Cargando…
Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes
While sex requires two parents, there is no obvious need for them to be differentiated into distinct mating types or sexes. Yet this is the predominate state of nature. Here, we argue that mating types could play a decisive role because they prevent the apparent inevitability of self-stimulation dur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4535405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0342 |
_version_ | 1782385601855619072 |
---|---|
author | Hadjivasiliou, Zena Iwasa, Yoh Pomiankowski, Andrew |
author_facet | Hadjivasiliou, Zena Iwasa, Yoh Pomiankowski, Andrew |
author_sort | Hadjivasiliou, Zena |
collection | PubMed |
description | While sex requires two parents, there is no obvious need for them to be differentiated into distinct mating types or sexes. Yet this is the predominate state of nature. Here, we argue that mating types could play a decisive role because they prevent the apparent inevitability of self-stimulation during sexual signalling. We rigorously assess this hypothesis by developing a model for signaller–detector dynamics based on chemical diffusion, chemotaxis and cell movement. Our model examines the conditions under which chemotaxis improves partner finding. Varying parameter values within ranges typical of protists and their environments, we show that simultaneous secretion and detection of a single chemoattractant can cause a multifold movement impediment and severely hinder mate finding. Mutually exclusive roles result in faster pair formation, even when cells conferring the same roles cannot pair up. This arrangement also allows the separate mating types to optimize their signalling or detecting roles, which is effectively impossible for cells that are both secretors and detectors. Our findings suggest that asymmetric roles in sexual chemotaxis (and possibly other forms of sexual signalling) are crucial, even without morphological differences, and may underlie the evolution of gametic differentiation among both mating types and sexes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4535405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45354052015-08-21 Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes Hadjivasiliou, Zena Iwasa, Yoh Pomiankowski, Andrew J R Soc Interface Research Articles While sex requires two parents, there is no obvious need for them to be differentiated into distinct mating types or sexes. Yet this is the predominate state of nature. Here, we argue that mating types could play a decisive role because they prevent the apparent inevitability of self-stimulation during sexual signalling. We rigorously assess this hypothesis by developing a model for signaller–detector dynamics based on chemical diffusion, chemotaxis and cell movement. Our model examines the conditions under which chemotaxis improves partner finding. Varying parameter values within ranges typical of protists and their environments, we show that simultaneous secretion and detection of a single chemoattractant can cause a multifold movement impediment and severely hinder mate finding. Mutually exclusive roles result in faster pair formation, even when cells conferring the same roles cannot pair up. This arrangement also allows the separate mating types to optimize their signalling or detecting roles, which is effectively impossible for cells that are both secretors and detectors. Our findings suggest that asymmetric roles in sexual chemotaxis (and possibly other forms of sexual signalling) are crucial, even without morphological differences, and may underlie the evolution of gametic differentiation among both mating types and sexes. The Royal Society 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4535405/ /pubmed/26156301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0342 Text en © 2015 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Hadjivasiliou, Zena Iwasa, Yoh Pomiankowski, Andrew Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes |
title | Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes |
title_full | Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes |
title_fullStr | Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes |
title_short | Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes |
title_sort | cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4535405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0342 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadjivasiliouzena cellcellsignallinginsexualchemotaxisabasisforgameticdifferentiationmatingtypesandsexes AT iwasayoh cellcellsignallinginsexualchemotaxisabasisforgameticdifferentiationmatingtypesandsexes AT pomiankowskiandrew cellcellsignallinginsexualchemotaxisabasisforgameticdifferentiationmatingtypesandsexes |