Cargando…

Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients is reported to replicate with a doubling time of 1.2–2 days, and weekly screening is recommended for early diagnosis. We re-evaluated these features in our cohort of transplant recipients. METHODS: The CMV doubling time of the firs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lodding, I.P., Sengeløv, H., da Cunha-Bang, C., Iversen, M., Rasmussen, A., Gustafsson, F., Downing, J.G., Grarup, J., Kirkby, N., Frederiksen, C.M., Mocroft, A., Sørensen, S.S., Lundgren, J.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.05.003
_version_ 1782385488858972160
author Lodding, I.P.
Sengeløv, H.
da Cunha-Bang, C.
Iversen, M.
Rasmussen, A.
Gustafsson, F.
Downing, J.G.
Grarup, J.
Kirkby, N.
Frederiksen, C.M.
Mocroft, A.
Sørensen, S.S.
Lundgren, J.D.
author_facet Lodding, I.P.
Sengeløv, H.
da Cunha-Bang, C.
Iversen, M.
Rasmussen, A.
Gustafsson, F.
Downing, J.G.
Grarup, J.
Kirkby, N.
Frederiksen, C.M.
Mocroft, A.
Sørensen, S.S.
Lundgren, J.D.
author_sort Lodding, I.P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients is reported to replicate with a doubling time of 1.2–2 days, and weekly screening is recommended for early diagnosis. We re-evaluated these features in our cohort of transplant recipients. METHODS: The CMV doubling time of the first CMV infection in the first year post-transplant could be calculated for 193 recipients of haematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. Factors determining the proportion of recipients with a high diagnostic CMV viral load (≥ 18,200 IU/mL) were explored using mathematical simulation. FINDINGS: The overall median doubling time was 4.3 days (IQR 2.5–7.8) and was not influenced by prior CMV immunity, or type of transplantation (p > 0.4). Assuming a fixed doubling time of 1.3 days and screening intervals of 7 or 10 days, 11.1% and 33.3% were projected to have a high CMV viral load at diagnosis, compared to 1.4% and 4.3% if the doubling time varies as observed in our cohort. Consistently, 1.9% of recipients screened weekly had a high diagnostic virus load. INTERPRETATION: Screening intervals can be extended to 10 days in cohorts with comparable CMV doubling time, whereas shorter than 7 days is required in cohorts with shorter doubling times to maintain pre-emptive screening quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4534685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45346852015-08-18 Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections Lodding, I.P. Sengeløv, H. da Cunha-Bang, C. Iversen, M. Rasmussen, A. Gustafsson, F. Downing, J.G. Grarup, J. Kirkby, N. Frederiksen, C.M. Mocroft, A. Sørensen, S.S. Lundgren, J.D. EBioMedicine Original Article BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients is reported to replicate with a doubling time of 1.2–2 days, and weekly screening is recommended for early diagnosis. We re-evaluated these features in our cohort of transplant recipients. METHODS: The CMV doubling time of the first CMV infection in the first year post-transplant could be calculated for 193 recipients of haematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. Factors determining the proportion of recipients with a high diagnostic CMV viral load (≥ 18,200 IU/mL) were explored using mathematical simulation. FINDINGS: The overall median doubling time was 4.3 days (IQR 2.5–7.8) and was not influenced by prior CMV immunity, or type of transplantation (p > 0.4). Assuming a fixed doubling time of 1.3 days and screening intervals of 7 or 10 days, 11.1% and 33.3% were projected to have a high CMV viral load at diagnosis, compared to 1.4% and 4.3% if the doubling time varies as observed in our cohort. Consistently, 1.9% of recipients screened weekly had a high diagnostic virus load. INTERPRETATION: Screening intervals can be extended to 10 days in cohorts with comparable CMV doubling time, whereas shorter than 7 days is required in cohorts with shorter doubling times to maintain pre-emptive screening quality. Elsevier 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4534685/ /pubmed/26288842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.05.003 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lodding, I.P.
Sengeløv, H.
da Cunha-Bang, C.
Iversen, M.
Rasmussen, A.
Gustafsson, F.
Downing, J.G.
Grarup, J.
Kirkby, N.
Frederiksen, C.M.
Mocroft, A.
Sørensen, S.S.
Lundgren, J.D.
Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections
title Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections
title_full Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections
title_fullStr Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections
title_short Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections
title_sort clinical application of variation in replication kinetics during episodes of post-transplant cytomegalovirus infections
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT loddingip clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT sengeløvh clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT dacunhabangc clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT iversenm clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT rasmussena clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT gustafssonf clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT downingjg clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT grarupj clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT kirkbyn clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT frederiksencm clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT mocrofta clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT sørensenss clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT lundgrenjd clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections
AT clinicalapplicationofvariationinreplicationkineticsduringepisodesofposttransplantcytomegalovirusinfections