Cargando…
Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
BACKGROUND: The interpretation of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) largely relies on visual assessment by the physician of the localization and extent of a perfusion defect. The aim of this study was to introduce the concept of the perfusion vector as a new objective quantitative method for f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26268545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0121-3 |
_version_ | 1782385462294347776 |
---|---|
author | Minarik, David Senneby, Martin Wollmer, Per Mansten, Alva Sjöstrand, Karl Edenbrandt, Lars Trägårdh, Elin |
author_facet | Minarik, David Senneby, Martin Wollmer, Per Mansten, Alva Sjöstrand, Karl Edenbrandt, Lars Trägårdh, Elin |
author_sort | Minarik, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The interpretation of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) largely relies on visual assessment by the physician of the localization and extent of a perfusion defect. The aim of this study was to introduce the concept of the perfusion vector as a new objective quantitative method for further assisting the visual interpretation and to test the concept using simulated MPS images as well as patients. METHODS: The perfusion vector is based on calculating the difference between the anatomical centroid and the perfusion center of gravity of the left ventricle. Simulated MPS images were obtained using the SIMIND Monte Carlo program together with XCAT phantom. Four different-sized anterior and four lateral defects were simulated, and perfusion vector components x-, y-, and z-axes were calculated. For the patient study, 40 normal and 80 abnormal studies were included. Perfusion vectors were compared between normal and abnormal (apical, inferior, anterior, and lateral ischemia or infarction) studies and also correlated to the defect size. RESULTS: For simulated anterior defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the y-axis (anterior-inferior direction) increased in proportion to the defect size. For the simulated lateral defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the x-axis (septal-lateral direction) decreased in proportion to the defect size. When comparing normal and abnormal patients, there was a statistically significant difference for the stress perfusion vector on the x-axis for apical and lateral defects; on the y-axis for apical, inferior, and lateral defects; and on the z-axis (basal-apical direction) for apical, anterior, and lateral defects. A significant difference was shown for the difference vector magnitude (stress/rest) between normal and ischemic patients (p = 0.001) but not for patients with infarction. The correlation between the defect size and stress vector magnitude was also found to be significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The concept of the perfusion vector introduced in this study is shown to have potential in assisting the visual interpretation in MPS studies. Further studies are needed to validate the concept in patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4534480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45344802015-08-20 Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients Minarik, David Senneby, Martin Wollmer, Per Mansten, Alva Sjöstrand, Karl Edenbrandt, Lars Trägårdh, Elin EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The interpretation of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) largely relies on visual assessment by the physician of the localization and extent of a perfusion defect. The aim of this study was to introduce the concept of the perfusion vector as a new objective quantitative method for further assisting the visual interpretation and to test the concept using simulated MPS images as well as patients. METHODS: The perfusion vector is based on calculating the difference between the anatomical centroid and the perfusion center of gravity of the left ventricle. Simulated MPS images were obtained using the SIMIND Monte Carlo program together with XCAT phantom. Four different-sized anterior and four lateral defects were simulated, and perfusion vector components x-, y-, and z-axes were calculated. For the patient study, 40 normal and 80 abnormal studies were included. Perfusion vectors were compared between normal and abnormal (apical, inferior, anterior, and lateral ischemia or infarction) studies and also correlated to the defect size. RESULTS: For simulated anterior defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the y-axis (anterior-inferior direction) increased in proportion to the defect size. For the simulated lateral defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the x-axis (septal-lateral direction) decreased in proportion to the defect size. When comparing normal and abnormal patients, there was a statistically significant difference for the stress perfusion vector on the x-axis for apical and lateral defects; on the y-axis for apical, inferior, and lateral defects; and on the z-axis (basal-apical direction) for apical, anterior, and lateral defects. A significant difference was shown for the difference vector magnitude (stress/rest) between normal and ischemic patients (p = 0.001) but not for patients with infarction. The correlation between the defect size and stress vector magnitude was also found to be significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The concept of the perfusion vector introduced in this study is shown to have potential in assisting the visual interpretation in MPS studies. Further studies are needed to validate the concept in patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4534480/ /pubmed/26268545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0121-3 Text en © Minarik et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Minarik, David Senneby, Martin Wollmer, Per Mansten, Alva Sjöstrand, Karl Edenbrandt, Lars Trägårdh, Elin Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients |
title | Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients |
title_full | Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients |
title_fullStr | Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients |
title_short | Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients |
title_sort | perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26268545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0121-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minarikdavid perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients AT sennebymartin perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients AT wollmerper perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients AT manstenalva perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients AT sjostrandkarl perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients AT edenbrandtlars perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients AT tragardhelin perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients |