Cargando…

Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients

BACKGROUND: The interpretation of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) largely relies on visual assessment by the physician of the localization and extent of a perfusion defect. The aim of this study was to introduce the concept of the perfusion vector as a new objective quantitative method for f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minarik, David, Senneby, Martin, Wollmer, Per, Mansten, Alva, Sjöstrand, Karl, Edenbrandt, Lars, Trägårdh, Elin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26268545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0121-3
_version_ 1782385462294347776
author Minarik, David
Senneby, Martin
Wollmer, Per
Mansten, Alva
Sjöstrand, Karl
Edenbrandt, Lars
Trägårdh, Elin
author_facet Minarik, David
Senneby, Martin
Wollmer, Per
Mansten, Alva
Sjöstrand, Karl
Edenbrandt, Lars
Trägårdh, Elin
author_sort Minarik, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The interpretation of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) largely relies on visual assessment by the physician of the localization and extent of a perfusion defect. The aim of this study was to introduce the concept of the perfusion vector as a new objective quantitative method for further assisting the visual interpretation and to test the concept using simulated MPS images as well as patients. METHODS: The perfusion vector is based on calculating the difference between the anatomical centroid and the perfusion center of gravity of the left ventricle. Simulated MPS images were obtained using the SIMIND Monte Carlo program together with XCAT phantom. Four different-sized anterior and four lateral defects were simulated, and perfusion vector components x-, y-, and z-axes were calculated. For the patient study, 40 normal and 80 abnormal studies were included. Perfusion vectors were compared between normal and abnormal (apical, inferior, anterior, and lateral ischemia or infarction) studies and also correlated to the defect size. RESULTS: For simulated anterior defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the y-axis (anterior-inferior direction) increased in proportion to the defect size. For the simulated lateral defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the x-axis (septal-lateral direction) decreased in proportion to the defect size. When comparing normal and abnormal patients, there was a statistically significant difference for the stress perfusion vector on the x-axis for apical and lateral defects; on the y-axis for apical, inferior, and lateral defects; and on the z-axis (basal-apical direction) for apical, anterior, and lateral defects. A significant difference was shown for the difference vector magnitude (stress/rest) between normal and ischemic patients (p = 0.001) but not for patients with infarction. The correlation between the defect size and stress vector magnitude was also found to be significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The concept of the perfusion vector introduced in this study is shown to have potential in assisting the visual interpretation in MPS studies. Further studies are needed to validate the concept in patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4534480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45344802015-08-20 Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients Minarik, David Senneby, Martin Wollmer, Per Mansten, Alva Sjöstrand, Karl Edenbrandt, Lars Trägårdh, Elin EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The interpretation of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) largely relies on visual assessment by the physician of the localization and extent of a perfusion defect. The aim of this study was to introduce the concept of the perfusion vector as a new objective quantitative method for further assisting the visual interpretation and to test the concept using simulated MPS images as well as patients. METHODS: The perfusion vector is based on calculating the difference between the anatomical centroid and the perfusion center of gravity of the left ventricle. Simulated MPS images were obtained using the SIMIND Monte Carlo program together with XCAT phantom. Four different-sized anterior and four lateral defects were simulated, and perfusion vector components x-, y-, and z-axes were calculated. For the patient study, 40 normal and 80 abnormal studies were included. Perfusion vectors were compared between normal and abnormal (apical, inferior, anterior, and lateral ischemia or infarction) studies and also correlated to the defect size. RESULTS: For simulated anterior defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the y-axis (anterior-inferior direction) increased in proportion to the defect size. For the simulated lateral defects, the stress perfusion vector component on the x-axis (septal-lateral direction) decreased in proportion to the defect size. When comparing normal and abnormal patients, there was a statistically significant difference for the stress perfusion vector on the x-axis for apical and lateral defects; on the y-axis for apical, inferior, and lateral defects; and on the z-axis (basal-apical direction) for apical, anterior, and lateral defects. A significant difference was shown for the difference vector magnitude (stress/rest) between normal and ischemic patients (p = 0.001) but not for patients with infarction. The correlation between the defect size and stress vector magnitude was also found to be significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The concept of the perfusion vector introduced in this study is shown to have potential in assisting the visual interpretation in MPS studies. Further studies are needed to validate the concept in patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4534480/ /pubmed/26268545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0121-3 Text en © Minarik et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Minarik, David
Senneby, Martin
Wollmer, Per
Mansten, Alva
Sjöstrand, Karl
Edenbrandt, Lars
Trägårdh, Elin
Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
title Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
title_full Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
title_fullStr Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
title_full_unstemmed Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
title_short Perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
title_sort perfusion vector—a new method to quantify myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: a simulation study with validation in patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26268545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0121-3
work_keys_str_mv AT minarikdavid perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients
AT sennebymartin perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients
AT wollmerper perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients
AT manstenalva perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients
AT sjostrandkarl perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients
AT edenbrandtlars perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients
AT tragardhelin perfusionvectoranewmethodtoquantifymyocardialperfusionscintigraphyimagesasimulationstudywithvalidationinpatients