Many Journals
por: Bates, Susan E.
Publicado: (2017)

A second chance for authors of hijacked journals to publish in legitimate journals
por: Jalalian, Mehrdad
Publicado: (2015)

Researcher perspectives on challenges and opportunities in conservation physiology revealed from an online survey
por: Madliger, Christine L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Too long for translocation?
por: Robinson, Richard
Publicado: (2008)

Commentary: Not too long, but long enough?
por: Minakata, Kenji
Publicado: (2021)

Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals
por: Kang, Ji Hun, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Success in Publishing: Selecting an Appropriate Journal and Braving the Peer-review Process
por: Tullu, MS, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Delayed decisions—how long is too long?
por: Villar, Richard
Publicado: (2016)

Delaying clozapine: how long is too long?
por: Varghese M, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals
por: Savage, Caroline J., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

CRediT for authors of articles published in the Journal of the Medical Library Association
por: Alpi, Kristine M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
por: Bravo, Giangiacomo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal
por: Busse, Clara, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Not too long, not too short: Goldilocks principle of eye size
por: Kuchtey, Rachel W.
Publicado: (2020)

Scientific journal publishing is too complex to be measured by a single metric: time to review the role of the impact factor!
por: Pirmez, Claude, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comments on Contemporary Journals
Publicado: (1883)

Comments on Contemporary Journals
Publicado: (1882)

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

An author's guide to publishing better articles in better journals in the behavioral sciences
por: Kupfersmid, Joel
Publicado: (1994)

Manuscript Submission Patterns of Authors Publishing in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Journals
por: Carver, Trevor J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Academic training of authors publishing in high-impact epidemiology and clinical journals
por: Sullivan, Amanda, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Reviewing and Electronic Publishing
por: Spigler, R
Publicado: (2002)

The Symbiotic Relationship between Authors, Medical Journals, Editors and the Peer Review System
por: Santini, Ario, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

It's never too late to publish an abandoned trial
por: Shiles, Celia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

International journal of contemporary sociology : A Discussion Journal of Contemporary Ideas and Research /
Publicado: (2005)

The levels of evidence of articles published by Indian authors in Indian journal of plastic surgery
por: Panse, Nikhil, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2021)

Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
por: Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers
por: Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Cross-sectional study of the relationship between women’s representation among editors and peer reviewers in journals of the British Medical Journal Publishing Group
por: Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Anticoagulation in COVID-19: not strong for too long?
por: Tacquard, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning
por: Dahan, Anat, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Defer surgery in operable breast cancer: how long is too long?
por: Roberts, Sacha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

SCOAP3: where libraries, scientists and publishers meet repositories, peer-reviewed journals and Open Access
por: Mele, Salvatore
Publicado: (2009)

A lesson learned about predatory journals and their difference from peer-reviewed open-access publishing
por: Murrell, Dedee F.
Publicado: (2016)

Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues
por: Kodvanj, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_874nicrb53amrp3p288g1un0v0